Daesh is not a tool of intelligence agencies

Daesh may have claimed responsibility for the terror attack in the suburbs of Moscow, but many refuse to accept that the extremist group was behind it. The terrorists responsible have told us that they planned and carried out the operation, and denialists say, no, they did not.

This reminds me of the justifications some Western analysts gave for Al-Qaeda terrorism in the past and even now.

Al-Qaeda’s leaders and ideologues believe in a “takfiri” ideology that compels them to sacrifice in its name and accuse even those close to them of being infidels. However, theorists in the West have argued that 9/11 and other attacks are the result of American expansion, modern imperialism, and modernity’s assault on societies that reject it.

I once attended a lecture at a Western university in which the professor made all of these arguments to the students, but forgot to present the simple explanation: Extremism breeds terrorism.

He also neglected to mention that extremists do not leave their mothers’ wombs as extremists. They are born normal, healthy individuals, but then immerse themselves in a culture that turns them into extremists before climbing the professional ladder to become terrorists.

The latest excuse is that Daesh is a tool of intelligence, and some deluded individuals on social media even claim that former US President Barack Obama was its founder. They are echoing former US President Donald Trump’s simplistic and malicious statements accusing Obama of being behind Daesh, implying that his withdrawal from Iraq created a vacuum filled by the terrorist organization. In both cases, the claim is baseless.

Daesh told us so in its latest announcement, explaining that extremist ideology is its ultimate motivator.

While countries or organizations could resort to using the group, it was formed and exists because of extremist ideology, and destroying it demands rooting out the extremist thought that brought it to life in the first place.

But why fabricate such excuses? Some of those who make these arguments are well-intentioned individuals who are deceived by this propaganda and want to avoid blaming Islam. They thus seek comforting justifications.

However, Islam, a great religion, is not at all to blame. Extremist thought and the Islamic faith are two very different things that have unfortunately come to be seen as one and the same.

Indeed, in recent decades, we have seen many Sunni and Shiite terrorist organizations, such as AlQaeda and its branches, Daesh with its offshoots, Hezbollah, and Asaib Ahl Al-Haq, effectively hijack this religion, branding others as infidels in their discourse, or killing them with suicide attacks or car bombs. This is a crisis of extremist thought, and let us remember that while Russia was the victim of this bloody massacre, Muslim countries are the primary targets of these terrorist organizations.

Society bears responsibility for a peaceful boy’s transformation into a heartless monster in just a few years; we cannot blame him alone. If he had grown up in an environment that taught him to be tolerant and rational, and explained the humanitarian essence of all religions to him from an early age, at home, school, in the mosque, and through television, would he have grown up to be a terrorist?

Of course not, he would be a well-adjusted, tolerant, and good person who seeks to do good for humanity and serves it (as well as himself, as we all do). He would not blow himself up to kill children, or run them over with a truck like insects under the pretext that they are infidels.

However, most of those who reiterate these accusations that Daesh is a tool of intelligence services are malicious actors. Their intentions are clear and simple: They do not want to scrutinize extremist thought, and so they mix things together. They are the same people who consistently insist that the perpetrators are mentally ill and deranged, which is also another excuse meant to distort the issue by shifting it from an ideological and cultural matter to a public health issue. Psychiatric patients go to clinics, and we do not see them organizing themselves into disciplined armed groups, burning businesses to the ground, and bombing mosques.

These claims are illusions, and now they speak of a culture clash with the West and are turning it into fodder for extremist thought, in order to find excuses for this thought and ways to avoid confronting it.

"They are the same people who consistently insist that the perpetrators are mentally ill and deranged, which is also another excuse meant to distort the issue by shifting it from an ideological and cultural matter to a public health issue."