VCs, rectors, provosts lament extortion by Reps
to the institutions across Nigeria, directing them not to proceed with the implementation of the approved projects until they meet with members of the committee.
President Bola Tinubu had approved over N683billion as 2024 allocation to beneficiary institutions under the TETFund scheme.
This was disclosed by the executive secretary of TETFund, Sonny Echono, an architect, during the 2024 Strategic Planning Meeting held with heads of the institutions in January 2024, at the Fund’s headquarters in Abuja.
Speaking at the meeting, Echono said, “I am pleased to inform you that Mr President has approved the 2024 disbursement guidelines in the total sum of N683,429,268,402.64. From this total, 90.75 per cent is budgeted for direct disbursement and 8.94 per cent for some designated special projects. A stabilisation of 2.27 per cent is allowed to enable the Fund respond to emerging issues.
“This is inclusive of the difference between actual collections and the projections made for November and December 2023 collections as requested and approved by Mr President.
“Based on this approval, each university will get, for the 2024 intervention cycle, the total amount of N1, 906,944,930.00. This comprises N1, 656,944,930.00 as Annual Direct Disbursement and N250m as Zonal Intervention. Similarly, each polytechnic will get N1,165,355,235.00 comprising of N1,015,355,235.00 as Annual Direct Disbursement and N150m as Zonal Intervention, while each college of education will get N1,398,426,282.00 comprising of N1,248,426,282.00 as Annual Direct Disbursement and N150 million as Zonal Intervention.”
Echono charged heads of beneficiary institutions on early implementation of their respective allocations.
He advised them to consult widely with their respective communities in the implementation of TETFund projects, and also ensure timely payments to contractors and vendors when due.
This, he said, would enable proper completion of projects and mitigate the incidence of contractors writing letters of complaints to the Fund.
However, the House committee has directed that no project should be executed until the heads of the various institutions submitted details of their implementation plans and also appear before a panel.
The committee, in a letter dated January 12,2024 and sent to the secretarygeneral, Committee on Vice Chancellors of Nigerian Universities (CVCNU), Prof Yakubu Ochefu, ordered stoppage of execution of TETFund projects across the country for the 2024 intervention cycle.
The letter, with reference number NASS/HR/10/EDT/VOL4/237 and signed by the committee’s clerk, Gbolagun Isaiah Akinwunmi, requested all universities to, among other things, submit drawings, designs and specifications, procurement, among others, to the committee.
The communication directed that relevant documents be submitted to the committee, on or before February 23, and that the heads of the institutions are to appear before it on February 27, 2024.
“In accordance with the House committee’s statutory oversight mandate on all public tertiary institutions in relation to the implementation of all
TETFund interventions and allocations, I am directed to request your institution’s 2024 TETFund normal intervention implementation details.
“You are requested to furnish the committee with the full implementation details, including but not limited to the drawings, designs and specifications for all projects procurement and services as contained in your 2024 TETFund Normal Intervention Allocation letter issued to your Institution.
“In view of the above, and sequel to section 80(3) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (As amended) and the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives, the House Committee on TETFund and Other Services shall conduct further consideration of your submission to ensure compliance with the Fund’s Guidelines and Establishment Act as part of its oversight function. Kindly note that you are expected to stay action on implementation processes until submission and appearance before the committee is concluded,” the letter reads.
But the heads of the institutions lamented that the move constituted a stumbling block to early implementation of TETFund projects.
Besides, they also view the move as a usurpation of the powers of the governing councils of the various institutions and that of TETFund, who have direct oversight of the institutions.
A vice chancellor of one of the federal universities said the lawmakers were allegedly hiding under the guise of the exercise to extort universities.
He said, “I must tell you that it is not in the interest of the universities but their pockets.
“We all know what they want to do; it is to make money from the institutions, if not, why ask us to go for verification or presentation of our implementation details after the president has approved funds and TETFund carried out their disbursement according to laid down rules?”
He alleged that lawmakers and some government agencies have been extorting tertiary institutions through numerous visits in the name of oversight.
“We have different committees visiting us from different government agencies in the name of quality assurance, oversight visits, among others; and during each visit, you are expected to part with a certain amount of money. And to be honest, it makes leading the universities difficult.
“Every intervention is carried out with the approval of the president, and follows due process as well.
“The federal government has to look into this and stop these unnecessary visits. The universities are already crying to meet up with several expenses like buying diesel and paying light (electricity) bills, among others,” the VC said.
An accountant in one of the federal polytechnics described the oversight function as “a racket.”
“There was a certain review before the latest invitation. The committee asked us to photocopy all the documents and bring them in ‘Ghana Must Go’ bags.
“I was really shocked when we arrived together with our rector. They didn’t ask us to open the bags; they just asked the rector some questions.
“Of course, they have been settled far ahead of time; therefore, within the shortest time we were asked to leave,” the accountant said.
What the law says
We all know what they want to do; it is to make money from the institutions, if not, why ask us to go for verification or presentation of our implementation details after the president has approved funds and TETFund carried out their disbursement according to laid down rules?
Meanwhile, Daily Trust Saturday learnt that the TETFund guidelines on project interventions have made it clear on how allocations are to be implemented.
A source said TETFund gives allocations, but the institutions in turn propose their projects, which must be in tandem with their needs.
He said the beneficiary institutions were always encouraged to have a strategic plan for at least 10 years, indicating the kind of projects the institution would like to undertake.
He said this was to avoid a situation where some institutions or politicians would hijack or stop the projects initiated by previous vice chancellors.
The source explained that TETFund projects are a continuous process and no one would stop an ongoing project or embark on another without finishing the one that has commenced.
Although TETFund declined to speak on the summons to the heads of the tertiary institutions by the Reps committee, a copy of its guidelines obtained by Daily Trust Saturday showed that there are well specified rules already stipulated, which the institutions must meet in order to access the funds to carry out projects or procurements.
delay projects
Move will implementation
Meanwhile, the Committee of ProChancellors of State-owned Universities (COPSUN), in a statement issued on January 24 and signed by the secretary of the committee, Suleiman Abubakar Mahdi, on behalf of the chairman, lamented the directives of the House committee.
The statement, with ref number, COPSUN/PR/24/001 and titled “Press statement on the directive to the vice chancellors of Nigerian universities suspending the implementation of TETFund normal interventions,” noted that the committee “is gravely concerned about this unprecedented directive given at a time when the universities are in various stages of procurement and the likely effect it will have on their budgetary implementation processes.
“It should be noted that the governing councils of the various state-owned universities are by law empowered to award or approve the award of contracts after due procurement and are doing so in exercise of the prerogative.
“With the greatest respect to the House committee, we feel that their action is not an encroachment on the autonomy of the universities but an infringement on the doctrine of the separation of powers, which has the potential for conflict among the tiers and branches of government.
“The House committee may wish to be respectfully reminded that the funds disbursed by TETFund belong to the states and are subject to appropriation and exclusive oversight by the various states’ House of Assembly. Therefore, the directive, even if valid, should not apply to the state-owned universities.
“Furthermore, time is of essence in executing these contracts, and with the upward trend in the dollar exchange rate with the resultant inflation, this could ultimately increase cost,” the COPSUN stated.