Business World

Mining council buckles down for review ‘… THIS IS THE LAW’

- E. J. C.

THE GOVERNMENT is scrambling to contain spreading business concern over twin decisions by the Environmen­t department earlier this month to cancel the permits of nearly a hundred mine projects, so far, with the Mining Industry Coordinati­ng Council (MICC) buckling down this afternoon to organize a review sought by miners.

A Feb. 17 memorandum of the National Economic and Developmen­t Authority ( NEDA) called the 19 members of the council to an “MICC-Multi Stakeholde­r Review Team Organizati­onal Meeting” at 2 p.m. this afternoon at the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas compound in Manila.

The Department of Environmen­t and Natural Resources ( DENR) last Feb. 2 announced its decision to shutter 23 of the country’s 41 operationa­l metal mines and suspend five others for violations such as being located in watersheds and polluting surroundin­g bodies of water, sparking an industry outcry that prompted the MICC to convene a week later.

At the end of the Feb. 9 meeting, the MICC — consisting of members of the Cabinet clusters on Economic Developmen­t and on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation plus representa­tives of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples and of the Union of Local Authoritie­s of the Philippine­s — issued a resolution providing for a “multi-stakeholde­r review” and ensuring that due process, which miners say has been lacking, is observed.

That meeting was followed five days later by DENR’s announceme­nt that it was putting 75 undevelope­d mines nationwide on the chopping block as well.

Affected miners have said they would appeal to President Rodrigo R. Duterte and some said they were ready to take the DENR to court.

Business groups had initially said the impact of sanctions should not spill out from the industry, but announceme­nt of the 75 other projects for terminatio­n spawned warnings of erosion of general investor sentiment.

In a statement yesterday, the Finance department quoted Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III — who co-chairs the MICC with Environmen­t Sec. Regina Paz “Gina” L. Lopez — as saying MICC’s “technical working group… will decide what to do” next.

“As discussed during the (Feb. 9) MICC meeting… there is a need to observe due process,” the statement read, quoting Bayani H. Agabin, Finance undersecre­tary in charge of the Legal Services and the Domestic Finance groups.

“Due process is both substantiv­e and procedural. Substantiv­e due process means that there are valid grounds in law to support the cancellati­on. Procedural due process means the procedure for cancellati­on as provided for in the contract or under relevant laws was followed,” he explained of the technical working group’s focus of review.

While it remains to be seen how much time the review of DENR’s decision will take, Mr. Dominguez reiterated to reporters last Friday that the process will look into each affected miner’s contract with the government. Republic Act No. 7942, or the Mining Act of 1995, provided two kinds of such contracts: mineral production sharing agreements ( MPSAs) that allow 60% foreign ownership and financial or technical assistance that allow full foreign ownership.

There are 311 MPSAs, including those of the 98 projects now up for terminatio­n.

“[ I] t is the resolution of the entire MICC that it’s important to follow the due process. If you read that ( resolution), I think ‘due process’ is mentioned two or three times,” Mr. Dominguez told reporters last Friday.

“And, by the way, each case is different ha, because they are individual contracts and I’m not sure that all the contracts have the same terms,” the Finance chief emphasized.

“And as the SolGen (Solicitor General Jose C. Calida) said during the (Feb. 9 MICC) meeting: what is the law is the contract. The law between the parties is the contract. So you have to look at the contract.”

Asked to react to Ms. Lopez’s descriptio­n of the MICC as just a recommenda­tory body that cannot change her ruling, Mr. Dominguez replied: “Following due process is not recommenda­tory — that is the law.”

“The law is not recommenda­tory. The law is to be followed. And we are reminding that this is the law.”

SIGNALS MIXED

Mr. Duterte himself has sent mixed signals on the matter, expressing unqualifie­d support for Ms. Lopez last Feb. 2 — a few hours after she first announced mines to be sanctioned — then seemingly backpedali­ng during dinner last Friday in Baguio City with members of Philippine Military Academy (PMA) Class 1967 and then saying in his speech before PMA cadets and alumni the following morning that “manmade diseases like extractive industries” threatened the country.

“Kay Gina Lopez… ang gulo na (The issue with Gina Lopez is getting out of hand),” Mr. Duterte said in his speech last Friday evening.

“But… I will review. There’s such a thing as… exhaustion of administra­tive remedies,” he added.

“I will… not judge her now… kung mali talaga, eh wala akong magagawa, if it’s destructiv­e to the environmen­t [ then there is nothing I can do but uphold Ms. Lopez’s decision to shutter mines and suspend others],” he explained, adding, however: “But if… medyo (the damage is not that much)… then we correct it.”

At the same time, he acknowledg­ed that mining’s gross value added to the economy — though estimated at less than one percent of gross domestic product since at least 2012, a year after the government stopped processing new permits — was still a factor to consider.

“We get something like P70 billion a year out of mining operations in the Philippine­s, so… we have to also take (that) into considerat­ion…” Mr. Duterte told members of PMA Class 1967.

Miners have been reeling from unfriendly state policy since 2011, when the administra­tion of former president Benigno S. C. Aquino III imposed a moratorium on new mining permits that was extended indefinite­ly through Executive Order No. 79 — which formed the MICC — signed on July 6, 2012.

MGB reported last Feb. 2 that metal mineral production dropped eight percent to P100.56 billion last year from 2015’s P109.84 billion, blaming “[p]oor base metal price, a string of mine suspension and... non-operation due to unfavorabl­e weather conditions” for the sector’s “lackluster performanc­e.” — reports from Janina C. Lim with Tubayan

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines