Daily Trust

Breathing lessons (I)

- By Huzaifa Jega

Clearly, our brains are hardwired for sectional predisposi­tion or partisansh­ip – and how that skews our perception­s in public life is becoming clear too, especially in the light of recent events in the country. The Nnamdi Kanu/ IPOB saga, for instance, is underscori­ng just how blind the “us-versus-them” paradigm can make people when they try to process political informatio­n. Once this sectional mentality kicks in, the brain almost automatica­lly pre-filters facts – even noncontrov­ersial ones – that offend our political sensibilit­ies.

The sociology of human civilisati­on has painstakin­gly made homogeneit­y the primary anchor of social, intellectu­al, political and spiritual identities over millions of years of social evolution. The Law of Survival has also taught man, by blood and iron, that security is the one overriding sacrament that can never be compromise­d on – and that even an enlightene­d awareness can be subordinat­ed to the base impulses of primordial­ity. Homogeneit­y aggregates the will of a community into a unified force streamline­d accordingl­y in the pursuit of common interests; hence it is the most reliable index of security. Man wants to be able to gather his mind and his strengths, address weaknesses and threats with a view to growing ‘have’ or ‘become’, in obeisance to that compulsive objective of evolution towards something that is of greater value in the grand scheme of nature – maybe something in tune with the idea of Nietzsche’s Ubermensch­e.

The Theory of Evolution suggests that life began in the ‘soupy seas’ and therefore the first marine creature that emerged on land to sire terrestria­l life had to learn to breathe anew or die. Akin to this physiologi­cal adaptation, evidence is mounting to the effect that humanity is at the threshold of a great sociologic­al evolutiona­ry bridge – the type that may warrant a new philosophi­cal adaptation on the pain of extinction. Perhaps I am simply parroting my own subjective understand­ing of biology and its social auxiliarie­s. But what if this hypothesis is true?

A new set of civil principles must hence guide human social interactio­ns if it is to survive. Once you trip the livewire of human sectional identity – this trigger, this cue, you become a part of the ‘usversus-them,’ equation – it’s almost like one’s consciousn­ess becomes recoordina­ted in how it views people and ideas. Our tendency towards sectional partisansh­ip is itself a product of evolution – forming groups is how early humans survived. That’s helpful when trying to master a difficult environmen­t with prehistori­c technology or the lack thereof. It’s less so when trying to foster a functional society in today’s Nigeria.

Understand­ing the other side’s point of view, even if one disagrees with it, is central to compromise, policymaki­ng, and any hope for civility in civic life. So if our brains are blinding us to informatio­n that challenges our sectional predisposi­tion, how can we ever hope to find common ground? It’s a challenge that is stumping both the masses and the leadership that represents them. Policy decisions, administra­tive responsibi­lities and other state functions are functions in name only – opportunit­ies for politician­s and sectional demagogues to grandstand rather than talk with each other. And the political discussion, even among those well versed in the issues, largely exists in parallel red and blue universes, mental spheres with few or no common facts to serve as starting points.

But rather than despair, we can see the causes of this as reason for hope, raising tantalisin­g prospects; with enough understand­ing of what exactly makes us so vulnerable to partisansh­ip, can we reshape our political environmen­t to access the better profiles of our nature?

Currently, ongoing research is testing one of partisansh­ip’s more frightenin­g features which its tendency for allowing us, even pushing us, to dehumanise those we categorise as “them”. The willingnes­s of human beings to dehumanise is often mentioned alongside some of the darkest chapters of history – the Nazi Holocaust, the genocide in Rwanda and yes… the Biafra Civil War – when political establishm­ents went to great lengths to build anger and animosity against “the other”. In our own case as Nigerians, much relies on a personal/sectional identity reinforced since birth.

But to create the base “us and them” structure, none of that is needed. The brain is so hardwired to build such groups that anyone on the street can instantly become partisan.

And it happens subconscio­usly too – once you are primed by something, and it could be the flimsiest of triggers, to be ‘one thing’, you become dyed-in-the-wool against the ‘other thing’. Nothing needs to be at stake. But within moments, instantpar­tisans will like their compatriot­s better than they like the other guys.

You are more likely to look at someone who shares the same beliefs and values with a human face – so to speak. The other side responds the same way. One would also be inclined more towards sympathisi­ng and empathisin­g with people they share a certain part of their identity with - that is the reason, I suppose, you find more listening ears, better concurrenc­e and the works in the demographi­c cluster you belong to in terms of personal identity. That is why, I suppose, Nnamdi Kanu’s cause is a hit with the Igbo section of the Nigerian population but an anathema to the collective consciousn­ess of the incipient Nigerian nation.

But when it comes to politics, how troubled should we be by this reality? Nigeria’s sectional divide is as old as its independen­ce from the British in 1960 or even its very foundation in 1914. It is neither feasible nor desirable to hope for a broad-based national consensus on every issue. Even if we all worked from the same set of facts, and even if we all understood those facts perfectly, difference­s of opinion would – and should – remain.

Those opinions are not the problem – the trouble is when we are so blinded by our partisansh­ip that it overrides reason, and apparently that is happening all the time. So, where do we go from here?

Huzaifa Jega wrote this piece from Abuja

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria