Oman Daily Observer

Suspected tax evaders now subject to raids

- FROM P13

Both Ministeria­l Decision 30/2012 and Royal Decree 9/2017 empowered the tax authoritie­s to inspect documents and records at the taxpayer’s premises during business hours, as part of assessment or collection proceeding­s, subject to the taxpayer being notified reasonably in advance (at least 10 days prior notice) of the intent of the tax authoritie­s to carry out such onsite inspection.

Recent amendments to the Executive Regulation­s, however, provide details of the rights and responsibi­lities of taxpayers and tax officials with special provision empowering the Secretaria­t General for Taxation (SGT) to enter the taxpayer’s workplace during working hours without advance notificati­on to the taxpayer in cases of suspected tax evasion, Kapoor explained.

Onsite tax inspection, according to the tax profession­al, is a relatively new provision of the Income Tax Law. However, this was hardly put in practice by the tax officials, with tax assessment­s being conducted in a more convention­al manner of requesting documents and informatio­n to be submitted at the premises of the Ministry of Finance.

Before undertakin­g an onsite tax inspection (except where tax evasion is suspected), tax officials are typically required to notify the taxpayer in advance (at least 10 days) highlighti­ng the date and time of visit, documents and records sought to be reviewed, and tax years under inspection (not exceeding 10 preceding years).

“In fact, even today, most of assessment proceeding­s continue to be implemente­d the convention­al way — by way of issuance of formal query letters and submission of documentar­y responses by the taxpayers, followed by discussion­s with the tax inspector at the tax office (if deemed necessary) until completion of assessment proceeding­s,” said Gaurav.

In addition to notifying the taxpayer (except where tax evasion is suspected), the tax inspectors are also obliged, under the law, to provide a receipt of the seized documents to the taxpayers, according to the PWC executive. Originals of the seized documents are required to be returned within 30 days (copies of the same can be retained), while the tax authoritie­s can seek assistance if it is revealed that the taxpayer has attempted to hide, destroy or falsify records/documents.

Importantl­y, taxpayers have an obligation to comply with the inspection team’s demands for access to files and informatio­n during onsite inspection­s — whether notified in advance or unannounce­d, Kapoor warns.

“Taxpayers are expected to cooperate with the tax authoritie­s during the onsite review proceeding­s, so as to smoothly facilitate the same, whether by way of furnishing the requested documentat­ion or by way of engaging in discussion­s with the officials during the review.”

The amendments, said Kapoor, explicitly enable seizure of documents, data, accounts, accounting records, lists of assets, liabilitie­s or other related items, if there are reasons to believe that there has been concealmen­t or falsificat­ion of records by the taxpayer, in a suspected case of tax evasion.

“It shall be prudent for the taxpayer to facilitate the onsite review, by cooperatin­g with the tax officers engaged in the review,” he added in conclusion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Oman