UK recognition overdue for fallen Arab soldiers
Artificial poppies are blossoming all across the UK as the nation prepares to remember the dead of two world wars. The wearing of the poppy is the prelude to Remembrance Day, the day in 1918 that the guns fell silent in France at the end of the First World War, at the 11th hour on the 11th day of the 11th month.
Traditionally, the commemorative flower is made from red paper and green plastic. This year, however, the Royal British Legion, the charity that distributes the poppies, is offering Britons another way to commemorate the carnage of two world wars - an enamel "Remember Together" lapel pin, designed to commemorate the soldiers of the 53 Commonwealth nations who lost their lives fighting for Britain and Empire.
Better late than never, of course, although the slogan of the Legion's media campaign - "The Unrecognized Heroes of the Past; Remember Them Today" - does rather beg the question: Why haven't the dead of wars fought between 74 and 105 years ago been recognized before now?
In the two wars, more than 160,000 Indians lost their lives, which is far more than the more widely known loss of the 102,843 Australian and 110,363 Canadian troops who fell alongside the 1.2 million British dead. The photograph accompanying the campaign, drawn from the archives of the Imperial War Museum in London, shows a grateful British soldier shaking the hand of an Indian tank commander, Jemader Karnail Singh of the 7th Cavalry, after the decisive defeat of the Japanese at the Battle of Imphal-Kohima in 1944.
Some 828 mainly Muslim soldiers are buried at Imphal Indian Army War Cemetery in Manipur state, and the nearby Imphal Cremation Memorial commemorates 868 Hindus and Sikhs whose remains were cremated in accordance with their faiths. A further 1,603 dead, mainly British but including more than 200 Indians, are buried in nearby Imphal War Cemetery.
Conspicuously absent from this latest Remembrance Day campaign are the Arab soldiers from the western Arabian Peninsula known as the Hejaz, who took up arms against their Ottoman overlords at the behest of the British in 1916
It is, of course, right that the Indian sacrifice in both wars should be remembered. But conspicuously absent from this latest Remembrance Day campaign are the Arab soldiers from the western Arabian Peninsula known as the Hejaz, who took up arms against their Ottoman overlords at the behest of the British in 1916.
Tucked away
in
the
collection
of
the
Imperial War Museum is a simple square of cloth, the color of dried blood. It is labeled "Bedouin kefiyah (headcloth) worn by an Arab tribesman who fought against the Turks during the Arab Revolt 1916-18." There is no record of its owner, or of what became of him. But then, the museum's coverage of Britain's adventures in Arabia is dominated by only one name - the same name that dominates the British perspective on the events of a century ago that shaped the modern Middle East. All the artifacts in the museum relating to the Arab uprising are curated in a single collection with the title "T E Lawrence and the Arab Revolt."
The role of "Lawrence of Arabia" in the defeat of the Ottoman forces in the Hejaz has, as most modern scholars agree - and as Lawrence himself insisted in his memoir, Seven Pillars of Wisdom - been exaggerated. Lawrence, who was only one of several liaison officers between British headquarters in Cairo and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, the Hashemite Arab leader in the Hejaz, later came to regret his role in deceiving the Arabs into taking up arms. The British government, he wrote, had "raised the Arabs to fight for us by definite promises of self-government afterwards." But as history records, those promises were worthless; after the war, Britain and France divided up the Arab lands between themselves.