Oman Daily Observer

WHAT IS MEAT?

-

Can a hamburger or steak be labelled ‘meat’ if it is plant-based? That question has sparked a debate about US food labels as key US cattle industry players have sought to crack down on marketing of proteins made from soy and other plant-based substances. Jessica Almy, Policy Director of the nonprofit Good Food Institute, which promotes meat-alternativ­es, said labels must state clearly if a product is made from soy or another plant, but they usually make sense in context.

“Regardless of whether it is made of beef, soy or wheat, a burger tells you it can be cooked on a grill, placed on a bun, and served with mustard and ketchup,” she said.

Almy also sees no alternativ­e to labelling as ‘meat’ new products made from animal cells grown in a lab.

Such protein offerings are expected to hit US supermarke­ts and specialty shops within the next few years.

“These are muscles and fat. It would be extremely misleading to call it other than meat,” said Almy said.

That stance has enraged some in the traditiona­l meat industry, spurring the US Cattlemen’s Associatio­n to file a petition to the Agricultur­e Department to reserving the term ‘meat’ or ‘beef’ to protein derived from slaughtere­d animals.

“Labels indicating that a product is ‘beef’ should be limited to product from cattle that have been born, raised and harvested in the traditiona­l manner,” the petition said.

The cattle associatio­n, which represents ranchers and cattle breeders, said it wants to avoid a similar outcome to the dairy industry, which has seen alternativ­e products made of soy, almond and other non-dairy sources take 10 per cent of the ‘milk’ market.

“We started seeing these products put into the meat shelves in the grocery stores with packaging, label and design misleading the consumers into believing that perhaps it is a healthier version of the traditiona­l meat or perhaps this is real beef,” said USCA spokeswoma­n Lia Biondo.

“We are trying to preempt the issue, to prevent what the dairy industry is going through.” animal cells, further complicati­ng the picture.

While the USCA petition has won some support, not all in the food industry have signed on.

The Farm Bureau generally supports the idea behind the petition, but does not want oversight of alternativ­e proteins to shift outside of the Agricultur­e Department.

“If it is not called meat, what is it then? We want to retain the jurisdicti­on under the Secretary of Agricultur­e,” said Dale Moore, who is in-charge of public affairs for the Farm Bureau.

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Associatio­n, which counts among its members meat distributo­rs and processors, has not signed the petition either.

Chris Kerr, Investment Manager at New Crop Capital, a venture capital firm investing in alternativ­e food companies, said efforts like the USCA petition illustrate a head-inthe-sand approach to shifting tastes.

“We are looking at a major behavioura­l shift by a whole segment of the consumer population, driven a lot by the millennial­s.

They are very open to plant-based food, to being flexitaria­n,” he said.

“The industry can fight this, but they are arguably fighting against themselves because ultimately most meat producers will have some stake in this and it will be a successful outcome,” he added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Oman