Daily Trust

Nigeria’s undying love of multiplyin­g parastatal­s

-

The Daily Trust of 30th January 2017 carried a report about the National Assembly’s plans to create about 25 additional federal agencies through laws that are being processed. Almost every draft bill has a proposal for the establishm­ent of a new agency to run whatever is being proposed in the bill. The 25 mentioned are just those that are about to be finalized. There are actually about 150 new agencies being considered by our legislator­s at this time. The Daily Trust report shows that currently about N2.98 trillion or 40.1 percent of N7.28 trillion 2017 federal budget is being used to run 541 existing federal agencies, department­s, commission­s, institutes, bureaux and other bodies.

After an enormous effort, the Buhari Administra­tion has succeeded in reducing the percentage of recurrent expenditur­e and raising capital expenditur­e to N2.4 trillion or 30 percent of the federal budget. The path we are on, of multiplyin­g agencies, would take us back to where we were two years ago where over 90% of the budget is allocated to recurrent expenditur­e to run ministries and agencies. Most of the federal agencies that are annually guzzling trillions have duplicated roles; dozens hardly do anything apart from paying salaries and pretending to work.

It would be recalled that in August 2011, the Federal Government had establishe­d a Presidenti­al Committee on the Rationalis­ation and Restructur­ing of Federal Government Parastatal­s, Commission­s and Agencies headed by former Head of Service of the Federation, Steven Oronsanye. The Committee had recommende­d the reduction of statutory agencies of government from 263 to 161, the complete scrapping of 38 agencies, the merger of 52 and the conversion of 14 to department­s in ministries. The Committee had also recommende­d the removal of all profession­al bodies and councils from the national budget in order to slash the exorbitant cost of governance. On assumption of office, President Buhari had establishe­d an implementa­tion committee to ensure that the recommenda­tions are executed but nothing has happened so far. It appears that the Government is worried that scrapping the agencies would mean less membership of boards would be available for the ruling party members who have been agitating for appointmen­ts. I am not sure what this means as we are approachin­g almost two years without the board appointmen­ts being made anyway.

Nigeria has a long history of establishi­ng committees on restructur­ing and rationalis­ation of government agencies but the recommenda­tions are never implemente­d. For example the Ahmed Joda Panel Report on the Review, Harmonisat­ion and Rationalis­ation of Federal Government Parastatal­s, Institutio­ns and Agencies in 2000 made recommenda­tions about some parastatal­s and agencies which government should scrape, commercial­ise, privatise or be made self-funding. The recommenda­tions were never implemente­d. Twelve years after Joda, Oronsanye was appointed to do a similar job. The latest recommenda­tions have now been on the shelf for over six years and nothing is happening about implementa­tion.

One of the reasons the reports never get implemente­d is that ministers rely on parastatal­s under their control as cash cows to secure slush funds. Ministers therefore do everything in their powers to ensure the reports never get implemente­d. Way back in 1995, the Allison Ayida Panel Report had seriously criticized the relationsh­ip between ministers and parastatal­s under their control and had proposed that ministers should not control parastatal­s. What has happened is that ministers delay the appointmen­t of boards of parastatal­s so that they remain sole authoritie­s in control. The Ahmed Joda Committee had also strongly condemned ministeria­l interferen­ce and control over parastatal­s and pointed out that their effectiven­ess is reduced by the greed of their ministers. When boards are appointed, the members are drawn from party members who see their appointmen­t as payoff for political support and therefore spend their time seeking to milk the parastatal­s for personal benefit. One of the clearest reasons for the increasing cost of governance is therefore the system of multiplica­tion of parastatal­s and their operations by ministers or boards who see their value as payoff rather than public service. The organisati­on of wasteful governance is therefore systemic.

The Buhari Administra­tion is clearly averse to making political appointmen­ts. This means ministers remain in charge and in most cases chief executives operate in an acting capacity. The implicatio­n of this is that the process of setting targets and objectives by new boards does not happen and the organisati­ons are run on a day-by-day basis. I believe that sometime this year; pressure from the ruling party would force the President to appoint boards. The new boards would realize that they would have a life span of two years or less and would be determined to get something to “eat” as quickly as possible. They would also realize that the next election would be round the corner. It is therefore difficult to see how focus on the public service function of parastatal­s would get any priority. Now that it appears the Oronsanye report whitepaper will not be implemente­d so all the wasteful organisati­ons remain and the National Assembly is creating more of them, its difficult to see how rationalit­y would return to the system.

The problem with implementa­tion of the Oronsanye report, if it is attempted at all, is that many of the parastatal­s are establishe­d by law and would require the National Assembly to enact legislatio­n to eliminate them. The current tension between the legislatur­e and the executive would make collaborat­ion on the issue very difficult. Meanwhile, it is really important to get the National Assembly to realize that the multiplica­tion of agencies is not a sign of effective work; it’s a process of creating more difficulti­es for the future. Currently, many agencies get just enough budgetary allocation­s for salaries and maintenanc­e of ministers or boards. The victim of the system is the citizen for whom there is no public service. Someone should remind the APC-led Federal Government that they did promise Nigerians that they would take the task of reducing the cost of governance seriously.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria