House clears P3.77-trillion nat’l budget for 2018

VOTING 223-9, the House of Representatives approved the proposed 2018 national budget on third and final reading on Tuesday, Sept. 26.

The proposed appropriations is P3.767 trillion, to be used for the Duterte administration’s massive infrastructure program, education, social services and the fight against illegal drugs.

The budget measure goes to the Senate for its own deliberation.

Magdalo party-list Representative Gary Alejano, one of the nine lawmakers who voted against it, said that, while the proposed budget aims to spur development, it also funds the government’s war on illegal drugs, which, he pointed out, is “based on dubious and questionable data, and lacks the holistic approach to address the root causes of the drug problem.”

Other lawmakers who voted against the budget included Buhay party-list Rep. Lito Atienza and the seven party-list Representatives from the Makabayan bloc: Carlos Zarate of Bayan Muna; Emmie de Jesus and Arlene Brosas of Gabriela; Antonio Tinio and France Castro of ACT Teachers; Ariel Casilao of Anakpawis; and, Sara Elago of Kabataan.

Ms. Brosas branded the budget as “Destroy, Destroy, Destroy,” in a counter-allusion to the administration’s infrastructure mantra “Build, Build, Build,” citing the uncertainty towards better lives for the people and the threat of demolition and displacement of thousands of families to be affected by infrastructure projects.

Mr. Tinio said the plenary voted without letting the members know about the amendments made by the small committee tasked to finalize the bill.

Cebu Rep. Raul del Mar and Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, while voting for the budget, criticized the slash on the appropriations of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR). The House earlier gave the CHR a P1,000 budget for purportedly not doing its mandate, but reconsidered at the last minute.

However, the appropriations committee did not fully restore the P649.48-million CHR’s original proposed new appropriations, giving it only P508.5 million.

“For this House to further reduce the CHR budget only sends the wrong signal about the importance of human rights. We must strengthen the institution, not weaken it,” Mr. Del Mar said.

According to Mr. Lagman, the “obliterated amount” for the CHR consisted of P47.040 million for human rights protection; P24.441 million for human rights promotion; P33.392 million for human rights policy advisory; and P10 million for equipment capital outlay.

“With its slashed budget, the CHR will be hampered in its human rights protection and promotion advocacy and programs,” Mr. Lagman said.