The Pak Banker

'diplomacy' is a cynical farce

- Vijay Prashad

No one, neither the Europeans nor Russia and China nor indeed many of the Gulf Arab states, wants an escalation of what is a nascent war against Iran. They know that if the US mounts an enormous assault on Iran, the war will widen from Lebanon to Afghanista­n. No rational person would support this.

President Rouhani made it clear to the United States that he could not understand who, other than his Foreign Minister, could be expected to speak for his country on internatio­nal matters. Part of Iran's goal here is to maintain its sovereignt­y and dignity, and to select a new foreign minister would mean that Iran had buckled under US pressure. This is not going to happen. The Iranians are not going to replace Zarif.

But the Zarif issue is actually a red herring. Even before the sanctions on him personally, the United States showed no appetite for diplomacy. Iran spent several years negotiatin­g with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, as well as with Germany and the European Union, to produce the JCPOA, which was then ratified by the United Nations in 2015. After the US withdrew from the deal, Iran continued to indicate its desire for a diplomatic solution while Washington refused to come to the table.

The problem facing any negotiatio­ns is that the US position is untenable. The US wants to prevent Iran from exercising its right under the nuclear Non-Proliferat­ion Treaty (1968) to enrich uranium even to low levels (4.5 %, which is far from the 90% enrichment needed for a nuclear weapon). It is this impossible position by Washington that stands in the way of a diplomatic solution. Until Washington accepts Iran's right under internatio­nal law to enrich uranium for energy-generating purposes, there will be no permanent deal.

The Europeans indicated quickly that they were unhappy with the sanctions on Zarif. Carlos Martin Ruíz de Gordejuela, a spokesman for the European Union's foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini, said that they regretted the decision. The Europeans say that they will continue to work with Zarif to maintain open diplomatic channels.

Europe's tolerance toward Trump's shenanigan­s is being stretched, albeit to nowhere near its limits. The European Union, despite noises about its practical need for Iranian oil, has been unwilling to mobilize any political opinion on behalf of either the ailing JCPOA or against the wide unilateral US sanctions now on Iran.

Zarif has been working hard to build various coalitions around the world to prevent the United States from controllin­g the narrative. At the recently concluded Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) ministeria­l meeting in Caracas, Zarif held center stage. NAM, whose 120 member countries make it the largest political bloc inside the United Nations, has long opposed American unilateral­ism. In Caracas, they welcomed Zarif's declaratio­n that unilateral sanctions by the US against Iran and Venezuela are a form of "economic terrorism."

 ??  ?? President Hassan Rouhani said that the "White House is frightened by his diplomatic capabiliti­es." Majid Takht Ravanchi, Iran's permanent representa­tive to the United Nations, told Iranian media that the US has sanctioned Zarif in order to "suppress his logic and his
eloquent and persuasive language.
President Hassan Rouhani said that the "White House is frightened by his diplomatic capabiliti­es." Majid Takht Ravanchi, Iran's permanent representa­tive to the United Nations, told Iranian media that the US has sanctioned Zarif in order to "suppress his logic and his eloquent and persuasive language.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan