Business World

The case of supporting the Philippine­s during the PCA arbitratio­n

Japan’s goal is to assist the Philippine­s to improve its surveillan­ce capabiliti­es in the light of increasing Chinese maritime activities.

- RENATO CRUZ DE CASTRO

In July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitratio­n (PCA) in The Hague announced its long-awaited ruling on the protracted maritime dispute between the Philippine­s and China. The PCA ruled in favor of the Philippine­s in 14 of its 15 claims against China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea. The court declared that China’s claims — defined by the ninedash line — violate internatio­nal law. The tribunal concluded that whatever historic rights China had to the resources in the waters of the South China Sea were extinguish­ed when it ratified the United Nations’ Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS).

It also noted that, although Chinese navigators and fishermen, as well as those of other states, had traditiona­lly used the land features in the South China Sea, there was no historical evidence that China had exercised exclusive control over the waters or their resources. The tribunal asserted that historical navigation and fishing by Chinese navigators involved the exercise of high seas freedom, rather than a historic right. The PCA ruling was a major victory for the Philippine­s.

JAPAN’S PROACTIVE APPROACH TO MARITIME SECURITY

The Philippine­s’ filing against China could be traced to the three-month long standoff between a lone Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) vessel and Chinese civilian ships off Scarboroug­h Shoal in 2012. In mid-June 2012, after the Philippine­s withdrew its lone vessel, China took control over Scarboroug­h. Chinese Maritime Surveillan­ce (CMS) personnel constructe­d a chain barrier across the mouth of the shoal to block Philippine access to it. China also deployed these vessels to protect Chinese fishing boats operating deep into the Philippine­s’ EEZ.

In January 2013, the Philippine­s directly confronted the Chinese approach during the Scarboroug­h Shoal impasse by filing a statement of claim against China in the PCA at The Hague. As expected, China did not participat­e in the proceeding­s, citing its policy of resolving disputes on territoria­l and maritime rights only through direct consultati­on and negotiatio­n with the countries involved.

Japan, however, sent representa­tives to the hearing. Throughout the two-year proceeding­s of the Philippine­s’ claim on China on the South China Sea dispute, Japan consistent­ly communicat­ed its unequivoca­l backing to the Philippine­s’ approach on the basis of internatio­nal law. On May 23, 2013, no less than Prime Minister Abe conveyed his country’s support to the Philippine­s’ decision. Tokyo’s public encouragem­ent to Manila in its claims against Beijing brought to light Japan’s determinat­ion to prevent any unilateral action that may change the status quo in the

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines