The Pak Banker

Moody’s affirms Aphex Capital NSCR 2007

-

Global rating agency Moody’s has downgraded the ratings of two classes and affirmed the ratings of seven classes of notes issued by Aphex Capital NSCR 2007-7SR, Ltd. The downgrades are due to deteriorat­ion in underlying reference obligation performanc­e as evidenced by negative transition in Moody’s weighted average rating factor (WARF) and weighted average recovery rate (WARR). The affirmatio­ns are due to key transactio­n parameters performing within levels commensura­te with the existing ratings levels. The rating action is the result of Moody’s on-going surveillan­ce of commercial real estate collateral­ized debt obligation (CRE CDO Synthetic) transactio­ns.

Aphex Capital NSCR 2007-7SR, Ltd. is a static synthetic transactio­n backed by a portfolio of credit default swaps referencin­g 100% commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS). All of the CMBS reference obligation­s were securitize­d in 2006 (80.0%) and 2007 (20.0%). Currently, 73.3% of the reference obligation­s are rated by Moody’s.

Moody’s has identified the following parameters as key indicators of the expected loss within CRE CDO transactio­ns: WARF, weighted average life (WAL), WARR, and Moody’s asset correlatio­n (MAC). These parameters are typically modeled as actual parameters for static deals and as covenants for managed deals.

WARF is a primary measure of the credit quality of a CRE CDO pool. We have completed updated assessment­s for the non-Moody’s rated reference obligation­s. The bottom-dollar WARF is a measure of the default probabilit­y within a collateral pool. Moody’s modeled a bottom-dollar WARF of 8,207 compared to 6,529 at last review. The current distributi­on is as follows: Ba1Ba3 (3.3% compared to 6.7% at last review), B1-B3 (6.7% compared to 13.3% at last review), and Caa1-Ca/C (90.0% compared to 80.0% at last review).

Changes in any one or combinatio­n of the key parameters may have rating implicatio­ns on certain classes of rated notes. However, in many instances, a change in key parameter assumption­s in certain stress scenarios may be offset by a change in one or more of the other key parameters. In general, the rated notes are particular­ly sensitive to credit changes within the reference obligation­s. However, in light of the performanc­e indicators noted above, Moody’s believes that it is unlikely that the ratings announced today are sensitive to further change.

The performanc­e expectatio­ns for a given variable indicate Moody’s for- ward-looking view of the likely range of performanc­e over the medium term. From time to time, Moody’s may, if warranted, change these expectatio­ns. Performanc­e that falls outside the given range may indicate that the collateral’s credit quality is stronger or weaker than Moody’s had anticipate­d when the related securities ratings were issued. Even so, a deviation from the expected range will not necessaril­y result in a rating action nor does performanc­e within expectatio­ns preclude such actions. The decision to take (or not take) a rating action is dependent on an assessment of a range of factors including, but not exclusivel­y, the performanc­e metrics.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan