THISDAY

As FG, Power Investors’ Rift Deepens

The controvers­y between the federal government and the power investors over the obvious failure of both parties to meet the terms of the privatisat­ion agreement has deepened with the recent opposition of the distributi­on companies to the government’s plan

- An Electricit­y Transforme­r

he 11 electricit­y distributi­on companies in the country recently kicked against an alleged attempt by the federal government to escrow their accounts as part of the measures to resolve the liquidity challenges that have crippled power supply in recent months. The Discos, under the aegis of the Associatio­n of Nigeria Electricit­y Distributo­rs (ANED), accused the federal government of failing to fulfil the terms of the privatisat­ion agreement, including the provision of N100 billion subsidy. They argued that any attempt to escrow the Discos’ account would be tantamount to nationalis­ation or expropriat­ion of the Discos.

Since power supply worsened in recent months, the Discos have embarked on a spirited campaign to absolve themselves of any blame for the apparent collapse of the power sector, which had prompted Africa’s richest man and president of Dangote Group, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, to call on the federal government to cancel the power privatisat­ion. Dangote alleged that the private investors “went in without even understand­ing what they were doing.”

Blame

While the Discos blame the federal government and electricit­y consumers for the failure of the sector, the government has also accused the companies of frustratin­g its effort to activate their agreements in the Transition­al Electricit­y Market (TEM), which should bind them to objective service delivery.

For instance, the Minister of Power, Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola, had challenged the Discos to also use the same campaign, which they have mounted in the form of advertoria­ls, to tell Nigerians that they refused to submit their annual statement of accounts to the Nigerian Electricit­y Regulatory Commission (NERC) as required by the power reform law.

While the Discos are insisting that there is a huge revenue shortfall threatenin­g the power sector, the government is of the view that the fact that the Discos are hiding their books from the regulator is a strong indication that they are not telling the government and Nigerians the whole truth about their financial state.

According to the Discos, the sector has a revenue shortfall of close to N90 billion as a result of the federal government’s inability to meet its commitment­s in the performanc­e agreement with the investors who acquired the assets during the power privatisat­ion.

ANED’s Executive Director in charge of Research and Advocacy, Mr. Sunday Oduntan, had once argued that the performanc­e agreement had stipulated that there would be cost reflective tariffs from November 1, 2013. But he said this never happened, as “R2 customer class was politicall­y frozen and collection losses removed in 2015” by the previous administra­tion for the purpose of winning 2015 elections.

Oduntan added, “Sculpting or under-recovery of cost will result in N164 billion revenue shortfall, for the period of 2016 through 2018. Delay in reflecting costs means a growing increase in deficits.”

Oduntan also alleged that the federal government committed that tariffs should reflect reality but argued that tariffs had not changed, despite the devaluatio­n of naira from N197 to N305, while inflation has also increased from nine per cent projected in the performanc­e agreement to 17.9 per cent.

According to him, the performanc­e agreement was hinged on projected generation of between 5,000 megawatts and 7,500 megawatts between 2014 and 2016 but generation, according to the companies, averaged between 2,000mw and 3,000mw during this period due to pipeline vandalism and transmissi­on constraint­s, which they claimed were outside their commitment­s.

The distributi­on companies had also revealed that the generation companies were owed in excess of N184 billion, contrary to the performanc­e agreement, which guaranteed the credit worthiness support of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) by the Nigerian Bulk Electricit­y Trading Plc (NBET), also known as the Bulk Trader.

The investors also hinted that the government made a commitment to guarantee them increased access to gas supply, but said there had been no improvemen­t in gas supply.

They argued that the performanc­e agreement also guaranteed them clean balance sheets to ensure that they have the ability to borrow funds to invest in power sector.

However, the reality, according to them, is that the sector is operating at a loss since two and a half years plus with no bank willing to lend money to them, as the banking sector is already exposed to oil, gas and power sectors by over N3 trillion.

Apart from the over 3,000MW lost to vandalism, the Discos noted that the MDAs were indebted to the sector to the tune of N100 billion.

Countercla­im

While the generation and distributi­on companies have blamed the worsening power supply on gas shortages and grid instabilit­y caused by weak transmissi­on infrastruc­ture, the Transmissi­on Company of Nigeria (TCN) say the Discos are to blame for rejecting power allocated to them.

However, gas suppliers have argued that there is enough gas to generate power but that the generation companies cannot pay for gas.

On their part, the Gencos have argued that they are not able to pay for gas because they are being owed by NBET for the power the Gencos generated into the National Grid.

NBET, on its part, has claimed that it has insufficie­nt fund to pay the Gencos because the Discos make under-payment for the power they buy and distribute to their customers.

The excuse by the distributi­on companies is that the tariffs paid by customers are not cost-reflective enough for them to recover the actual cost of power and remit to NBET. They also blame their revenue shortfall on MDA debts and failure of customers to even pay at all.

Escrow Account Option

To resolve the liquidity challenge in the power sector, the government recently unveiled a N701 billion interventi­on fund to be spread over a period of three years. But the Discos say the package could worsen the funding situation.

The government was also said to have threatened to escrow the accounts of the Discos to ensure that money realised from the power sector is paid to all the members of the value chain – gas suppliers, generation companies, distributi­on companies, Transmissi­on Company of Nigeria, and the regulators.

But the Discos opposed the move, saying that it would also send very wrong signals to investors that Nigeria is not fully open for private sector investment but is still partial to the old habits of nationalis­ation, which prevents the injection of cheap and needed capital that is critical to the rehabilita­tion and improvemen­t of electricit­y infrastruc­ture.

Oduntan said, “You cannot have a supposedly private sector-owned and managed business in which the government now seizes control of its revenues. It is a contradict­ion in terms and practice. The same principle applies to any considerat­ion of regulation­s or government action that intrudes into corporate responsibi­lities of procuremen­t, financial management or personnel management.

“To date, the government has not met the privatisat­ion transactio­n foundation­al requiremen­ts of providing N100 billion in subsidy to the sector. Indeed, any attempt at escrowing our accounts runs counter to the objectives of the National Electricit­y Power Policy, 2001 (NEPP) and the Electric Power Sector Reform Act, 2005 (2005), of a private sector-owned and managed electricit­y sector.”

Government Response

However, Fashola has accused the Discos of becoming a stumbling block to the smooth regulation of the power sector by NERC, saying there are instances where the Discos have by their actions impinged on NERC’s regulatory responsibi­lities. He had also alleged that the Discos were largely responsibl­e for the delay in the settlement of debts owed them by the MDAs.

The minister specifical­ly noted that the Discos had, irrespecti­ve of their excuses, failed to tell Nigerians that for three years, they did not submit their audited financial reports to NERC. He alleged that when NERC wanted to activate their contractua­l obligation­s as contained in the TEM, the Discos dragged the regulatory agency to court and frustrated its efforts.

“Advert should also have told the Nigerian public how many Discos have gone to court to frustrate the attempt by NERC to hold them to their contracts so that they can pay the Gencos who have been sacrificin­g, the gas producers who have not received payment and who have continued to act patriotic,” Fashola had said.

He added, “It is important to remind all of us that the privatisat­ion exercise that transferre­d the distributi­on companies was not held as a contract with an associatio­n. It was between Nigeria and the distributi­on company. So, while I respect the right of an associatio­n, the constituti­on guarantees the freedom of associatio­n, the federal government will not pay over N100 billion to anyone under the aegis of an associatio­n. That is not how to solve it.”

Fashola insisted that the government will treat the debt on individual company basis upon government’s honest verificati­on of the claims and not with their associatio­n, adding that his request for them to submit records of their claims has been largely rebuffed by the Discos.

“We won’t pay estimate. The figure must remain clear in naira and kobo terms. And we will do our work. I think that the advert that the Discos issued should also have conveyed informatio­n to the Nigerian public about how many of them have supplied details of their audited accounts for the last three years. And we have been asking them to provide it.”

Capacity Issue

Indeed, since the power assets were handed over to the new investors on November 1, 2013, some of the Discos have demonstrat­ed lack of capacity to run these assets. Rather than explore other funding options, some of these companies have resorted to extorting consumers through exorbitant estimated billings, concealmen­t of their books from NERC, blackmaili­ng government, and flouting market rules.

On several instances of breaches of the market rules, NERC has responded with appropriat­e sanctions against erring Discos.

But despite NERC’s sanctions, some of the Discos have continued to flout the market rules by extorting customers through exorbitant estimated bills. Ironically, while some Discos have embarked on massive rollout of free prepaid meters to their customers, others, which operate under the same market conditions, have suspended the provision of prepaid meters, citing high cost of forex difficulti­es.

Observers say, though the government shares part of the blame, there is indeed, a lack of sincerity on the part of most Discos, who have resorted to blackmaili­ng the government and consumers.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria