UK papers try to guess Prince Harry and Meghan’s mystery matchmaker
LONDON: Britain’s newspapers were rife with speculation on Wednesday about the mystery matchmaker of Queen Elizabeth’s grandson Prince Harry and his fiancee American actress Meghan Markle who met on a blind date in London last year.
In a televised interview on Monday when they announced their engagement, the couple were coy about the identity of the “mutual friend” who had brought them together.
“We should protect her privacy and not reveal too much of that,” said Markle, with Harry adding: “We’ll protect her privacy yeah. But it was — it was literally — it was through her.”
On its front page, the Times newspaper declared that it was the fashion designer Misha Nonoo, who was born in Bahrain and raised in London. The paper said her estranged husband is Alexander Gilkes, who went to the same exclusive school, Eton College, that Harry, 33, attended, while she is also a close friend of Markle and went on holiday with her in the summer of 2016.
However, the Daily Telegraph had a different solution. It said Violet Von Westenholz, who had been friends with Harry since he was a teenager, was behind the romance. Westenholz, a PR director for fashion label Ralph Lauren, had helped organise a publicity day for “Suits” in London in June last year, the US TV legal drama in which Markle was one of the cast’s stars. Harry and Markle, 36, began dating the following month. “I might leave that for other people say (who the matchmaker was),” to she told the Telegraph. “It’s a great love story and I am sure they are going to be very happy together.”
The couple announced on Tuesday they would wed in March next year at St George’s Chapel in the grounds of Windsor Castle, which has been the family home of British kings and queens for almost 1,000 years.
While the couple’s nuptials have dominated the news in Britain, a poll suggested more than a half of Britons were fairly non-plussed.
A YouGov survey for the Times found 39 per cent were pleased by the engagement, four per cent disappointed and 52 per cent indifferent.