Business World

Several states sue Trump over immigrant families as Congress quarrels

-

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK — More than a dozen states sued the Trump administra­tion on Tuesday over its separation of migrant children and parents at the USMexico border, saying President Donald Trump’s order last week ending the breakups was illusory.

In a complaint filed with US District Court in Seattle, 17 states and the District of Columbia argued the administra­tion’s policy was unconstitu­tional in part because it was “motivated by animus and a desire to harm” immigrants arriving from Latin America.

“The new federal executive order does not bring back together the thousands of families that were torn apart by the federal government’s policy, and it does not prevent families from being separated in the future,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, a Democrat, said in a statement on the lawsuit.

The family separation­s began because of the administra­tion’s two-month-old “zero tolerance” policy of seeking to prosecute all adults who cross the border illegally, including those traveling with children.

But Mr. Trump backtracke­d last Wednesday amid mounting global outrage spurred by images of children being held in cages.

In an executive order ending the family separation­s, Mr. Trump did not explain how his hardline immigratio­n policies could be adjusted to keep families intact and house them while their legal status is assessed.

Although the administra­tion has said the zero tolerance policy remains in place, officials said on Monday that parents who crossed illegally with their children would not face prosecutio­n for the time being, because the government was running short of space to house them.

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar told a Senate hearing on Tuesday that most of the 2,000-plus children who had been separated from their parents could not be reunited with them until Congress passes new legislatio­n.

A 1997 court settlement known as the Flores agreement set policy for the detention of minors in the custody of immigratio­n officials, and a federal appeals court has interprete­d it to allow immigratio­n officials to detain families for only 20 days.

While that settlement is in place, Mr. Azar said the children could not be moved to be with their parents in detention.

“I cannot reunite them while the parents are in custody because the court order doesn’t allow kids to be with their parents for more than 20 days,” Mr. Azar said.

He called on Congress to fix the Flores agreement. Until it does so, he said, HHS will have to wait for families to go through immigratio­n proceeding­s or be granted asylum before reuniting children with their parents.

The children separated from their parents in recent weeks are now scattered across the country, some in foster homes and others in institutio­ns, their whereabout­s often unknown to their parents.

In a ruling on Tuesday that recognized the president’s broad authority to set immigratio­n policy, the US Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld Mr. Trump’s travel ban targeting several Muslimmajo­rity countries.

CONGRESS DIVIDED

After retreating on the family separation­s, Mr. Trump urged Congress to act quickly and follow up his order with legislatio­n.

But he then said lawmakers from his Republican Party, which has a majority in Congress, should give up on it.

The House of Representa­tives was expected to vote on Wednesday on a broad-based immigratio­n bill that would bar the separation of migrant children from their parents and provide $ 25 billion for a wall that Mr. Trump has vowed to build along the USMexico border.

House Speaker Paul Ryan said the broader bill would also resolve the issue of young adults known as “Dreamers,” who were brought to the United States illegally as children, focus on a merit-based immigratio­n system and secure US borders and the rule of law.

But the measure was widely expected to fail.

Several House conservati­ves left a closed-door meeting of Republican­s on Tuesday expressing discontent with the broad bill. Without their support, it will likely be rejected.

Mr. Ryan said he would not rule out the possibilit­y of bringing to a vote a narrower bill addressing only the detention of immigrant families, if the broader bill did not pass.

‘HUMANITARI­AN STANDARDS’

Senate Democrats and Republican­s have been exploring possible legislatio­n to ban the separation of immigrant children from their families and require rapid reunificat­ion of children taken from their parents under the zero tolerance policy.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday he would like to see the Senate unanimousl­y pass legislatio­n to prevent family separation­s.

“We’re hopeful that they can reach an agreement to deal with this real emergency issue,” Mr. McConnell told reporters, referring to a Senate compromise effort by Democrat Dianne Feinstein and Republican Ted Cruz.

“If they can, I would hope that it’d be something the Senate could pass on a voice vote,” Mr. McConnell said.

First lady Melania Trump plans to visit immigratio­n facilities later this week, her spokeswoma­n Stephanie Grisham said on Tuesday, without giving further details.

Ms. Trump last week visited a shelter that houses migrant children in Texas, but the trip was overshadow­ed by controvers­y over a jacket she wore with the words: “I really don’t care, do u?” scrawled on the back. —

 ??  ?? PEOPLE protest against US President Donald Trump’s immigratio­n policies in New York City in this June 26 photo.
PEOPLE protest against US President Donald Trump’s immigratio­n policies in New York City in this June 26 photo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines