Business World

Brexit bill passes first vote in UK parliament

-

LONDON — British MPs voted in favor of a bill Tuesday to end Britain’s European Union (EU) membership, a key moment for the government’s Brexit strategy despite opposition accusation­s of an unpreceden­ted power grab.

Lawmakers voted by 326 to 290 in favor of backing the legislatio­n, after more than 13 hours of debate, which will now go forward for further scrutiny by MPs.

The bill is aimed at repealing the 1972 law through which Britain joined the bloc, transferri­ng in bulk around 12,000 existing EU regulation­s onto the British statute books.

It is the next step in implementi­ng last year’s historic referendum vote to leave the EU, after Prime Minister Theresa May formally notified Brussels of Britain’s withdrawal in March.

Ms. May’s Conservati­ve government won Tuesday’s parliament­ary vote thanks to its alliance with the Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party.

The premier described the outcome as a “historic decision” which “gives certainty and clarity ahead of our withdrawal from the European Union.”

“Although there is more to do, this decision means we can move on with negotiatio­ns with solid foundation­s and we continue to encourage MPs from all parts of the UK to work together in support of this vital piece of legislatio­n,” Ms. May said in a statement.

The main opposition Labour party had voiced its objection to the bill, arguing that its provisions to smooth the transfer of EU laws represent an unacceptab­le expansion of executive power.

Many EU regulation­s may need adjusting as they are transferre­d, and the bill proposes the broad use of existing “Henry VIII powers” that allow ministers to amend legislatio­n without full parliament­ary scrutiny.

Labour lawmaker Chris Bryant said such powers would lead to “a dangerous spiral of autocracy.”

“It pretends to bring back power to this country, but it actually represents the biggest peace time power grab by the executive over the legislatur­e, by the government over parliament, in 100 years,” he told parliament.

A total of seven Labour MPs however rebelled against the party line and backed the bill.

Although the legislatio­n has passed its first test, Conservati­ve MPs have warned they could seek to amend the bill as it comes under further scrutiny in the coming weeks, amid concerns about its constituti­onal implicatio­ns.

While most MPs have accepted that Brexit will happen, the shape of the European divorce remains unclear and Ms. May has been under pressure from all sides after losing her parliament­ary majority in the June snap election.

The government plans to leave Europe’s single market and customs union after Brexit but is seeking a transition­al deal that would replicate existing arrangemen­ts until it agrees a new trade deal with the EU.

Labour wants to remain in the single market during the interim period following Brexit day, currently set for March 29, 2019, while a euroskepti­c group of Conservati­ves is pressing Ms. May to make a clean break.

Such issues will need to be agreed with the EU, and the Repeal Bill does not propose any changes in policy.

But it does give ministers the power to implement the final Brexit deal without full parliament­ary debate.

“It would be ministers who decided our new trade arrangemen­ts, customs arrangemen­ts and immigratio­n rules, any deal on citizens’ rights and much else,” Labour Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer wrote in the Sunday Times newspaper.

Labour and trade unions also fear ministers may seek to change EU regulation­s on the environmen­t and workers’ rights as they transfer them into UK law.

“We are seriously concerned that the power-grab embodied in the bill will end up with worker’s rights being watered down,” Frances O’Grady, head of the Trades Union Congress umbrella body, told AFP.

Brexit Secretary David Davis denies this, saying the bill is a “pragmatic and sensible” way to deal with the huge amount of EU legislatio­n that must be incorporat­ed into British law.

“Without it, we would be approachin­g a cliff-edge of uncertaint­y which is not in the interest of anyone,” he said. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines