Why Navigating contractual risks are indispensable in Nigeria’s power sector
The economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic is affecting developments in Nigeria’s power sector to such a degree that some stakeholders are concerned over project risks facing some major contracts in the sector.
This concern has become prevalent among projects and construction practitioners in the Nigerian and West African markets where most developers may need to raise debt to fund the construction of the project.
In Nigeria or Africa at large, a shortage of bankable projects remains a key bottleneck as large infrastructure projects have extensive development periods and often entail multifaceted feasibility studies and expert transaction advice.
“To put it simply, the main concern is - will the lenders be repaid? That is what it comes down to. If a project is going to be bankable, the lenders will need to know that, whatever happens, within reason, they are going to get repaid,” Arun Velusami, Partner at United Kingdom-based Hogan Lovells explained in a two days virtual session hosted by Hogan Lovells, in partnership with Ghanaian law firm BentsiEnchill, Letsa and Ankomah.
The discussion featured stakeholders in the fields of construction, project management, dispute management and dispute resolution who delivered insights on how to navigate contractual agreements within the power sector.
Also, the discussion centred on power sector projects, exploring the best legal practices in the management of power projects and why Nigeria and Africa need to change approaches to power project contracts due to the current situation of coronavirus pandemic.
“During the negotiation phase of power projects where the power and concession agreement is being exchanged, one of the areas raised is if COVID-19 should be dealt with as a force majeure event,” Velusami said at the event.
Commenting on dispute resolution clauses in the context of power contracts, Ademola Bamgbose, a dispute resolution expert in the London office at Hogan Lovells, noted that “dispute resolution clauses are often relegated to the end of contractual negotiations; or dismissed as “boilerplate” and given standard wording without any thought as to the context.”
He noted that these clauses can have profound implications on how a dispute is resolved and on how the contractual rights and obligations in a power contract are enforced”.
He emphasized the importance of robust and drafted dispute resolution clauses as it can be somewhat difficult to get parties to agree on anything after the dispute has arisen.