Swedish law recognizes sex without consent as rape

STOCKHOLM — A tough new law that will recognize sex without explicit consent as rape comes into effect in Sweden on Sunday, after the country was rocked by the #MeToo movement denouncing sexual harassment and assault. The law stipulates that a person has committed rape if they have been part of a sexual act in which the other person has not participated “freely.” Rape had previously been defined as a sexual act carried out with the use of violence or threat. Now for someone to face rape charges, “it is no longer necessary that violence or threats were applied, or that the aggressor took advantage of the victim’s particularly vulnerable situation,” according to the government. The law says that courts will need to pay particular attention to whether consent was expressed with words, gestures, or in another manner, and judges will have to rule on the issue. Judge Anna Hannell, who helped create the law, said there was “absolutely no requirement to formally say ‘yes,’ to hit a button in an app or anything else of the same type. Simply participating physically is a sign of consent,” she told Swedish news agency TT. More than 7,000 rapes were reported in Sweden last year, a 10% increase compared to 2016, latest official figures show. Rape is punishable by up to six years in prison, with a maximum penalty of 10 years if the victim is a minor. The #MeToo campaign exposing sexual misconduct, which began with the series of allegations against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, has shaken up nearly every sector in Sweden, one of the most gender-equal countries in the world. More than 10,000 women in Sweden — including actresses, journalists, lawyers, musicians, doctors and construction workers — have spoken up and campaigned against harassment. The law was passed in May backed by the ruling coalition of Social Democrats and the Green Party. However, it has drawn criticism from several quarters including the Swedish lawyers’ association and the national law council. Opponents say the law will force judges to make arbitrary decisions on whether or not there was consent. —