In Jordan sedition trial, US defendant alleges torture
A US citizen and former top aide to Jordan's King Abdullah II alleged he was tortured in Jordanian detention and fears for his life, his U.S.-based lawyer said Sunday, on the eve of a verdict in the high-profile sedition trial linked to a rare public rift in the kingdom's ruling family.
Along with the mistreatment allegations, the closed-door trial before Jordan's state security court "has been completely unfair," Michael Sullivan, a former federal prosecutor hired by defendant Bassem Awadallah's U.S.based family, told The Associated Press.
The allegations of mistreatment, denied by
Jordanian officials Sunday, were raised just days before Jordan's king is to become the first Arab leader to meet with President Joe Biden at the White House on July 19. Jordan is a key Western ally in an unstable Middle East.
Awadallah and co-defendant Sharif Hassan bin Zaid, a distant cousin of the king, have pleaded not guilty to sedition and incitement charges, which carry lengthy prison terms.
The defendants were accused of conspiring with a senior royal - Prince Hamzah, a half-brother of the king - to foment unrest against the monarch while soliciting foreign help. The indictment portrayed Hamzah as a disgruntled royal who never forgave Abdullah for taking away his title of crown prince in 2004. Hamzah, who was placed under house arrest in April and has been seen in public just once since then, denied he incited against the king, saying he was being punished for calling out high-level corruption.
Despite the serious nature of the charges against Awadallah and bin Zaid, the trial ended after just six sessions. The court denied requests by Jordanian defense lawyers to call witnesses and prosecutors only shared purported transcripts, but not audio, from surveillance of the alleged plotters.
The prosecutor's office at the state security court denied the trial was unfair. Awadallah was "guaranteed due process" in line with Jordanian law, the prosecutor said in a statement to the AP. "He has not been mistreated in any way, and his allegations of torture of any kind are false." The U.S. State Department said that U.S. consular officials visited Awadallah five times and that "we also take seriously any allegations of abuse and lack of minimum fair trial guarantees."
Sullivan, a former U.S. attorney for Massachusetts and former acting director of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, said that based on the way the trial was conducted, a guilty verdict appeared to be a foregone conclusion. He said any conviction would be appealed.
The U.S. legal team, which has remained in the background until now, will play a more open role in the appeals stage, said Sullivan. He said the aim is to raise awareness about
Awadallah's case in the United States and internationally. This includes "the serious concerns about his safety and security in the short term and the complete unfairness in terms of the process, as well as obviously the torture and violation of a number of international conventions, treaties and laws," Sullivan said.
The prosecutor's office said Awadallah didn't raise torture allegations during the court hearings, his 17 meetings with his Jordanian lawyer or the first four meetings with U.S. consular officials in Jordan.
"He only made these claims at his most recent meeting with the consul, as the ruling's pronouncement (verdict) neared," the statement said.