Buhari Never Directed Fuel Subsidy Removal, Says Lawan
Doubts 100m litres PMS daily consumption TUC supports elimination of petrol subsidy
The Senate President yesterday said President Muhammadu Buhari had not directed anyone in his government to implement the removal of petroleum subsidy.
Lawan, who spoke with newsmen yesterday after a closed-door meeting with Buhari at the State House, Abuja, said he was in the villa to convey the feeling of his constituents on the planned fuel subsidy removal and other issues to the president.
However, the Trade Union Congress (TUC) yesterday expressed support for the federal government's plan to end fuel subsidy payments in the country.
Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Mrs. Zainab Ahmed, had announced last October that the federal government made provision for petrol subsidy only for the first six months of 2022, as the government looked towards complete deregulation of the sector.
"In our 2022 budget, we only factored in subsidy for the first half of the year; the second half of the year, we are looking at complete deregulation of the sector, saving foreign exchange and potentially earning more from the oil and gas industry,” Ahmed had said.
But commenting on the issue, Lawan said the federal legislators were worried about the different agitation and planned protests around the country, necessitating the discussion with the president.
According to him, the subsidy cannot be transferred to citizens even as he expressed doubts on the 100 million liters of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) said to be consumed per day in the country.
The Senate President said he was glad to inform Nigerians that Buhari had not told anyone to remove petroleum subsidy.
He said: “Well, it will be of interest to Nigerians to hear what I've come to discuss with Mr. President among several other things. Many of us are very concerned with the recent agitations, protests, and many citizens were so concerned, our constituents across the country are very concerned that the federal government will remove the petroleum subsidy.
“And for us, as parliamentarians, as legislators representing the people of Nigeria, this must be of interest to us. And we've just finished our recess, we had gone home to our constituencies and senatorial districts.
“And will felt the pulse of our people. And I found it necessary to visit Mr. President, as the the leader of our government and our leader in the country, to discuss this particular issue of concern to Nigerians, and I'm happy to inform Nigerians that Mr. President never told anyone that the petroleum subsidy should be removed.
“I know and I agree that the subsidy is very heavy. But I think we must never transfer the burden to the citizens.
“I believe that we need to look at the quoted figure of maybe 100 million litres that people claim we’re consuming. Is it real? I mean is it either under recoveries of subsidy? Is it really 100 million liters per day? How on earth are we consuming that?
“We need to look at this critically and see how we can find the truth. Because I am not convinced that within the boundaries of Nigeria we are consuming 100 million liters. Probably neighboring countries maybe benefiting from this. Can’t we do something about it?
“It is a failure on us if we are not able to control it, this particular aspect of smuggling of the petrol and then in return, push the burden to the ordinary citizen.”
On what will happen since the 2022 budget does not provide for subsidy, he answered: “No, I'm not going to speculate on that. But I'm telling you, what I know, from my discussions with Mr. President, and I don't want to go beyond that kind of understanding.
“He didn't tell anybody that we should remove petroleum subsidy. And those of us who represent the people know how people are already stressed over and again, this is going to kill everyone if people don't say we know is going to be too much for them.
“So, I just want to commend Mr. President, that he didn't order anybody, to say that petroleum subsidy will be removed, even though we know it's burden. So it’s now our task, as an administration, we must find a solution. Let's go and lock ourselves somewhere".
He commended the President for what he said was keeping his philosophy of not to over burdening ordinary citizens as he observed that government law is meant to serve the people.
“Government is meant to serve people. And the essence of government law we all know is to protect the lives and property and welfare of the people. And that federal aspect is part of the welfare.
“It may not be exactly the way we want it in the implementation of subsidy. But that is our challenge as an administration as a government.
“So, we need to come together, both the legislature, the National Assembly, and those people and institutions and organizations that are responsible in dealing with this matter. To find a solution to this.”
Lawan, however emphasised the need for stakeholders to come together to find solution to the issue of subsidy.
While dismissing the position of the governors of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on subsidy removal, Lawan stressed that the main opposition party had its chance and ought to have done something about it.
According to him: “They had their time. They should have done something about it. Now we have to do something about it. I have admitted that the burden is heavy. But I don't think that the ordinary citizen should be the one to bear the burden.”
Speaking earlier during plenary on the 2022 budget, the Senate President noted with regret that borrowings remained the only optional left for the country to fund the spending plan due to poor revenue being generated by the nation, at the moment.
He, however, said efforts would be intensified by the Senate to carry out aggressive oversight activities that would make the revenue generating agencies to be more alive to their responsibilities.
Lawan said, "Funding of the 2022 budget is predicated on significant borrowing. Our country is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.”
TUC Backs Fuel Subsidy Removal
Meanwhile, the National President