Trying my best, says Jaitley as GST logjam continues
DEADLINE:
NEW DELHI: Finding no common ground on the issue of dual control or cross empowerment that deals with assessee jurisdiction, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council’s 7th meeting that came to an end on Friday raised grave concerns about its April 1 implementation date while Finance Minister Arun Jaitley saying that he was trying his best.
“I am trying my best (on deadline of April 1). I don’t want to hasten the process of discussion and don’t want to delay the implementation,” Jaitley said at a press briefing after the Council meet ended.
The Finance Minister, however, said: “There was no issue raised on dual control today as we were working on legislations.”
Jaitley said that the two principle issues that still remain before the Council are Integrated GST (iGST) and cross empowerment.
“In iGST, definition of territory of states is pending. And the division of authority between assessing authorities of Centre and states is pending. The two issues will be taken up together at the next meeting on January 3-4.
“The recommendation of GST rates committee will also be placed before the Council at the next meeting,” he said.
The drafts of Central GST (cGST) and the compensation law were approved mostly in the Council meeting on Friday with the only portions relating to dual control being left out, he added.
“The primary draft of the cGST and sGST law has been approved. These two laws will be mirror image of each other. There were some portions that were left out. Only those blanks are there which deal with dual control and cross empowerment,” Jaitley said.
The legally vetted copy of the cGST and compensation law will brought before the Council in its next meeting, he said.
The three GST bills — Central GST (cGST), Integrated GST and State Compensation Law — need to be approved by the Council before they can be tabled in the Parliament.
West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra, who is part of the GST Council, told reporters that the “big issues are still to be resolved”.
The iGST issue has discussed on Friday, he said.
“Second issue is dual control. The not been states are very clear with the unanimous decision of the empowered committee that small traders with a turnover of Rs 1.5 crore turnover cannot have dual assessment,” he added.
Mitra said that post-demonetisation, the states feel that they will need more compensation than mentioned in the GST draft bills.
“Many issues on compensation need to be resolved. Earlier the parameters on compensation were different, there was no demonetisaion. Now in new environment, many states feel they will need compensation. They feel 30-40 per cent revenue will be affected in the third quarter.”
But Jaitley, during the press briefing, clarified that the compensation in GST is only for loss of revenues due to GST implementation, but asked how was related to this.
Meanwhile, against the backdrop of the ongoing Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council meet, industry lobby Assocham has asked for removal of the anti-profiteering provision from the model law.
“Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India has suggested removal of a provision in the revised Model GST Law dealing with antiprofiteering since it is open to misuse and subjective interpretation,” Assocham said in a statement here on Friday.
The suggestion was made by the industry chambers in a detailed representation to the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CEBC) and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. it