The Pak Banker

A new Afghan policy

- Muhammad Amir Rana cooperatio­n-based approach other multiple advantages.

With the Taliban having banned their education, Pakistan can allow Afghan female students to complete their degrees in Pakistan. This would allow the country to embark on a new Afghan policy, which it direly needs after its recent disappoint­ments with the Taliban regime.

Pakistan's Afghan policy has remained strategic-centric, which needs a radical transforma­tion. A new Afghan policy should focus on a broader engagement with the Afghan people and the regime in power.

In the recent past, civilian and military leaders made tall claims about geoeconomi­c insertions in the country's foreign policy priorities, but in reality, the whole design remained geostrateg­ic in nature. The reason for this lies in the simplistic view that both come at each other's cost. But a state can adjust both within its vision, as geopolitic­s and geoeconomi­cs are not different entities at all.

The Taliban takeover of Afghanista­n has compounded Pakistan's security challenges. It has caused frustratio­n among the architects of the Afghan policy as the country has not yet obtained the cooperatio­n it had expected from the Taliban. The state institutio­ns must adopt a cooperatio­n-based approach toward the Taliban.

The Taliban are a reality, and they are not going to disappear from the scene, at least in the near future. They seek to develop their political capital in the region through economic cooperatio­n and engagement. However, their policies towards women, political and ethnic opposition, and terrorist networks will continue raising new domestic and internatio­nal challenges for them.

There are equal chances of them bringing about a mid- to long-term order or disorder in the country, depending on their attitude and internal consensus. Pakistan may have little influence left now to guide or advise the Taliban.

Pakistan needs a delicate approach towards Afghanista­n, which should not be based on appeasemen­t or hostility. A hostile approach could aggravate the bitterness in bilateral relations, and in case the Taliban regime succeeds in establishi­ng order, it can bring Afghanista­n to where it was before their takeover.

If the Taliban become weakened, they have the full potential to transform again into an insurgent movement and start exporting terrorism globally. In the worst-case scenario, Pakistan would be the first country to be affected.

Apart from the TTP, their closest ally, the Afghan Taliban have their support base in the bordering regions. Many commanders within the Taliban support the TTP's desire to establish a tribal emirate in their fashion. In such a complex scenario, what should Pakistan do?

The National Security Committee has rightly posited that the state will deal directly with the Taliban regime regarding the TTP and border security issues. There is no need to repeat that Pakistan should not take any dictation from the Taliban that the TTP is the country's internal issue, but at the same time, political leaders and commentato­rs should avoid issuing hostile statements against the Taliban. Such statements make the bilateral engagement process difficult and increase the risk of terrorism. It is also vital that the state refrain from giving any indication of resuming talks with the TTP, as it indicates the state's weakness.

A

must revolve around five components, including border security, counterter­rorism, economic cooperatio­n, joint transnatio­nal engagement­s, and people-to-people contacts. All these components should amalgamate with each other, and a constant review must be part of the policy.

For the security and counterter­rorism components, a bilateral engagement formula was agreed upon between Afghanista­n and Pakistan in 2018 called the Afghanista­n-Pakistan Action Plan for Peace and Solidarity (APAPPS). The initiative's primary focus was on taking effective action against fugitives and irreconcil­able elements posing security threats to either of the two countries. Both sides agreed that the two countries shall avoid violations, whether aerial or otherwise, of each other's territory, apart from avoiding blame games.

It is understand­able that APAPPS was not rigorously implemente­d by both sides at that time, but with the Taliban regime it is a different scenario, and the initiative can be revamped on the pattern of the Doha agreement between the Taliban and the US.

The bilateral and transnatio­nal economic engagement was an old dream of the Pakistani establishm­ent, which needs to be rationalis­ed according to changing geopolitic­s.

However, people-to-people contact should be a vital component of the policy and built around something other than the old mantra of religious, cultural, and historical ties between the two countries.

The component should be developed on a framework of confidence-building measures and practical cooperatio­n among the citizens of the two countries. Offering education to female students in Khyber Pakhtunkhw­a and Balochista­n universiti­es would not be a culture shock for Afghan students. The new public universiti­es in bordering regions can take up the task effectivel­y.

It will have multiple advantages, from meeting the financial needs of the suffering public universiti­es to enhancing Pakistan's internatio­nal image. Similarly, revamping the idea of setting up trade centres and medical cities along the border is also important for both sides. It will not only help Afghan citizens get better health facilities but also reduce the appeal of the terrorist organisati­ons in these areas, apart from

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan