Business World

Impeachmen­t raps vs Comelec chief trashed

- By Lira Dalangin-Fernandez interaksyo­n

THE IMPEACHMEN­T complaint against Commission on Election (Comelec) Chairman Andres D. Bautista was dismissed for insufficie­ncy in form Wednesday morning, Sept. 20, by the justice committee of the House of Representa­tives by a vote of 26-2.

“Finding it insufficie­nt in form, the complaint is deemed dismissed,” Oriental Mindoro Representa­tive Reynaldo V. Umali, the committee chairman, said.

The lawmakers trashed the complaint for using a verificati­on form used only for complaints endorsed by one-third members of the House.

The case against Mr. Bautista was filed by private individual­s — lawyer Ferdinand Topacio and former congressma­n Jacinto Paras — and endorsed by Representa­tives Gwen Garcia, Harry Roque and Abraham Tolentino.

A last- minute attempt by lawyer Manuelito Luna, counsel of the complainan­ts, to submit a substitute verificati­on, a move defended by Mr. Roque, was rejected by the justice committee.

Pampanga Representa­tive Juan Pablo Bondoc pointed out that the House had earlier decided during the impeachmen­t complaint of Magdalo Representa­tive Gary Alejano against President Rodrigo R. Duterte that it would be the last time the committee on justice would allow liberality for errors in form.

The complaint against Mr. Bautista was deemed initiated after it was referred in plenary on Sept. 7.

According to the Rules on Impeachmen­t Proceeding­s of the House, no impeachmen­t proceeding­s shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a year from when it was deemed initiated.

Albay Representa­tive Edcel Lagman and Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas both argued that the entire House membership and not the justice committee alone could decide on the substitute verificati­on since the complaint had been referred in plenary.

Mr. Lagman also said the substitute verificati­on had no legal bases in the House rules on impeachmen­t.

“There is no specific rule granting any party the right to amend the verificati­on or the complaint. It is flawed to take the position that just because the pleading or amendment is not prohibited, then it must be allowed,” Mr. Lagman said.

Mr. Tolentino, one of the endorsers, said he would continue to pray that Mr. Bautista resign from Comelec “to save the institutio­n, save himself and his family.”

The complaint alleged Mr. Bautista of culpably violating the Constituti­on and/or betraying public trust on the following circumstan­ces, among others:

• When he failed to truthfully, accurately or completely disclose to the public his statement of assets, liabilitie­s and net worth

• When he neglected his duties and responsibi­lities, particular­ly in collecting and further processing of personal data, which led to the unnecessar­y exposure of personal and sensitive informatio­n of millions of Filipinos

• When he cleared Smartmatic and Comelec IT specialist­s of any wrongdoing for the so-called script tweak during consolidat­ion and canvassing of results in the May 2016 elections

Before the filing of the complaint, Mr. Bautista’s estranged wife, Patricia, went public and accused him of allegedly amassing as much as P1 billion in unexplaine­d wealth.

Mr. Fariñas said that for the allegation­s to hold water, Patricia Bautista should have been one of the complainan­ts.

The House justice panel is also deliberati­ng an impeachmen­t complaint against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno, which it earlier found sufficient in form and in substance.

Reacting to the dismissal of the complaint, Mr. Bautista released the following statement:

“I welcome the decision of the House of Representa­tives Committee on Justice to dismiss the impeachmen­t complaint filed against me. I would like to thank the Committee and the House leadership for upholding the rule of law and for their objectivit­y and fairness.

“This proves to be a significan­t step in clearing my name after the malicious accusation­s hurled against me. As I have always maintained, the allegation­s are fabricated and baseless.

“With the dismissal of the complaint, it is business as usual at the Commission on Election. We, at the COMELEC, will continue to perform our mandate in respect of the credible conduct of Philippine elections.”

However, his wife called the dismissal just a “bump” in efforts to expose her husband’s alleged misdeeds.

“We remain undeterred, this is just the start, we believe in the system and in the goodness of the people and in their good sense … this is just a bump and go,” she said in an interview after the hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines