Business World

Senate to vote on quo warranto EDITORS

- By Camille A. Aguinaldo MARIFI S. JARA, RICKY S. TORRE

SENATE PRESIDENT Aquilino L. Pimentel III on Wednesday said the Senate as an impeachmen­t court would still need to vote on the validity of the quo warranto case on Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno if the Supreme Court decided to nullify her appointmen­t.

In a forum in Manila, Mr. Pimentel said they may proceed with the impeachmen­t trial in case the House of Representa­tives transmits the articles of impeachmen­t before the quo warranto case ruled against Ms. Sereno.

“If the majority says it was a valid removal, there’s no more need to remove because impeachmen­t is removal. If the majority says it’s invalid then from our point of view, there is someone to remove. We will proceed with the impeachmen­t,” he said.

The SC earlier held oral arguments on the quo warranto petition filed by the Office of the Solicitor-General (OSG) seeking to void Ms. Sereno’s appointmen­t as the country’s top judge due to her alleged failure to fully disclose her wealth. Acting Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio has said the SC en banc may decide on the case by the end of May.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Pantaleon D. Alvarez has said the lower chamber may impeach Ms. Sereno a week or two after congressio­nal sessions resume on May 15.

As the ball is still with the House of Representa­tives, Mr. Pimentel said the Senate would await the action of the House if the SC issued its ruling on the quo warranto case before the articles of impeachmen­t are transmitte­d.

“If the Supreme Court should decide on the quo warranto case against the Chief Justice, then let us see whether the House will accept the decision of the Supreme Court, and of course the people, we will see their reaction,” he said.

Meanwhile, Ms. Sereno during a forum on Wednesday reiterated that she was ready to face the impeachmen­t trial at the Senate, noting the reluctance of the House to transmit the articles of impeachmen­t even after the President’s orders to hasten the case.

“If they are so sure why are they so hesitant?... I can fully prove in the Senate with both documentar­y and testimonia­l evidence,” she said.

In a related developmen­t, the OSG has denied the petition of a private citizen asking Solicitor-General Jose C. Calida to initiate a quo warranto case against Associate Justice Teresita Leonardo-de Castro.

“The argument which the OSG propounded against Sereno does not apply to Justice De Castro since it was Sereno who was appointed as the Chief Justice without the qualificat­ions back in 2012. In view of the above, your request is denied for lack of merit,” the OSG stated in its April 23 letter to Jocelyn F. Acosta as released to the media on Wednesday.

Invoking the same grounds with Ms. Sereno’ case, Ms. Acosta said Ms. De Castro also failed to submit all her Statements of Assets, Liabilitie­s and Net Worth before the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) when she applied for the chief justice position in 2012. THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2018

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines