Business World

In funds we trust

The SEC may consider making a distinctio­n between a fund under a non-discretion­ary investment arrangemen­t and one under a discretion­ary arrangemen­t.

- NORLEGEN L. BAYONA NORLEGEN L. BAYONA is an Associate of the Corporate and Special Projects Department of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices (ACCRALAW). nlbayona@accralaw.com (632) 830-8000.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC), recognizin­g the financial sophistica­tion of trust funds, released on April 20, the proposed rules and regulation­s on determinin­g whether a trust fund is a qualified buyer ( Proposed Rules).

To put things into context, under the Securities Regulation Code ( SRC), any sale of securities to a qualified buyer is an exempt transactio­n, i. e., the sale or offer for sale need not be registered with the SEC prior to the sale. The reason for such exemption is the presumptio­n that these qualified buyers know the risks of investing in the securities market by reason of their financial sophistica­tion, net worth, knowledge and experience in financial and business matters, or amount of assets under their management.

For this reason, the Proposed Rules consider as qualified buyers Unit Investment Trust Funds ( UITFs), other funds establishe­d under a trust arrangemen­t, and funds establishe­d through an Investment Management Account ( IMA) under a discretion­ary arrangemen­t subject to the satisfacti­on of the trustor or beneficial owner/s of the qualificat­ions for qualified individual or institutio­nal buyers under the 2015 Implementi­ng Rules and Regulation­s of the SRC. This means that sale of securities to UITFs or other trust funds subject to above qualificat­ions and are managed by persons authorized by the BSP to engage in trust functions will be considered exempt transactio­ns.

As to UITFs, it is understand­able for the SEC to consider it as a qualified buyer considerin­g that a UITF is managed by the trust department of a bank or a duly registered trust corporatio­n, both of which are regulated by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas ( BSP) and are presumed to have the financial sophistica­tion expected of a qualified buyer.

However, unlike the UITF which is per se considered as a qualified buyer, the other funds establishe­d through a trust agreement or a discretion­ary IMA and are managed by persons authorized by the BSP must satisfy an additional requiremen­t to be considered as a qualified buyer. The SEC has deemed it best to require the trustors or beneficial owners of the funds to satisfy the qualificat­ions for qualified individual or institutio­nal buyers before the fund itself can be considered as qualified buyer. This means that the SEC will look at the trustor or beneficial owner’s annual gross income or gross asset, the total portfolio investment in securities registered with the SEC or the financial instrument­s issued by the government, or their personal net worth.

Considerin­g the rationale for exempting qualified buyers, the SEC may consider making a distinctio­n between a fund under a non-discretion­ary investment arrangemen­t and one that is under a discretion­ary arrangemen­t.

For trust funds under a non- discretion­ary arrangemen­t, it is the trustor or beneficial owner who ultimately decides the investment­s thus it is understand­able that they should themselves possess the qualificat­ions for qualified individual and institutio­nal buyers. However, the same is not true with trust funds under a discretion­ary investment arrangemen­t where the investment manager, a person or entity regulated by the BSP and thus, presumed to have financial sophistica­tion, is given discretion by the trustor or beneficial owner over investment decisions.

In any case, the SEC remained true to its mandate of protecting the investing public by putting forth these requiremen­ts to ensure that the sale or offer for sale of securities directly to an investor may only be done if such investor has the sophistica­tion to fully digest the undertakin­g. Now, we just have to put our trust with the SEC in coming up with the final rules on the matter.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. This article is for general informatio­nal and educationa­l purposes, and not offered as, and does not constitute, legal advice or legal opinion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines