THISDAY

Do You Know Your Fatal Flaw?

- Marie-Therese Phido Marie- Therese Phido is Sales & Market Strategist and Business Coach Email: mphido@elevato.com. ng tweeter handle @ osat2012 TeL: 0809015815­6 ( text only)

You are not alone if you do not know your fatal flaw. Over two thirds of leaders do not recognise this deficiency because it takes a while for the direct correlatio­n of our flaw to start showing. It is important to start evaluating yourself early in your growth trajectory, to determine where your errors of omission and commission are and start to actively work on correcting them

Let’s start by attempting to define what a fatal flaw is. “Fatal flaws are weaknesses that are extreme and can have a dramatic, negative effect on a leader, seriously hampering their contributi­on to the organizati­on and their career progress. Everyone else can see this clearly; but the person with the fatal flaw almost never does.” Data shows that someone perceived very poorly on any single, important leadership trait pays a high price. If their score is in the bottom 10 percent on one skill, they will rank in the bottom fifth overall – no matter how strong other strengths are. “Bottomline, leaders don’t need to be extremely good at everything, but they generally cannot be totally void in one area and still succeed.” Data also says, most of the fatal flaws noticed as “sins of omission” from leaders have been in the areas of a lack of strategic thinking, not taking responsibi­lity for outcomes, not building strong relationsh­ips, or “sins of commission”, having a terrible temper, an executive who lies, arrogance, lack of empathy, etc. When I read this literature to support this article it got me thinking. You and I know many leaders who have at least 2-3 sins of omission and as well as sins of commission rising to the top of their career. My conclusion is that, it was pure luck. Each leader I know with these weaknesses, now I’m talking about the CEO level, had these leadership positions fall on them because of extenuatin­g circumstan­ces in the organizati­ons they led. Had the situation been normal, where there was competitio­n or a vote to attain these position, many of them would not have achieved this feat in the careers. Haven cleared that exception, let’s look at normal people like you and me and leaders who have had to go through an evaluation system to achieve the next level of growth in their careers. Let me start with me. Like I have mentioned on this page before in my article “It takes more than hardwork. Politics is Key!” I thought it was all about getting the work done, being innovative, pushing myself and my team to excel. At the lower rung of my career, this objective worked very well for me and was appreciate­d by the organizati­on I worked in. As I grew up the ladder, I started to suffer from a fatal sin of omission, which was very hard for me to see. The main reason was, though the organizati­on was a meritocrac­y, I thought that was all that mattered. Doing a good job! It was not immediatel­y visible to me that I was suffering from a fatal sin of omission of “not building strong relationsh­ips”. It took me a while to realize that there was more at play than just the work, it was more about your alignments, who was with whom, were you perceived as loyal or subordinat­e enough, etc. Your work still spoke for you, but there was more that was required. Let me also say that merit was still highly prized and rewarded, and was not detrimenta­l to my growth. I also had a colleague, who did excellent work, but her sin of omission was also a lack of “not building strong relationsh­ips”. She was quiet and reserved, but everybody felt the job she was performing required a more extroverte­d personalit­y. Being her direct supervisor, I disagreed with this assertion, because I found her very effective on her job and knew that everybody could not have the same personalit­y. She could never understand this requiremen­t, and it was detrimenta­l to her growth. I have had bosses, whose sins of omission, I felt were a lack of strategic thinking. They were also good at getting the work done, but lacked the strategic thinking of ensuring that innovation and “new thinking” for the future was woven into their work. We all also know leaders who lack empathy or jokingly degrade the people they interact with or work with. Greatest sin in my view is the leader that lies. Thank God in my over 20 years as a profession­al, I came across very few and one in particular with a penchant to lie. Research has shown that many of us are not aware of our flaws. Jack Zenger, the author of “Most Leaders Know Their Strengths – but Are Oblivious to Their Weaknesses”, said becoming more self-aware is where to start. He says there are several ways to can learn to identify your weaknesses, and start to figure out whether they are serious or mild. Start by finding a “truth teller”, who will share honest feedback with you. He says data shows and from my own personal experience that our colleagues know about or see firsthand failing in us. We just need to find these people and encourage them to give us feedback. If that doesn’t work, hire an external consultant to give you feedback. I know of a colleague who did this. I know because I was one of those who provided feedback to the outside consultant. I was very proud of her for going the extra mile to be self- aware. You are not alone if you do not know your fatal flaw. Over two thirds of leaders do not recognize this deficiency because it takes a while for the direct correlatio­n of our flaw to start showing. It is important to start evaluating yourself early in your growth trajectory, to determine where your errors of omission and commission are and start to actively work on correcting them. Good luck!

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria