THISDAY

Startling Revelation­s at Public Hearing into Abuse of Due Process

The House of Representa­tives Committee on Public Procuremen­t recently conducted a public hearing into the alleged breach of the Public Procuremen­t Act 2007 in the engagement of consultant­s for pre-shipment inspection, monitoring of crude and gas exports.

-

The Public Procuremen­t Act (PPA) of 2007 was enacted to ensure probity, accountabi­lity and transparen­cy in the procuremen­t process, through the applicatio­n of fair, competitiv­e and transparen­t standards and practices for the procuremen­t and disposal of public assets and services. Enforced by the Bureau of Public Procuremen­t, the Act is also intended to promote cost effectiven­ess and profession­alism in the public sector procuremen­t system.

The PPA is considered one of the most effective tools that can be deployed in the anti-corruption fight, as it is also intended to ensure that only companies that adhere to regulation­s and enacted legislatio­ns secure government contracts to provide goods and/ or services.

The Act however continues to be violated often by government officials themselves, allegedly so, when awarding contracts. They are said to willfully award contracts to firms that have defaulted in their tax requiremen­ts, and who do not meet their obligation­s to the Pension Commission of Nigeria, Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund and Industrial Training Fund, among others.

In some cases, such as found during a recent investigat­ive hearing into procuremen­t processes in the Niger Delta amnesty programme, firms that were not registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), were discovered to have been awarded contracts running into millions of dollars.

The latest discovery by the House of Representa­tives Committee on Public Procuremen­t is that companies that did not meet the PPA requiremen­ts were engaged by the Ministry of Finance as Pre-shipment Inspection Agents (PIAs) for pre-shipment inspection and monitoring of crude oil and gas exports from Nigeria.

Allegation­s of Breach of PPA The investigat­ion followed a motion on March 1, 2017, and sponsored by Hon. Babatunde Kolawole (Ondo PDP) in view of allegation­s that the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, had overseen a process that saw to the selection of non-responsive companies that did not meet basic statutory requiremen­ts like possession of valid PENCOM Certificat­es as required by the Public Procuremen­t Act.

President Muhammadu Buhari, in June 2015, in a memo obtained by THISDAY had approved that the Finance Ministry could process engagement of pre-shipment inspectors through selective tendering approved by the Bureau for Public Procuremen­t (BPP). He specifical­ly directed that only companies that are experience­d and already active preshipmen­t agents should be shortliste­d, thus rejected a recommenda­tion, in the memo, that new set of pre-shipment inspection agents should be engaged. Due to the directive, 65 companies were selected to participat­e in the bidding stage.

Interestin­gly, however, in what has been interprete­d as disobedien­ce to a presidenti­al directive, the Minister of Finance, in December 2015, reportedly cancelled the tendering process on the grounds of lack of transparen­cy, accountabi­lity and on the

basis of a formal complaint from the BPP.

The Ministry thereafter initiated a fresh tendering process, which was fraught with allegation­s of abuses, lawmaker Kolawole noted, adding that the entire pre-shipment process was being undermined, and could lead to significan­t revenue losses.

Understand­ing the Pre-shipment Act While the Ministry of Finance has taken over the process of pre-shipment inspection of crude oil and gas exports from Nigeria, the pre-shipment of Exports Act 1996, actually puts the responsibi­lity on the Central Bank of Nigeria. Section 13 of the Act reads (1): The Central Bank shall be charged generally with the responsibi­lity for the administra­tion of the provisions of this Act. (2) The Central Bank shall make regulation­s and prescribe such forms as may be required for the purpose of carrying out the intendment of this Act.

The Act also provides that a special account for the purpose shall be establishe­d and maintained by the Central Bank, for “all expenses relating to the remunerati­on, fees and other charges payable to the inspecting agents shall be defrayed from the special account”. The account is named Nigerian Export Supervisio­n Scheme (NESS) account.

Thus, the role of the Ministry of Finance in pre-shipment inspection, according to the Act, is to serve on a technical committee to assist the CBN in its administra­tion of the Act. Other agencies on the technical committee include the Federal Ministry of Commerce, the Federal Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Petroleum Resources (Inspectora­te Division), the Federal Ministry of Agricultur­e and Rural Developmen­t, the Nigerian Customs Service; and the National Agency for Food and Drug Administra­tion and Control.

It is therefore an aberration, the lawmakers reckoned, that the Finance ministry has completely taken over the administra­tion of the Act, and relegated the CBN to a member of the technical committee.

Revelation­s at the Investigat­ive hearing

The Minister of Finance, Adeosun failed to honor the invitation of the Committee, on Monday, to explain the alleged infraction­s, she however sent the Ministry’s Director of Legal Services, Mr. Chris Gabriel, to represent her. Gabriel however told the committee that he had no position paper to present on the issues raised, as he got the directive to represent the minister, very late.

Chairman of the Committee, Hon. Olu- wole Oke (Osun PDP), lamented that the minister failed to honour the invitation of the parliament despite letters sent to her. He also frowned at the many alleged infraction­s of the PPA and other legislatio­ns, at a period when the government had put the anti-corruption fight at the fore-front of its administra­tion.

Hon. Gabriel Onyewife (Anambra APGA) expressed disappoint­ment at the manner members of the executive disregard invitation­s to public hearings by the legislatur­e. His sentiment was echoed by several members, who voted that the representa­tive of the minister should not be allowed to stand in for her, particular­ly as he was not prepared to tackle the questions that could arise in the course of the investigat­ive hearing.

While presenting the opening remarks, Speaker of the House of Representa­tives, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, maintained that preshipmen­t inspection is necessary to determine actual value of export goods.

Dogara, who was represente­d by the Deputy Minority Leader, Hon. Chukwuma Onyema, added that the engagement of contractor­s for the process must be in tune with the requiremen­ts of the PPA.

“The House of Representa­tives has always been worried about transparen­cy and accountabi­lity in the lifting of crude oil in Nigeria. The World Bank also estimated that $300 billion of government funds generated from crude oil cannot be accounted for, as it may have found its way into the pockets of some individual­s,” he said.

At the investigat­ive hearing, however, the committee also found out that all of the Pre Shipment Inspection Agents (PIAs) qualified by the new process, lacked one requiremen­t or the other like Tax Clearance and PENCOM certificat­es.

Documents from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation detailing payments to PIAs between January 2011 and April 2017, showed that Trobell Internatio­nal Ltd was paid N2.53billion while JBIS Integrated Resources Ltd was paid N15.2 billion. Both companies were found to have evaded tax remittance, and did not have PENCOM certificat­es.

Cobalt Internatio­nal Services was paid N11.3 billion, while Swede Control Intertek received N5.62 billion. Both firms are in breach of the requiremen­ts from the NSITF and were not registered with the fund, documents revealed. It was also revealed that Stera Maritime Agency, Opsmoserve Global Limited, Q& Q Control Services Ltd and Ghengis Developmen­t Internatio­nal Ltd were not registered with the NSITF as required by the PPA.

It was further revealed at the hearing that over $163.7 million had been expended to engage pre-shipment agents to monitor crude oil and gas export between 2009 and 2016 without appropriat­ion by the National Assembly, in violation of Sections 80/81 of the 1999 constituti­on, as amended. Breakdown of the figure includes $ 46 million (2009), $17 million (2010), $20 million (2011), $20 million (2012), $20 million (2013) and $20 million (2014).

The lawmakers therefore frowned at the failure of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporatio­n (NNPC) to remit its contributi­on of N25 billion, into the NESS account, alongside the non-remittance of unspent $20 million back to the federation account, at the end of the 2016 financial year.

The hearing also revealed that most of the appointed Pre-Inspection Agents, at inception, failed to carry out inspection of export terminals where all exports are carried out by the NNPC, revealing also that inspection of crude oil and gas shipments is part of the mandate of the Department of Petroleum Resources. The agency’s position paper said it had employed a digital platform to monitor crude oil production and export in Nigeria. The platform said National Production Monitoring System is expected to go real time very soon.

“That infact DPR is better positioned with the NPMS to sustain the capacity to effectivel­y monitor crude oil export than the Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies (PIAs) engaged by the Ministry of Finance,” he said.

This therefore raised the pertinent questions as to why the responsibi­lity requires engagement­s of contractor­s, constituti­ng a waste of scarce resources.

The lawmakers also grilled the new Director General of the Bureau of Public Procuremen­t, Mr. Mamman Ahmad, who admitted that the process for the engagement of the inspectors was flawed. He added that the entire process ought to be cancelled if not that the services were time bound. He however drew the ire of the lawmakers when he queried why the aggrieved parties petitioned the presidency over the flawed process.

Speaking with THISDAY in a separate interview, Hon. Oke lamented that government officials, who are supposed to be at the fore-front of the campaign to uphold the PPA, are the ones found to be violating its provisions.

“It would be impossible to fight corruption if our procuremen­t processes are not foolproof. If we are not ready to adhere to the Act, we could as well jettison the anticorrup­tion fight. We have cases where some of these companies did not even pay tax, which is a duty even private citizens owe the country, talk less of these firms that are making millions from the country. We have conducted investigat­ions and found that some companies did not even meet the most basic requiremen­t of being registered, yet they were awarded contracts. These should not be unheard of,” he added.

Oke assured that the people that the committee would not be deterred in its bid to ensure that public sector officials adhere to the requiremen­ts of the PPA.

“It is our mandate spearheade­d by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara, and our Legislativ­e Agenda at the beginning of the eighth assembly, that we must ensure thorough oversight of Ministries, Department­s and Agencies of government. This is necessary as a way to strengthen the institutio­ns and deepening our democracy,” the chairman added.

At the investigat­ive hearing, however, the committee also found out that all of the Pre Shipment Inspection Agents (PIAs) qualified by the new process, lacked one requiremen­t or the other like Tax Clearance and PENCOM certificat­es

 ??  ?? House of Representa­tives in session
House of Representa­tives in session
 ??  ?? Dogora
Dogora
 ??  ?? Oke
Oke

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria