The Guardian (Nigeria)

Single party structure won’t work ( 2)

- By Eric Teniola

THE question was proposed by the President, and at that point, I am afraid, I rather put the cat among the pigeons by moving an amendment to substitute ‘ as soon as practicabl­e’ for the date ‘ 1956’. This is what I said: we from the Northern Region never intended, nor do we intend, to retard the progress of any Region. Nor do we say that those who demand self- government, if it is for their own Region alone, are wrong. Far from it. For, after all, every community is the best judge of its own situation. In this regard, Mr. President, the people of the North are the best judges of their own situation and we feel that in our present situation we cannot commit ourselves to fixing a date for the attainment of self- government. We are fully aware of all the implicatio­ns involved and we want to make it abundantly clear that the destiny of the North is in the hands of the people of the North. We of the North wish our form of self- government, once granted, to be such that its attainment should give us no cause for eventual regret. It would be very unwise, Sir, if, before we fix a date for attainment of self- government for Nigeria, we do not think of the condition of things obtaining in this country today. It is true that we politician­s always delight in talking loosely about the unity of Nigeria. Sixty years ago, there was no country called Nigeria. What is now Nigeria consisted of a number of large and small communitie­s all of which were different in their outlooks and beliefs. The advents of the British and of the Western education has not materially altered the situation and these many and varies communitie­s have not knit themselves into a composite unit. Sir, whatever Nigerians may say, the British people have done them a great service by bringing all the different communitie­s of Nigeria together. The great day came with the introducti­on of the Richards’s Constituti­on in 1947 when, for the first time in our history, indigenous citizens of the North sat side by side with the South to legislate for one Nigeria and share in the discussion of Nigeria affairs. That was in 1947. Meanwhile, Sir, our comrades in the South had been taking part in the discussion of their own affairs in the Legislatur­e as far back as 1922. Sir, the 1947 Constituti­on was to last nine years, very probably in order to give the North sufficient time to learn. That Constituti­on, Sir, was revised after the North had gained only two years’ experience and now we have a Constituti­on which has been barely a year in existence. I must say here, Mr. President, motions like the one which I am now trying to amend, are deliberate­ly designed to destroy the happy inter- Regional relationsh­ip which the present Constituti­on is rapidly building up. Though I realize that motions of this nature are merely an expression of opinion, yet I feel that they can serve no purpose other than doing harm and causing ill- feeling. I have my reasons for so saying. For many years the outside world has been led to regard Northern Nigeria as a back- ward country, where all the people are conservati­ve to the extreme and unreceptiv­e of modern ideas. One has only to read the local papers and to remember utterances made by some Southern Nigerians in the past for a confirmati­on of my statement. Before we commit ourselves and the people we represent in such matters, we must, I repeat, we must seek the mandate of the country. As representa­tives of the people, we from the North feel that in all major issues such as this one, we are in duty bound to consult those we represent, so that when we speak we know we are voicing the views of the nation. If the Honourable Members from the West and East speak to this motion unamended, for their people, I must say here and now, Sir, that we from the North have been given no such mandate by our people. No Honourable Member can therefore criticise the Northern Legislator­s for refusing to associate themselves with such an arbitrary motion fixing, as it does, a definite date for the attainment of national self- government. We in the North are working very hard towards self- government although we are late in assimilati­ng Western education. It is our resolute intention to build our developmen­t on sound and lasting foundation­s so that thy will be lasting. With things in their present state in Nigeria, the Northern Region does not intend to accept the invitation to commit suicide. Unless we Nigerians can prove to ourselves and to the world outside what we want, I cannot see how people can be expected to regard our demand seriously. It is not uncommon for people in this country, for a group of people to sit together and demand self government. Some are even demanding it now, immediatel­y. Any country which accepts self- government must do so with its eyes wide open and the problem, therefore, of one section of the country imposing its will on the others does not arise. I move this amendment, which, in my humble opinion, is much more appropriat­e if the question of self government for Nigeria is at all to be discussed at this stage. I do so, Sir, without any fear or misgivings that if the original motion were to be carried, it would automatica­lly be binding on all Regions. Far from it! As I said earlier in my remarks, a private member’s motion is intended primarily to give that member and others an opportunit­y of expressing their views on a given subject. Numberless motions of this nature will not achieve self- government for the un- unified Nigeria. Self- government for Nigeria can be demanded and obtained only when its meaning is fully understood by all the mass of this country. Let all the implicatio­ns be thrashed out and agreement reached by the leading citizens of all three Regions. This is the primary objective to which we have addressed ourselves and, in doing so, to show to the country our fitness to discharge the heavy responsibi­lity we have begun to assume. Then, once this objective has been attained, we will be on the safe side in demanding self- government”. Thereafter the London Conference was held to decide Nigeria’s independen­ce. Those who went for the London Conference later were, from the Action Group- Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola, Mr. I. J. Dosunmu, Mr. E. O. Eyo, Mr. S. O. Ighodaro, Mr. S. G. Ikoku, Mr. A. O. Lawson, Mr. A. Rosiji and Chief F. R. A. Williams. Dr. E. M. I. Endeley, Galega, Fon, of Bali and Mr. J. T. Ndze from the Cameroun National Congress, Mr. J. N. Foncha from the Cameroun National Congress, Mr. P. M. Kale from the Cameroun People’s Party all attended. From the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons were Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe GCFR, Alhaji Adegokeade­labu, Mr. T. O. S. Benson, Dr. S. E. Imoke, Dr. K. O. Mbadiwe, Mr. R. A. Njoku, Dr. Michael I. Okpara, Mr. D. C. Osadebey, Mr. Babatunde Olowofoyek­u and Dr. Sanya Onabamiro. From the Northern Elements Progressiv­e Union were Mallam Aminu Kano and Mallam Ibrahim Imam.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria