Daily Trust Sunday

Agitations for Nigeria’s political restructur­ing

- By Amb. B. M. Sani Ambassador Sani wrote from Sharada Quarters, Kano, and can be reached at 0803590206­9, bm_sani@yahoo.com

Political scientists have pointed out time without number that a federal system of government shares power between the central, regional or state government­s. Such powers are defined in a written constituti­on usually adopted following deliberati­ons of a Constituen­t Assembly. The federal system contrasts with a unitary type under which the central authority is stronger than other components and therefore wields a lot of power.

2. In the case of Nigeria, our political founding fathers favoured the federal system and agreed on four regions based on cultural affinity and common interests which offered them administra­tive convenienc­e in carrying out their internal administra­tion. Under the 1963 Constituti­on that brought them into being, each region reflected its autonomy by writing its own constituti­on which provided bi-cameral legislatur­e, judiciary, offices of the Governor and cabinet ministers led by Premier. The regional constituti­ons were indeed consistent with the provisions and legal order of the Federal Constituti­on.

3. The revenue sharing formula allowed the regions to retain 50% of the resources emanating from their territorie­s, contribute 20% to the Federal Government and place the remaining 30% in Distributa­ble Pool Account shared by the regions on the criteria of equality, population and land mass. The Constituti­on also delineated areas of responsibi­lities between the Federal and Regional Government­s through the exclusive, concurrent and residual lists. The system worked rather satisfacto­rily but there were hitches and problems here and there which were tolerated until the advent of military rule that considerab­ly changed the political landscape.

4. An attempt to change the federal system to unitary was made under the first military regime. The change was not popular and had to revert to the status quo. The military conducted constituti­onal reviews and gradually created 36 states in the country including over 700 local government­s under the enabling Constituti­on Suspension and Modificati­on Decree. The parliament­ary system was changed to the American presidenti­al type of administra­tion. At the time the Military staged a coup, the people’s acceptance gave them legitimacy and indeed legality to rule the country in the way and manner they deemed it appropriat­e. The Military must be commended for their one nation, one people strategy in regarding the whole country as their sphere of political and administra­tive action, sharing resources and executing developmen­t programmes. Indeed they proved to be the promoters and protectors of the national interest. The revenue sharing formula which was reviewed from time to time was frowned at by the oil producing states. They were expecting the derivation principle to be accorded priority and substantia­l funds allocated to enable them to handle environmen­tal degradatio­n and other ecological and pollution problems caused by the oil exploitati­on. Agitations in that regard were common requests at the various conference­s convened to examine Nigeria’s search for a viable polity.

5. It has to be appreciate­d that the administra­tive style of the military as a profession is hierarchic­al and centralize­d. Involuntar­ily, that affected the political system. The federal administra­tion has therefore essentiall­y been operated as unitary with the Federal Government dominating the States. Matters on the concurrent list such as education was taken over by the Federal Government at primary, secondary and tertiary levels. States cannot set up universiti­es without federal approval which was not hitherto the case under the 1963 constituti­onal regional arrangemen­t. University admission is also being centralize­d under JAMB. Land tenure system was harmonized throughout the country and entrenched into the Constituti­on which was not the case before.

6. Nigeria is now in its 16th year of post military administra­tion. Civil rule and democracy are being consolidat­ed. It is for this reason in my view that the clamour for restructur­ing, fiscal federalism and resource control is increasing. I must admit that I see sense in the proposal for restructur­ing as articulate­d by the South West delegates to the 2014 National Conference. Essentiall­y, they want a return to Regionalis­m with adjustment­s in the actual number of the regions. They want the six geo political zones of NC, NE, NW, SE, SS and SW to be the regions. These zones are very carefully calculated cultural affinity groupings for the purpose of political expediency. They would like also to see 18 more states created to take care of the interests of minorities.

7. The new regional groups under the six geo-political zones should be subjected to plebiscite to ascertain the wish of the people to belong to such grouping. No community should be prevailed upon to accept inclusion in an area they do not wish to belong. Under such circumstan­ces boundary adjustment­s can be made. The fear of domination in the zones must be eliminated. There will then be a total of 54 states which will replace local authoritie­s as third tier of government.

8. The south west delegates also called for the creation of regional police in order to maintain law and order based on the culture of the people and knowledge of the environmen­t. They proposed collegiate leadership under which the Presidency will be rotating along the zones to give all and sundry a feeling of belonging. The American presidenti­al system will no longer serve useful purpose as it is very expensive to operate. The salary and allowances paid to the legislator­s rapidly drain government resources. There is a compelling need to revert to parliament­ary system with unicameral legislatur­e under which the legislator­s will operate on part time basis.

9. Economic realities of the present day Nigeria will have to be considered deeply in assessing the move for a return to regionalis­m. The 50% derivation principle which the Regions retained under the 1963 Constituti­on cannot be feasible now. The Federal Government has enormous responsibi­lities to shoulder in the execution of national security, defense, foreign affairs, communicat­ions and other pressing responsibi­lities. There are arguments that under the internatio­nal law offshore and deep sea oil production belong to the Federal Government. Only on shore oil production will attract derivation to the oil producing States. Land, apart from being a factor of production, is a very important resource which provides lots of opportunit­ies for developmen­t. Experts should be commission­ed to critically examine all available resources and income of the country and devise an equitable revenue sharing formula between the Federal Government and federating units under any new political dispensati­on.

10. Finally, the persistent call for restructur­ing with a view to ensuring the proper operation of the federal system of government, the so called true federalism, is quite in order. As I see it, its intention is indeed to strengthen national unity rather than to allow the operation of the unitary system in the guise of federal structure to frustrate working relations between the federating units and the Federal Government. There should be tenacity of purpose to correct past mistakes at all levels. God bless Nigeria. Amen.

 ??  ?? Map of Nigeria
Map of Nigeria
 ??  ?? President Muhammadu Buhari
President Muhammadu Buhari

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria