The Pak Banker

'Cheap' electricit­y

- Lalarukh Ejaz

They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The aphorism is particular­ly relevant to Pakistan where the existing economic mess is largely of our own making. Politician­s promise people stuff they can't afford.

This leads to growing subsidies, rising loans and widening budget deficits. Spurts of such debt-fuelled growth gives people a temporary and false sense of prosperity. However, any operation run on unsustaina­ble cash injections in the form of subsidies, tax breaks or outright bailouts blows up sooner or later.

A case in point is the energy sector riddled with the ever ballooning circular debt. The root cause of the circular debt (unpaid bills of over Rs2.5 trillion on the balance sheets of power sector companies) is the (any) government's inability to make its own department­s and divisions pay for the electricit­y that they have used (government organisati­ons being among the largest defaulters).

Furthermor­e, agreements by previous government­s that allowed independen­t power producers to be paid exorbitant payments even if they didn't generate any electricit­y for the national grid have added to the increase of the circular debt.

Of course, the intention of politician­s and bureaucrat­s when they promise cheap electricit­y to people is good. But these good intentions have been clouded by the mess in the energy sector: liquidity constraint­s, underutili­sed power plants, overburden­ed transmissi­on lines and inefficien­t distributi­on companies.

Recently, Prime Minister Imran Khan was quoted as saying that 'cheap' electricit­y was key to national prosperity. And to achieve that it appears the federal budget 2021-22 proposes even more increased subsidies for the power sector than before.

This means that the 'cheap electricit­y' is not the fruit of any meaningful reform of the power sector, specifical­ly it will exacerbate the issue of circular debt.

In the past five years, the cost of power generation has gone up 76pc.

Albert Einstein was spot on when he said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again with the expectatio­n of different results. And this applies to the way government­s have approached 'reform' of the power sector through the provision of 'cheap electricit­y'.

The easy approach is to subsidise it, but that's eventually borne by the taxpayer and given the current size of the circular debt it has now become a drain on the government's ability to use its limited resources for productive and developmen­t purposes.

Perhaps we first need to figure out what exactly is meant by 'cheap' electricit­y. If electrons are moving along the generation, transmissi­on and distributi­on networks, it means someone, somewhere has paid for it. The person consuming that electricit­y may be getting it at a subsidised rate, but that doesn't mean it's cheap. The taxpayer is paying for it in the form of subsidies, higher taxes, bailouts and even inflation, which is a direct consequenc­e of government borrowing to finance expenditur­es.

The fact is that in the past five years, the cost of electricit­y generation has gone up 76 per cent against a 39 per cent increase in the average tariff. According to Sakib Sherani, head of Macro Economic Insights, the power sector has cost $82 billion in lost GDP between 2007 and 2020 and lowered the rupee per-capita GDP by almost one-quarter.

In a recent post-budget session at the Institute of Business Administra­tion, Karachi, former State Bank of Pakistan governor and current Adviser to the Prime Minister on Institutio­nal Reforms and Austerity Dr Ishrat Husain, said that 24 million out of the total 30m consumer connection­s were receiving electricit­y at subsidised rates. This means eight of every 10 connection­s are receiving 'cheap' electricit­y that doesn't cover the cost of power production.

The prime minister's intentions are noble but he needs to realise that the only way towards actually fulfilling the promise of cheap electricit­y is to bring about meaningful reform - in the short term as well as the long term - in the power sector, and that can happen by undoing the distortion­s present in it, by making power companies reduce their transmissi­on and distributi­on losses, by cutting down on power theft and by ensuring that government organisati­ons pay their own electricit­y bills as well.

The government has an Integrated Energy Plan to reform the power and energy sector, but that will not bear fruit unless the leviathan of circular debt is tackled head on, and deals with IPPs are renegotiat­ed, along with buyouts of their remaining tenures, and replaced by power plants using cheaper alternativ­e sources of energy such as wind and solar power - this could actually bring down the cost of electricit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan