South Korea court rejects Park’s evidence on disaster mystery
SEOUL — The court hearing South Korean President Park Geun-Hye’s impeachment trial on Tuesday dismissed as “unsatisfactory” attempts to explain her whereabouts during the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster.
Parliament voted to impeach Ms. Park last month over an influence-peddling scandal that has brought hundreds of thousands of protesters onto the streets every week demanding her removal.
At the time of the vote lawmakers also said allegations that Ms. Park failed to carry out her official duties as the head of state during the ferry sinking were also grounds for her removal from office.
The Constitutional Court last month urged Ms. Park’s defense counsel to clarify the mystery surrounding her seven-hour absence during the disaster that claimed more than 300 lives, mostly school children.
Unconfirmed media reports have suggested a wide range of theories about her whereabouts, including a romantic liaison, participation in a shamanistic ritual, cosmetic surgery or a 90-minute hair styling.
Ms. Park’s lawyers said Tuesday that she had felt unwell on the morning of the disaster and stayed at her residence instead of her office — both within the presidential Blue House complex.
They submitted documents to the Constitutional Court showing timelines of her receiving reports by phone or from her aides about the disaster and issuing directives.
But Justice Lee Jin- Sung, one of the nine members of the court, told Ms. Park’s legal team that the timelines failed to clarify exactly when and how she first came to learn about the sinking.
“The answer from the president’s side fell short of expectations and was somewhat unsatisfactory,” Mr. Lee was quoted by Yonhap news agency as saying.
Mr. Lee noted that TV channels broke the story just after 9:00 a.m. local time and said Ms. Park should clarify whether or not she was watching the news at the time.
“(Park) received numerous phone calls from the chief of the National Security Office and gave orders,” Lee Joong-hwan, a lawyer representing Ms. Park, told reporters on the sidelines of the hearing. “She took appropriate steps.” However, representatives from parliament told the hearing that neither the top national security advisor nor the chief of the presidential secretariat knew where Ms. Park was at the time of the disaster.
“The president’s inactivity was in breach of the victims’ rights to life and their relatives’ rights to pursue happiness,” they told the court. “She must be deprived of her presidency immediately.”
Ms. Park is accused of colluding with a longtime friend, Choi SoonIl, to strong-arm donations worth tens of millions of dollars from top firms which were then funneled to dubious foundations.
Should the Constitutional Court confirm Ms. Park’s impeachment, the next presidential election would have to take place within 60 days from the court’s ruling.