Tragic symbolic blunders on Buhari’s national sympathy tour
The president’s reluctant decision to compensate for insensitively celebrating with his privileged friends in Kano who luxuriated in obscene opulence at a time the nation was (and still is) reeling from a string of horrendous sanguinary tragedies by visiting the nation’s hot spots has lost its symbolic worth for at least three reasons.
Symbolic gestures are appreciated only when they are not forced, when they are given willingly, or unexpectedly. That’s why people don’t appreciate birthday gifts from their significant others if the gifts are given only after they are demanded-or only after the givers are reminded. The value of the gifts isn’t in their monetary worth but in the thought that goes into buying and giving them unsolicited. It’s the same with symbolic presidential visits. Their value doesn’t lie in the immediate problems they solve because they don’t solve any problems; their value lies in their symbolism. So Buhari’s forced tour of the nation is actually symbolically worthless, but it’s at least better than his accustomed aloofness.
Nevertheless, the president appears to still be smarting from being forced to visit troubled spots in the nation. He said he should “not be expected to always go out to the field to make noise and insult the sensibility of Nigerians before it would be known that I am taking actions against the killings.” Fair enough. But does he have to attend wedding ceremonies of his elite friends even in moments of national catastrophes? Can’t he be represented by a minister, the same way that he sends delegates to sites of national tragedies? Or is it only the tragedies of poor people that he doesn’t have to personally attend to?
What is worse, though, is that the president is vitiating, even undermining, the whole point of the tour through his indelicate and unpresidential pronouncements in Taraba. The media reported him to have said that more people have been killed in Taraba than in Benue and Zamfara combined, adding he has a way of gathering his “own information on all the crises and killings in the country.” Exactly what purpose does this insensitive hierarchization of needless and avoidable bloodletting serve?
The president was clearly attempting to delegitimize the pains of the people of Benue and Zamfara. Nothing can be more painful than to have one’s pains made light of, especially by a person whose duty it is to comfort you. Even a single death is a tragedy whose horror shouldn’t be attenuated by odious comparisons. As Vice Chancellor of ABU, Professor AngoAbdullahi was viciously excoriated in the 1980s when he said “only two” student activists were killed by police bullets during a protest.
Buhari’s gaffe is even more egregious. He has sworn to protect all Nigerians irrespective of their ethnicity, religion, or state of origin. So why give more weight to one tragedy than others?
Already, this unwarranted presidential gradation of tragedies has rendered the president vulnerable to charges of ethnic partisanship-and for good reason. In tense moments like this, the president should be a consolerin-chief. He shouldn’t be seen to be escalating conflicts by playing favorites.
Another tragic gaffe the president made was his insistence that he had fulfilled his campaign promise to secure the nation. “Today, even our worst enemy can attest to the fact that the APC-led federal government has done well in the area of security,” he said.“We have decimated Boko Haram, while the fight against corruption is going on well.” If government has “done well in the area of security,” why is the president on a tour of scenes of bloodletting? Why do we have more widespread bloodbaths in the nation now than at any time in recent memory?
A president who doesn’t see the contradiction inflaunting his “success” in security while on a forced sympathy tour of several parts of the country that are drenched in oceans of blood lives in an alternate universe. He is completely disconnected from reality. And that’s scary.
I seriously doubt that Nigeria can survive a Buhari second term. The man simply doesn’t have the temperament, emotional maturity, and intellectual preparedness to govern a complex, multi-ethnic, and multi-religious country like Nigeria. Anyone who can’t see this is worse than blind.
Dapchi Girls: Buhari is Emboldening, Not Degrading, Boko Haram
The abduction of innocent school girls in Dapchi, Yobe State, is yet another evidence of the falsehood about Buhari’s “success” in downgrading Boko Haram. I have called out these lies several times in the past at the cost of inviting smears and ad hominem attacks on myself. But that’s an insignificant price to pay for standing for the truth.
Contrary to claims that his government has downgraded Boko Haram, Buhari is actually bolstering the group. For evidence, look at these facts:
As a reward for releasing 84 Chibok girls, the Buhari government paid Boko Haram a €3 million ransom, which adds up to more than 1.3 billion naira, according to the Wall Street Journal of December 4, 2017. “Several senior officials confirmed that the swap included the release of five captured militants and a total of three million euros, delivered in two drop-offs,” the paper reported. “To a threadbare insurgency that had been driven into the mountains, the two payments in 2016 and 2017 represented a timely windfall. Since the insurgents collected their three million euros, some Nigerian officials say an army that had struggled to feed itself seems replenished.”
Earlier in October 2016, the main means of transportation. Yet, they wrote several dozens of books.
With all the modern tools of science and technology available to our flamboyant scholars including customized tables, cushion chairs, electricity, computer machines, laptops, Laser Jet printers, the internet, GSM phones, air-conditioned rooms and cars; they have failed to even write commentaries on the works of the foremost scholars of Sokoto Caliphate let alone carry their intellectual legacies further by writing more books. If our flamboyant scholars cannot carry the intellectual heritage of the foremost scholars of Sokoto Caliphate further by authoring more books, they have a duty not to allow the literary legacy to perish.
On apathy towards the material world, it is a virtue that is expediently in short supply in flamboyant scholars. Achieving this virtuous quality requires piety, which Allah (SWT) describes in Qur’an 35:28 to be traditionally symptomatic of scholars. So, if scholars are divinely believed to be pious, they should thus be in the front row of any gathering that is founded on apathy.
Unfortunately, the flamboyant lifestyles of some modern scholars have pushed them to the back rows in the congregation of virtuous and contented believers. Flamboyant scholars move in convoys of cars with pilot vehicles in front and behind them. For reasons I do not know, they prolong prayers when invited to conduct wedding and naming litanies (commonly referred to as “fatiha”). How would you describe a flamboyant scholar who relocates to Abuja for the mere coziness of life that defines Nigeria’s modern government paid the terrorist group what the London Guardian of October 14, 2016 called a “‘handsome ransom’ worth millions of dollars” in exchange for the release of 21 Chibok girls. “Millions of dollars” would add up to at least a billion naira. Again on February 11, 2018, the government paid Boko Haram an unspecified amount of money to free 13 hostages. In essence, Boko Haram now has a bigger, fiercer, more menacing war chest-financed from Nigeria’s public treasury- than the Nigerian military.
Meanwhile, Boko Haram’s ranks are being swelled by the same government. For instance, in addition to paying the group 705 million naira in 2017, five notoriously vicious Boko Haram commanders in the custody of Nigerian authorities were released. On January 15, 2018, the government freed 244 “repentant” Boko Haram members. How the hell did they know that they are “repentant”? And what does that even mean? A few days ago. the government freed another 526 Boko Haram members, according to CNN. There’s more, but that’s what I remember for now. Feel free to add to this.
When you add this to the fact that on at least two occasions (according to BBC Hausa and Daily Trust), our foot soldiers who came close to capturing Boko Haram leader AbubakarShekau were told to back off by unnamed honchos in Abuja, there is little doubt that the Buhari administration is an enabler of Boko Haram.
What’s even more tragic, though, is the utterly irresponsible propaganda the government spews about “technically” or “completely” defeating Boko Haram, which has anesthetized vulnerable people into a false sense of security and made them easy targets of the murderous, nihilistic terrorists. capital city? Others go to UK wearing clothes that are alien to the civilization they represent. Well, “Actions”, the Prophet (SAW) said, “will be judged by the motives that prompted them”. It’s time for flamboyant scholars to stop fetching excuses to justify their modern lifestyles.
Humility, the third virtue I consider typical of scholars, often earns respect for humble persons. This is also missing in some of our modern scholars. Indeed, those who cannot feel the littleness of great things in themselves are apt to overlook the greatness in the little things in others. Some flamboyant scholars, perhaps out of questionable scholarship, arrogate certain authorities that naturally do not belong to them. The Prophet (SAW) through whom the holy Qur’an reached humanity is described as the “City” of knowledge; yet, he never displayed an atom of superciliousness. Capitalizing on the ignorance or naivety of their followers, some modern scholars say and do certain things that are outrageous when placed on the scale of orthodox Islam.
Some of the idiosyncrasies of modern scholars identified in this discourse presumably account for their low esteem in the eyes of the public. Truly, flamboyant scholars no longer command due respect from people. Knowledge is one of the three deeds from which the Prophet (SAW) said a Muslim will continue to benefit even after his death. We expect scholars to be inspired by this hadith to ignore the transitory luxuries of life. May Allah (SWT) guide our contemporary scholars to appreciate the infinite treasures in knowledge in order to forsake flamboyant lifestyles, amin.