Daily Trust

Hiroshima 2014: A case for world free of nuclear weapons

- By Anthony Maliki, who was in Japan

The 8th ministeria­l meeting of the NonProlife­ration and Disarmamen­t Initiative (NPDI) was held in Hiroshima, Japan were the Atomic bomb was dropped on August 6, 1945 to herald the end of the World War II. This report looks at the outcome of the meeting especially humanitari­an effects of nuclear arms. survivors called Hibakushas and invite the world’s political leaders to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki to also witness the consequenc­es with their own eyes.

The declaratio­n states that quantitati­ve reductions should be accompanie­d by steps towards reducing the role and significan­ce of nuclear weapons in security strategies and military doctrines. These steps are important contributi­ons towards the goal of complete nuclear disarmamen­t and will be mutually reinforcin­g with further quantitati­ve reductions. It states that while it acknowledg­e steps that have been taken in this regard, the NPDI urged nuclearwea­pon states to further reduce the role of nuclear weapons and urged others who have not done so to start reducing the role of nuclear weapons in their security strategies and military doctrines.

But the NPDI said it is deeply concerned and frustrated with the continued stalemate in the Conference on Disarmamen­t (CD). “We regret that the CD has failed to fulfill its mandate as the single multilater­al disarmamen­t negotiatio­ns forum of the internatio­nal community for more than 18 years. It is time for the CD’s Member States to take bold steps towards fulfilling the CD’s mandate and resume negotiatio­ns,” it stated.

As an essential step towards a world free of nuclear weapons, the ministers said the immediate commenceme­nt of negotiatio­ns on a non-discrimina­tory, multilater­al and universall­y and effectivel­y verifiable treaty to ban the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices that serves both disarmamen­t and non-proliferat­ion purposes remains a priority. As such, it said it welcome and look forward to the work of the Group of Government­al Experts (GGE) on this issue, which just ended its first session in Geneva recently. It therefore urged the CD to launch negotiatio­ns on such a treaty as soon as possible. Pending the conclusion of such negotiatio­ns, it stated, all nuclear-weapon States and other States in possession of nuclear weapons should declare and maintain a moratorium on the production The 8th ministeria­l meeting of the Non-Proliferat­ion and Disarmamen­t Initiative (NPDI) which held in Hiroshima, Japan on April 12th turned its attention to the catastroph­ic humanitari­an consequenc­es of the use of any nuclear weapon on mankind.

The 12-member nations of the body therefore called in strong terms for the nearly 69-year record of non-use of nuclear weapons be extended forever.

In what could be termed “Hiroshima Declaratio­n” the NPDI establishe­d four years ago was also worried about the consequenc­es of the use of nuclear weapons as expressed in the 2010 Non Proliferat­ion Treaty (NPT) Review Conference Final Document.

In a statement the body explained that: “The catastroph­ic humanitari­an impact of nuclear weapons fundamenta­lly underpins all work to succeed in our non-proliferat­ion efforts and to achieve nuclear disarmamen­t in pursuit of a more secure world.”

NPDI member-countries are Australia, Canada, Chile, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherland­s, Nigeria, the Philippine­s, Poland, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

The ministers in the meeting held in Hiroshima which witnessed the devastatio­n of the Atomic bomb dropped on August 6, 1945 said the humanitari­an impact of nuclear weapons should be inclusive and universal as well as a catalyst for a united global action towards the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons.

Indeed the NPDI in the declaratio­n was categorica­l about why the meeting was held in Hiroshima. It said: “we gathered here in Hiroshima, where an atomic bomb was dropped for the first time in human history, and witnessed first-hand the catastroph­ic humanitari­an consequenc­es of an atomic bombing that last even to this present day.” It also said they are touched very deeply by the testimonie­s of atomic bomb of fissile material for use in nuclear weapons.

Besides, the NPDI, as a group of non-nuclear-weapon States which are committed to promoting nuclear disarmamen­t and non-proliferat­ion, is following with grave concern the situation in Ukraine, which has been the subject of intensive discussion­s in NPDI as well as at the UN General Assembly.

Also, the NPDI said it expects internatio­nal obligation­s and commitment­s to be respected, including the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non Proliferat­ion of Nuclear Weapons.

Also contributi­ng to the nuclear disarmamen­t issue, the Chairperso­n, Hiroshima Peace Culture Foundation and Secretary General, Mayors for Peace, Mr. Yasuyoshi Komizo said the greatest responsibi­lity towards nuclear control and eliminatio­n lies with the leaders in the United Nations (UN).

He said countries with nuclear weapons must think about the humanitari­an catastroph­e it would cost the world rather show for military might. The chairperso­n said though people have their cultural, religious and ethnic difference­s, the overall considerat­ion of belonging to a human community should be uppermost in the issue of nuclear weapons disarmamen­t.

Komizo who worked at the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with its former Director General Mohammed el-Baradie pointed out that nuclear nations must have a change of heart towards the effect on humanity.

He told journalist­s during a dialogue in Hiroshima that sustainabl­e peace cuts across all generation­s but the younger generation must be involved in the campaign against nuclear weapons.

Besides, the Commission­er, Japan Atomic Energy Commission­er, Nobuyasu Abe expressed concern about the incapacity of the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to adequately monitor nuclear developmen­ts across the globe due to limited budget.

Also, he said though there are fissile materials in Japan in the past forty years for research purposes and so far the country has not developed nuclear weapons since then shows that it has no intention to do so now or in the future.

He expressed satisfacto­ry with the NPDI meeting in Hiroshima saying for asking countries with nuclear weapons to join in the negotiatio­ns especially US and Russia is a step forward and the focus on the terrible humanitari­an consequenc­es of the use of nuclear weapons is a strong reference at the meeting.

Abe said the call on nuclear nations to be transparen­t in their dealings is a good step forward and for the meeting to hold in Hiroshima to meet with the people hear and listen to the people and the survivors in addition to look at the “legacies” of the Atomic bomb is a unique opportunit­y.

In Hiroshima, when the bomb was detonated, in a swoop, within two kilometres of the hypo centre most buildings were totally destroyed, about 2000 to 6500 children are orphaned with about 70, 000 burnt to ashes. And within few months, people others died from leukemia and other infections from the bomb.

The humanitari­an consequenc­es of the Atomic bomb could be best appreciate­d with the testimony of one of the victims Ms. Emiko Okada who was eight years old when it was dropped in Hiroshima in 1945 said the situation was frightenin­g than one could ever imagine. Even after 69 years, Okada’s emotions are still high and could recall clearly events of the day where in a flash the whole city was destroyed and people crying for water and nothing nobody could help.

She who lost her elder sister on that day said her younger brother is still traumatise­d about the bombing and is still withdrawn uptill now with stresses of some dementia and never wanted to discuss about the event.

Okada said: “The crisis I have seen in Hiroshima is enough. Why must people suffer? People were vomiting not only blood but something black. I hope such thing does not happen again.”

Ironically, the direct victims of the Atomic bomb are the ones calling for peace and the need to stop nuclear proliferat­ion and disarmamen­t despite the fact that they witnessed the devastatio­n of the A-bomb.

 ??  ?? Remains of the Hiroshima Prefectura­l Industrial Hall after the atomic bomb on August 6, 1945
Remains of the Hiroshima Prefectura­l Industrial Hall after the atomic bomb on August 6, 1945

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria