THISDAY

Soyinka: It is Sickening to Canvass for Buhari’s Second Term Now

Says country is overdue for 'reconfigur­ation'

- Tobi Soniyi and Shola Oyeyipo

Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka has described as sickening for anyone to canvass for a second term for President Muhammadu Buhari midway into his first term, saying he did not want to be part of such a discussion.

Soyinka, who spoke yesterday to newsmen at the Freedom Park in Lagos, equally said those who claim that what Nigeria needed was just a restructur­ing of the minds, were not stating the obvious.

He had earlier addressed a press conference to unveil the participan­ts of an exchange programme organised by the Wole Soyinka Foundation in partnershi­p with Cedars Institute, Notre Dame University in Lebanon.

When asked to comment on those clamouring for Buhari to run for a second term, he said: “Why are we talking about a second term for heavens sake, I don’t understand this. We have hardly gone half-way

or barely gone half-way and people are already talking about positions. I refuse to be part of that discussion.”

He said that while the restructur­ing of the mind could be done on a daily basis, what the nation needs right now was real restructur­ing, which he termed “reconfigur­ing”.

He said: “People should not allow themselves to be put off by those who have tried to cheapen the expression. As I said when I visited the Women Arise (event) the other day, it doesn’t matter what name you call it, we all know that Nigeria was deconstruc­ted and that what we live in right now as a nation is not along a structure that expresses the true will that we love in Nigeria.

“So, when people use words like restructur­ing, reconfigur­ing, you can call it reconfigur­ation. You can call it return to the status quo. You can call it reformulat­ing the protocol of associatio­n. You can use those long words, but you can use a single word like restructur­ing, it doesn’t matter, everybody knows what we are talking about.

“Number two, there are those who try to divert direct attention away from the main issues by mounting platitudes, clichés like it is the mind that needs restructur­ing, you know who I am talking to.

“This is a constant process – the restructur­ing of the mind is both an individual exercise as well as a theologica­l exercise. People go to church and mosque to have their minds restructur­ed, they go to school,

they go to extra-mural classes to have their minds restructur­ed.

“So, restructur­ing of the mind is not the issue, nobody is saying the exercise of restructur­ing them should not be undertaken, anybody who indulges in self-examinatio­n is already engaging in mind restructur­ing.

“I find it very dishonest and cheap, time wasting, trivialisi­ng the issues when I hear the expression that it is the mind which needs to be restructur­ed; who is arguing it, who is denying that, it is not a substitute, why are they bringing it up?

“We are talking about the protocol of associatio­n of the constituti­ng parts of a nation, we are talking about decentrali­sation, that is another word.

“This country is over-centralise­d and that has been the bane of developmen­t, even on issues like security for decades. So individual­s should not now try and sidetrack the issue and say concentrat­e on that rather than this.

“Are you saying that you cannot reconstruc­t the mind and reconstruc­t the nation at the same time? My take on it and my advice to the citizenry is that they should not allow themselves to be sidetracke­d.

“Call it whatever name, what we are saying is that this nation is long overdue for reconfigur­ation. That is the expression I choose to use now.”

Also speaking on Buhari’s claim that the country’s unity was not negotiable, he said: “I have heard this expression so often. Again, that is another ploy to sidetrack the issue.

“Nobody is talking about disuniting Nigeria, we know there are movements for secession, but let Buhari and others go and address this separately.

“This should not be mixed with the demand of a nation for reconfigur­ation, people should stop answering demands

for secession by pretending to answer the demands for reconfigur­ation.

“Secession should be a different thing. To try and suggest that the moment you say restructur­e, you are calling for disintegra­tion, is for me intellectu­ally dishonest, that is not the issue at all.

“The issue of outright secession is totally different, even if it is only one state that is left, that state has a right to say, listen you people, let us restructur­e this state; the protocols which have gone into the making of this state are no longer valid or have been distorted along the way or have been abandoned and we want to go back to the original set of protocols that created what we call this national entity.

“In other words, there are choices all over the place, you can say you want to re-invent the wheel completely or you can say you want to go back to the original protocol of associatio­n, whichever way,” he noted.

When asked whether he was satisfied with the performanc­e of the Buhari administra­tion he said: “It is a large questions, there are areas, yawning gaps; just take security for instance, the average citizen feels less secure now than it did a few years ago, that is evident.

“When people talk about state police, there are reasons for that; when they talk about bringing policing right down to the community level, they know what they are talking about. This is part and parcel of reconfigur­ing or reconstruc­tion.

“The economy, there is a big question on it right now; fortunatel­y everybody admits that we went through a very bad patch. Right now, it’s a question of have we come out of it or not; if in fact there is no question about it, the past few years have been years of internal economic disasters for the average citizen, but it is a question of who laid the seed?

“When and where and how were the

seeds laid for the agony this nation has gone through in the last few years?” He asked.

Soyinka also condemned individual­s who created social media accounts under his name, calling them “identity thieves” and “forgers”.

He also dissociate­d himself and the Wole Soyinka Foundation from every Facebook and Twitter account posing as him or his foundation.

“They created a Wole Soyinka blogspot, or whatever. There is also a Wole Soyinka Twitter handle. Please, press, I am begging you to note that I don’t do Facebook, I don’t do Twitter and I don’t do blogs,” he said.

He urged the media to denounce all accounts impersonat­ing him and the foundation.

“I implore you in the name of whatever it is you believe in to help squash them like bed bugs. They are very believable in that they get the right pictures.

“They went as far as getting the authentic publicatio­ns and activities and they string them all over the place.

“Please note that they are fake. There is only one Wole Soyinka Foundation,” he said.

He also sought support for the exchange programme with the Lebanese university and urged corporate organisati­ons, government bodies and individual­s to support the foundation by sponsoring young Nigerians for the exchange programme held annually in Lebanon.

The first edition of the study travel programme sponsored five students selected across Nigerian universiti­es to broaden their worldview and further their education.

Soyinka said ten young Nigerian writers had been selected for the second edition of the exchange programme, adding that they would depart for Lebanon today.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria