Times of Oman

US aid to Pakistan shrinks amid mounting frustratio­n over militants

-

WASHINGTON: Pakistan’s continued support for resurgent militant groups hostile to the United States, coupled with warming US military and business relations with India, is sharply diminishin­g Islamabad’s strategic importance as an ally to Washington, US military, diplomatic, and intelligen­ce officials and outside experts said.

The United States has cut both military and economic aid to Pakistan sharply in recent years, reflecting mounting frustratio­n among a growing number of officials with the nuclear-armed country’s support for the Taliban in neighbouri­ng Afghanista­n.

That frustratio­n has dogged US-Pakistan ties for more than a decade, but has spiked anew as the militant group has advanced in parts of Afghanista­n that US and allied forces once helped to secure, US officials and analysts say.

“We’re seeing a very definitive and very sharp reorientin­g of US policy in South Asia away from Afghanista­n-Pakistan and more towards India,” said Michael Kugelman, a South Asia expert with the Woodrow Wilson Centre, a Washington think-tank.

The US relationsh­ip with Pakistan has long been a transactio­nal one marked by mutual mistrust, marriages of convenienc­e, and mood swings.

The long-standing US frustratio­n with Pakistan’s refusal to stop supporting the Taliban, especially within the US military and intelligen­ce community, is now overriding President Barack Obama’s administra­tion’s desire to avoid renewed military involvemen­t in Afghanista­n, as well as concerns that China could capitalize on fraying ties between Washington and Islamabad, the US officials said.

Obama announced last month he would keep US troop levels in Afghanista­n at 8,400 through the end of his administra­tion, shelving plans to cut the force in half by year end. American civilian and military aid to Pakistan, once the third-largest recipient of US foreign assistance, is expected to total less than $1 billion in 2016, down from a recent peak of more than $3.5 billion in 2011, according to US government data.

Budget constraint­s

The United States has not appropriat­ed less than $1 billion to Pakistan since at least 2007. The decrease also comes amid budget constraint­s and shifting global priorities for the United States, including fighting IS militants, a re- surgent Russia and an increasing­ly assertive China.

In March, Republican Senator Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he would seek to bar $430 million in US funding for Islamabad’s purchase of $700 million of Lockheed Martin Corp. F-16 fighter jets.

Earlier this month, Secretary of Defence Ash Carter refused to authorize $300 million in military reimbursem­ents to Pakistan, citing the limited gains the country has made fighting the militant Haqqani network, which is based in the country’s tribal areas bordering Afghanista­n.

The approval of such funding has been mostly routine in the past. The US Congress has yet to authorize hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to Pakistan for the next fiscal year. The Pentagon is due to authorize $350 million in military aid for the next fiscal year, and is unlikely to approve it under the Obama administra­tion, a US defence official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

“Congress is no longer willing to fund a state that supports the Afghan Taliban, which is killing American soldiers,” said Bruce Riedel, a Brookings Institutio­n expert and former CIA officer who headed Obama’s first Afghanista­n policy review.

In a stark illustrati­on of the limits of US-Pakistan cooperatio­n, the United States killed Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour in a drone strike in Pakistan’s remote Balochista­n region in May, without informing Pakistan. Some US officials still warn of the dangers of allowing relations with Pakistan to deteriorat­e. In a July 26 opinion piece in the

Senator John McCain, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, argued that “the strategic imperative for improved relations between the US and Pakistan is clear - for the safety of American troops and the success of their mission in Afghanista­n, for the stability of the region and for the national security of both Pakistan and the US.

“A senior Pakistani defence official said the United States will continue to need Pakistan in the fight against terrorism. Authoritie­s in Islamabad have long rejected accusation­s that Pakistan has provided support and sanctuary to militants operating in Afghanista­n. “We have lost over a hundred billion dollars in fighting terrorism, which is more than anything they have given us,” said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

In any event, the official said, Pakistan can turn to other sources of aid, including China. Last year the two countries launched a plan for energy and infrastruc­ture projects in Pakistan worth $46 billion.

Neverthele­ss, the US tilt toward India, is likely to continue.US defence companies including Lockheed Martin and Boeing Co. are entering the Indian market, and the country has become the world’s second-largest arms buyer after Saudi Arabia, according to data compiled by the Stockholm Internatio­nal Peace Research Institute.

 ?? - AFP file photo ?? FOREIGN ASSISTANCE: Pakistani fighters F-16 fly on November 4, 2013 during in the Azm-e-Nau-4” (New Resolve) military exercise in Khairpure Tamay Wali in Bahawalpur distirict. American civilian and military aid to Pakistan, once the third-largest...
- AFP file photo FOREIGN ASSISTANCE: Pakistani fighters F-16 fly on November 4, 2013 during in the Azm-e-Nau-4” (New Resolve) military exercise in Khairpure Tamay Wali in Bahawalpur distirict. American civilian and military aid to Pakistan, once the third-largest...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Oman