NIGERIA: A THEATRE OF CONTRADICTIONS

ABDULKABIR MUHAMMED contends that many of our actions are the opposite of what we preach

I resorted to this title amidst contradictions. I had thought of entitling it, ‘Nigeria: Of a facade country and peoples’ or ‘Nigeria: Who is deceiving who?’ This was because Nigeria makes one wonders if there is anything real. The country with the largest black race survives on a platter of facade and contradictions.

This cuts across all strata. From local government to state and national levels, the leaders and the led operate on deceits. The academic environment is not spared from the issue. Religious organisations, especially, contradict what they stood for. This raises a lot of questions in the mind of an average Nigerian as to why a system would choose to be extraordinarily deceitful. What consequences, if any, would such a system have begotten afterwards?

First off, our conception of Nigeria is yet to be clarified. Our motto, ‘Unity and Faith, Peace and Progress’, is an utter contradiction. We live in ‘one Nigeria’ where an indispensable part of the country has continued to nurture seeds of bitterness and revenge.

The third major ethnic group in Nigeria, the Igbo people of eastern Nigeria, has continued to agitate for a State of Biafra, in the past five decades. We pretended as if all was right; as if the sit-at-home syndrome in some part of eastern Nigeria, especially in Enugu, and the lack of tolerance for people of other tribes to hold certain positions were child’s play.

We also pretended not to have perceived the whole issues that transpired in the 2023 Lagos gubernatorial elections—the ‘No Man’s Land’ saga and the constitutional right deprivation meted out on people of other ethnic group—as a dividend from the seed of discord planted in the country by some kleptocrats and egoists. Yet, the same country tags itself a federal state when the subordinates are extremely weaker than the central; where the federal government controls 70 percent of states’ resources and budget. We always tend to be more catholic than the pope. This issue has been protractedly contested by states- especially those who felt that their resources are being used to service other poor states- but the resolutions were not satisfactory. This is largely responsible for thefts and the recurring violence, especially, in the Niger Delta region. Still, we don’t want to look in that direction.

Democracy is what Nigeria practices and preaches, but our situation is, no different from a monarchical system where power resides in the hand of the blue-blooded. Perhaps the only feature of democracy that we manifest, since the transition into the fourth republic, is the periodic elections—which were always marred with violence and false results.

Seconding that is public opinion/expression. Nigerians would not concede such rights to the government. The mantra, ‘democracy brings about development’ is only a classroom debate, in Nigeria’s case. Even though Section 14 sub section 2 (b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended states that ‘the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government’, the reality is that the Nigerian government is concerned with the welfare of the plutocrats.

The Nigerian democratic system renders Abraham Lincoln’s definition of democracy (as a government of the people by the people and for the people), as being limited. Democracy, in the Nigerian example, is a government of the few, by the masses, and for the aristocrats. Moreover, the security of the people is a question of ‘don’t lose guard.’ Boko Haram has kept on ravaging the land, largely, since 2009 but the Nigerian government has not been able to nip it in the bud, despite successive budgets on security. I feel dishonest telling my students the Borno State was supposed to be Nigeria’s ‘Home of Peace.’ These, notwithstanding, Nigerian leaders harp on the need to improve production and consumption of local products.

In a state where farmers have no access to capital and up-to-date implements? Where those who struggle to farm could not work on their farms because of some Fulani herdsmen? Disgracefully, this was reiterated by President Muhammadu Buhari, in whose regime the farmers suffered humiliating herdsmen/cattle menace. Of what use, therefore, is our fertile soil?

The Law is supreme above the ruler and the ruled, a concept I was fed with as a high school student, appears to me a contradiction. A facade! The Nigerian rule of law only applies to the poor citizens; the peasants at the lowest hierarchy. You wonder what was supposed of the likes of ‘Senator’ Ahmed Lawan, as one in a million? Nigerian politicians are so powerful, not only above the law, but also, law agents and caretakers. They manipulate them to meet their ends.

What is more, an administration that claimed it understands and shares from the citizens’ outcry, enacted a policy that have left the masses in economic hardship; one that forces its subjects into illegitimate and unrecommended fasting; a policy that has led a lot of parents to withdrawing their children from school, thereby increasing pilfering and arm robbery. The subsidy removal and the reverberations, therewith, has reduced the hardworking Nigerians to irresponsible citizens; a policy that has left Nigerians in an enduring harsh mood. Indifferently, however, it expended billions of Naira buying yachts and vehicles for senators. Alarmingly, such a government went ahead appointing ministers who would misappropriate public funds. This would come from the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation! Another contradiction!

Another contradiction relates to Nigeria’s eulogy as one of the most religious countries in the world. Our Alfas, pastors, sheikhs, reverends, prophets and evangelists are uncountable. Our traditional worshipers and priests are as many as the deities. Yet, no sign of religiosity reflects in our political economy. The same alfa who preaches taqwa (the fear of God) is the Baba Isale of overambitious politicians who want to meet their ends though whatever possible means. He is the one who helps the Yahoo boys do the miracles: he helps them in avenging ‘the past colonial exploitations of their great grandfathers’ resources.’

I had heard people say that philosophers do not believe in God, until I attended a philosophy class where a lecturer bluntly refuted such a claim. For her, philosophers do believe in God but only ask philosophical questions. They interrogate the existence of a supreme being; the unseen. They question the evolution of human beings. They are also not satisfied (theoretically as it appears) with the claim of predestination (Determinism) as they find it difficult to reconcile between it and free will. They cannot imagine how somebody can deserve either paradise or hell fire for their deeds. Is it not then contradictory seeing that some of these philosophers attend mosques and churches where everything is believed to be in the hand of God Almighty? Doesn’t it mean that their students are being deceived?