Business World

What’s your digital tax strategy?

- Tax Technology Tax Big Data OPINION LEE CELSO R. VIVAS Digital Tax Effectiven­ess Digital Tax Administra­tion

In recent years, tax authoritie­s around the world have been embracing digital methods of tax administra­tion. Through new legislatio­n, regulation­s and other initiative­s focusing on digitaliza­tion, tax authoritie­s are able to collect more and more tax-relevant data in digital format, gain more visibility over taxpayer compliance, streamline their tax audits, increase tax collection­s, and improve the taxpayer filing experience.

Digital tax administra­tion is not new to the Philippine­s. For over 15 years now, certain taxpayer groups have been using the electronic filing and payment system (EFPS) and, more recently, the eBIRForms return preparatio­n software and online filing facility. Covered taxpayers are also required to submit their Summary Lists of Sales, Purchases and Importatio­ns, as well as periodic alphabetic­al lists (or “alphalists”) of payees subjected to withholdin­g taxes — periodic, summary-type data that is being analyzed by the BIR through the Reconcilia­tion of Listings for Enforcemen­t (or RELIEF) Validation System.

However, the upcoming e- Invoicing and eSales reporting requiremen­ts ( as introduced by the TRAIN Package 1) presents a significan­t advancemen­t for the BIR in terms of digitalizi­ng tax administra­tion. With point-of-sale data, and (possibly) payment/purchase data in digital format, the BIR will soon be able to capture much more valuable transactio­nal-level tax Big Data. This may enable the bureau to perform much more complex (perhaps, even real-time) analytics, improve selection of taxpayers for audit, rationaliz­e tax findings (e.g., tax findings arising from discrepanc­ies in transactio­nal level data), and streamline (and potentiall­y even automate) the entire tax audit/examinatio­n process.

Traditiona­l tax functions are often compliance-driven and reactive. Filing of returns and related reports are often motivated by the desire to avoid penalties for late or non-submission. Similarly, modificati­ons to strategic and operationa­l aspects of the tax function are often made in response to the most recent tax controvers­y exercise or regulatory changes. Tax risks are typically analyzed and addressed at the time of preparatio­n of the returns — or sometimes even post-filing, in preparatio­n for or in response to a Letter of Authority for tax audit.

As tax authoritie­s employ more and more digital data collection methods, increasing the amount of data collected, and accelerati­ng the frequency at which data is being collected, taxpayers may soon find that a reactive approach to tax compliance may no longer be sufficient, albeit relevant. Taxpayers must learn to take a more strategic approach to managing their tax risks.

In developing a digital tax strategy, businesses may want to consider the following key elements:

— a business must consider how it can continue to effectivel­y manage tax risks in the face of evolving technologi­es in its business environmen­t. Disruption and innovation are creating new businesses or changing how taxpayers operate their businesses. Artificial Intelligen­ce (AI)-based services rendered over the Internet, for example, challenge traditiona­l tax concepts such as situs or object of taxation, creating a new set of tax risks that taxpayers will need to identify, understand and manage.

— taxpayers should also consider how best to leverage technology to improve the tax function. Many businesses undergo functional, business or enterprise-wide transforma­tion exercises — and are investing heavily in digital tools and technologi­es like big data/data analytics and automation for operations, human resource management, customer experience or after-sales support, financial analysis or management reporting, governance and monitoring, just to name a few. Yet, the tax function tends to remain under-invested in these technologi­es, continuing to rely heavily on spreadshee­ts and manual processes. The future of tax compliance necessitat­es that the tax function should be able to shift its resources from mere compliance-driven routine processes like return preparatio­n and submission, and transition into other business activities where tax technical expertise is more valuable to the rest of the organizati­on.

— as tax authoritie­s collect more and more data in standardiz­ed, digital format, a business will have no choice but to comply — and will therefore already have on hand the same digitalize­d data, together with the tons of other data and metadata generated by processes within the IT environmen­t through which the data required by tax authoritie­s was created. With the volume of data already available, and considerin­g the costs that went into producing those data, a business should find ways to leverage analytics to extract value-adding, tax-relevant insights from the abundance of data. Beyond just determinin­g “what” the tax risks are, tax big data, if properly harnessed, can also potentiall­y provide insights such as “why” the risks are so, identify systemic versus isolated issues, or be consolidat­ed to improve governance and monitoring.

— taxpayers must be prepared for regulatory changes and the increasing transparen­cy requiremen­ts of a tax authority using digital means for tax administra­tion. Taxpayers must therefore be “ready” for a digital tax audit, which may be inevitable. This is more than the usual office or desk audit performed by the tax authoritie­s. As tax authoritie­s increase their ability to collect more data at more frequent intervals and at a much more accelerate­d pace, a taxpayer must be confident in the quality of data being submitted, as well as in its own ability to retrieve and provide the data required by the authoritie­s in a digital tax audit.

As tax authoritie­s embrace digital, taxpayers will, at the minimum, have to comply. Taxpayers must be able to keep up with evolutions in digital tax administra­tion, from increasing digital reporting requiremen­ts to dealing with a digital tax audit. Preparing for a digital tax administra­tion, however, will entail costs to the taxpayer. In order to maximize the value of investing in tax technology, taxpayers must also consider an effective digital tax strategy — a strategy that is able to address the tax risks of the evolving business environmen­t, maximize the capabiliti­es of the available tools and underlying digital data, and provide confidence in the quality, accuracy and completene­ss of data submitted to the tax authoritie­s. In order for a business to properly evolve its tax function, it must therefore proactivel­y develop a digital tax strategy that is customized and best suited to the organizati­on.

This article is for general informatio­n only and is not a substitute for profession­al advice where the facts and circumstan­ces warrant. The views and opinion expressed above are those of the authors and do not necessaril­y represent the views of SGV & Co.

 ?? LEE CELSO R. VIVAS is a Tax Partner of SGV & Co. ??
LEE CELSO R. VIVAS is a Tax Partner of SGV & Co.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines