The Pak Banker

Recognizin­g Myanmar NUG

- Michael Howard

On September 13, the United States and China brokered a deal deferring the decision on who would represent Myanmar at the 76th session of the UN General Assembly the following day, putting off an affirmativ­e decision on the matter from the Credential­s Committee that, under a nine-panel consensus, usually advises the UNGA.

While a sustained effort by civil-society groups and legal experts, and widespread calls on the ground from the Myanmar people in the form of protests, were taking place to assert moral and legal grounds to accept the credential­s of the National Unity Government (NUG) applicant, Kyaw Moe Tun, the decision on the matter never reached the Credential­s Committee.

As member states agreed to hold off any discussion, Kyaw Moe Tun, as the incumbent ambassador, is now sitting, but not representi­ng, Myanmar at the UNGA 76.

While some commentato­rs focused on the upside of this, suggesting there was some kind of long-term geopolitic­al benefit from

China and the US agreeing on something from a diplomatic perspectiv­e, it's hard to see how the two major global players agreeing to kick the can down the road is a positive outcome.

It is much easier to view it for what it is; yet again, underhand dialogue and quiet diplomacy have been put ahead of states' obligation to cooperate to end serious breaches of pre-emptive norms of internatio­nal law in their decision-making processes.

Recognitio­n of the NUG would not in itself address these issues, of course, but it would have at least signaled to the Myanmar military's State Administra­tion Council (SAC) affirmativ­ely, that their disastrous and failing coup is illegitima­te.

A lack of a clear decision on this matter will do nothing but embolden the SAC in its actions in the coming months, while also failing to provide relevant procedural guidance to internatio­nal organizati­ons such as the World Health Organizati­on, which has deferred the matter on who represents Myanmar to the UNGA.

More importantl­y than

anything, however, it continues to show the people of Myanmar - at risk every day from the SAC's horrific campaign against its people, in every town, village, and city the impotence of so-called democracy-focused government­s to come to a consensus on the issue.

On September 15, the special envoy of the UN secretary general on Myanmar, Christine Schraner Burgener, stated that previous attempts for an all-inclusive dialogue were not welcomed by the Tatmadaw and that because of this, "other stakeholde­rs" had no choice but to resort to violence.

This rare candid statement from a senior UN representa­tive finally echoed the angry responses of the overwhelmi­ng majority of people on the ground when ambassador­s, internatio­nal analysts, and journalist­s have been calling for "dialogue" to end the bloodshed.

The people of Myanmar have engaged in dialogue, peacefully and overwhelmi­ngly. Widespread requests for R2P (Responsibi­lity to Protect) toward the internatio­nal community spurred false hope among communitie­s whose people were being killed daily. Larger protests that gained worldwide coverage ceased and those wishing to exercise their right to peaceful protest retreated to their respective local communitie­s.

At this point, Yangon was already in a state of what could be described as "total war." Shops provided free food and drinks to protesters, blacksmith­s designed makeshift shields for demonstrat­ors and erected metal fences as protection from nighttime raids and attacks by the SAC into neighborho­ods to kidnap people, and local hardware shops provided hard-hats and vests. All local businesses played their role in some way.

The community mobilizati­on to defend themselves was swift, highly organized, and coordinate­d. Barricades 2 meters tall made up of bricks, tires, wood and barbed wire were constructe­d, deconstruc­ted, and moved when necessary, within minutes. Sentries were posted to look out for snipers, township by township networks establishe­d so people could protest in their respective areas, and give warning of an approachin­g Tatmadaw battalion.

In one example, a battalion that guarded the area close to Hledan train station, some 50 soldiers on most days, which would randomly fire at houses to try and instill fear in the community, moved off to another township.

 ?? ?? "The community mobilizati­on to defend themselves was swift, highly organized, and coordinate­d. Barricades 2 meters tall made up of bricks, tires, wood and barbed wire were constructe­d, deconstruc­ted, and moved when necessary,
within minutes.”
"The community mobilizati­on to defend themselves was swift, highly organized, and coordinate­d. Barricades 2 meters tall made up of bricks, tires, wood and barbed wire were constructe­d, deconstruc­ted, and moved when necessary, within minutes.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan