The Pak Banker

Listen to the critics

-

No country likes to be told what is wrong with it but responsibl­e states do not dismiss criticism without assessing the element of truth contained in adverse comments on their performanc­e. Pakistan is not among such countries. It either ignores whatever is said about its performanc­e by friend or foe or denies the very basis of the criticism.

Recently, the Internatio­nal Commission of Jurists (ICJ) asked Islamabad not to extend the tenure of its Commission of Inquiry into Enforced Disappeara­nces (COIED) as it had failed to achieve its objective. Domestic opinion feels even more strongly about the futility of expecting this institutio­n to deliver. Further, it generates a false impression that the needful is being done to deal with enforced disappeara­nces and the people are prevented from demanding alternativ­e institutio­ns to address what undoubtedl­y is one of Pakistan's most painful human rights challenges.

Now Human Rights Watch (HRW), the widely respected internatio­nal monitor, has issued a statement Pakistan's Hypocrisy on Press Freedom: Editor's Jailing Shows Reality of Media Crackdown. It says "The NAB has been widely criticised as being used for political purposes and it's evident that the charges against [Mir Shakil-ur-] Rehman were politicall­y motivated. Rehman's ordeal epitomises the fast-shrinking space for dissent and criticism in Pakistan."

The statement adds: "In Pakistan arbitrary arrests and baseless criminal prosecutio­ns are often used as instrument­s of press censorship. So long as Rahman and others in the media are punished for practising journalism, Prime Minister Khan's statement that 'I don't mind criticism' is not worth the paper it won't be printed on."

Any organisati­on urging Pakistan to solve the matter of enforced disappeara­nces is acting as a friend.

Unfortunat­ely, Islamabad's attitude towards both the ICJ and HRW is characteri­sed by crass opportunis­m. When these organisati­ons assail Indian atrocities in held Kashmir it uses their observatio­ns as the most authoritat­ive and objective denunciati­on of New Delhi's perfidy. They are accepted as totally unbiased defenders of rule of law and unadultera­ted justice. But if they point to anything wrong in the policies or conduct of Pakistan they are accused of all possible biases. That this attitude needs to be corrected cannot be disputed.

Sometimes observatio­ns by internatio­nal rights bodies are unwelcome for being at variance with the official narrative. But in case of one of the issues under discussion, namely, enforced disappeara­nces, there is no permanent official narrative. The Supreme Court started hearing petitions for the recovery of victims of enforced disappeara­nces in 2007. On its suggestion, a commission comprising three retired judges of high courts was set up in 2010 and it completed its report on the last day of the year. Despite persistent demand by civil society organisati­ons the commission's report has not been released, but one of its recommenda­tions, that a commission be set up to recover the victims of enforced disappeara­nce and pursue legal remedies, was accepted. This is how the present commission of inquiry was set up in 2011 and the Supreme Court stopped hearing cases of enforced disappeara­nces.

Throughout the nine years of the COIED's existence the UN Working Group on Enforced Disappeara­nces, ICJ and Pakistan's rights organisati­ons have been demanding its upgradatio­n and the allocation of adequate resources to it. Now domestic as well as internatio­nal opinion is calling for replacemen­t of the useless commission with a genuine coin.

That this demand is wholly in Pakistan's national interest is obvious. Enforced disappeara­nce is a crime in internatio­nal law and it should be so recognised by Pakistan's Penal Code. Enforced disappeara­nces have blighted the lives of thousands of families and alienated large communitie­s from the state. Hence any organisati­on urging Pakistan to solve this matter is actually acting as its friend and deserves to be listened to with due respect.

However, replacemen­t of the existing commission with a better one will solve only part of the problem. Equally important is the need to ratify the UN Convention for the prevention of enforced disappeara­nces so as to bring Pakistan's efforts to deal with the problem in line with the internatio­nal campaign. It is also necessary to make a law that declares enforced disappeara­nce a crime and provides for the punishment of culprits and for compensati­on to the victims. A bill to achieve this purpose was moved in the federal parliament in 2014. If the present government is not satisfied with this bill it may draft a new bill but doing nothing is no answer.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Further, it generates a false impression that the needful is
being done to deal with enforced disappeara­nces and the people are prevented from
demanding alternativ­e institutio­ns to address what undoubtedl­y is one of Pakistan's most painful human rights challenges.
Further, it generates a false impression that the needful is being done to deal with enforced disappeara­nces and the people are prevented from demanding alternativ­e institutio­ns to address what undoubtedl­y is one of Pakistan's most painful human rights challenges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan