Could America shield Alaska from a North Korean missile?

WASHINGTON — It is every Alaskan’s nightmare: finding themselves within range of a North Korean missile. As that fear came one step closer to reality this week, America’s ability to block an incoming attack is under scrutiny.

On Tuesday the northwestern US state awoke to the news that Pyongyang had test-fired an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which — though it came crashing down in the Sea of Japan — had a probable range of over 5,500 kilometers (3,400 miles), enough to reach Alaskan shores.

The US military has faith that its high-tech defensive systems could fend off any attack from North Korea — at least for now.

“It’s something we have confidence in,” said Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain Jeff Davis, who called the latest development a “nascent threat.”

But other observers are not so sure, rattled by the pace of Kim Jong-Un’s missile program and his stated aim of building a nuclear-tipped ICBM.

“Now more than ever, it’s imperative for Alaskans and the rest of the nation that we be prepared,” tweeted Senator Dan Sullivan, one of several Alaskan congressmen who backed a bipartisan bill last month aimed at expanding US missile defenses.

The state of 750,000 people already hosts a key element of the country’s current defense system.

The Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system — installed at Fort Greely, about 100 miles outside Fairbanks in Alaska, and California’s Vandenberg Air Force Base — will comprise 44 missile interceptors by the end of the year.

But if the backers of the Advancing America’s Missile Defense Act of 2017 have their way, the government would authorize an additional 28 groundbased interceptors at Fort Greely.

Among the bill’s co-sponsors is Alaskan Congressmen Don Young, who believes “the recent actions by North Korea, a rogue and irrational regime, underscores the importance of Alaska’s missile defense systems,” his office said in a statement. —