Business World

How are online merchants and intermedia­ries taxed?

- MAILYN P. CONSIGNADO is a Senior Associate at SGV – Financial Services Tax.

Innovation­s brought about by informatio­n and communicat­ion technology have dramatical­ly changed how people behave and go about their daily tasks. As the number of computerli­terate, digital individual­s increases, the easier it becomes to exchange informatio­n and facilitate remote transactio­ns.

Conducting business has also become more convenient. Responding to clients’ inquiries and delivering goods and services are now more efficient for both buyers and sellers. Thanks to the continuous developmen­t of innovative, disruptive e-commerce technology, the Internet has transforme­d into an infinite marketplac­e where everything and anything can be bought and sold.

In the Philippine­s, a joint report by Globe Telecom and online news portal Rappler revealed that the penetratio­n rate of mobile Internet is growing at 150% every year, with average users spending 3.2 hours on mobile Internet, and 5.2 hours on desktops and tablets.

The same report noted that five out of 10 Filipinos recently bought something from the Internet, including games, music, apps, services, and physical goods.

Like-minded entreprene­urs have welcomed this digital phenomenon with open arms, judging from the popularity of e-commerce websites such as Lazada, Zalora, and Shoppee, which have millions of pesos in sales.

Since these are new business platforms that were not even present a few decades ago, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) has seen fit to remind the transactin­g parties of their tax obligation­s while keeping in mind the shared interests of the government, that is, to ensure the proper collection of taxes from profits gained in the conduct of online business transactio­ns. These policies are intended to complement the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000, otherwise known as Republic Act 8792.

On Aug. 5, 2013, the BIR issued Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 055-13, which further reiterated the taxpayers’ obligation­s in relation to online business transactio­ns. The regulation enumerated the responsibi­lities of online merchant and online intermedia­ries on tax compliance, to ensure that proper taxes are remitted to the government and all the transactio­ns using the internet are properly receipted.

The regulation views an “online merchant” as an e-commerce business owner that owns a website and sells his own products and services, appearing like a virtual store. Likewise, it also defined “online intermedia­ries” as third parties that offer intermedia­tion services between two trading parties. The intermedia­ry acts as a conduit for goods or services offered by a supplier to a consumer, for which it receives commission.

For online merchants, the tax obligation is straightfo­rward. Online merchants are basically covered by existing tax regulation­s, as an entity directly selling goods or services. Specifical­ly, online merchants are required to: register the business at the Revenue District Office (RDO); secure Authority to Print invoices/receipts, which may either be manual or computeriz­ed accounting system; issue registered invoices/receipts for every sales transactio­n; withhold required creditable withholdin­g tax (CWT)/expanded withholdin­g tax (EWT) and remit tax to the BIR; file applicable tax returns or other reports required for compliance and pay correct taxes; and keep books of account as required by law, making them available anytime for inspection and verificati­on by the BIR for compliance with tax rules.

However, complicati­ons arise when the online platform provider is not the actual merchant. RMC 055-13 foresaw this, and stipulated no exceptions for filing tax for e-commerce platforms, even if online intermedia­ries are given different requiremen­ts. Their tax responsibi­lities may differ as to whether they actually act as an agent of the merchant, or are considered the merchant itself.

The instances when the online intermedia­ry is considered the actual merchant itself are:

1) When consumers buy goods or services from an intermedia­ry service provider who controls such collection of buyers’ payments, and thereafter receives commission from the merchant/ retailer, and;

2) When the intermedia­ry markets multiple products for its own account.

According to RMC 055-13, an Online Intermedia­ry which acts as an agent of the merchant is obligated to:

a. Issue the merchant’s acknowledg­ement receipt (for goods)/official receipt [OR] (for services) for the buyer to claim the goods/service (in this case, the merchant acting as the principal shall assign a number of pads of such receipts to the intermedia­ry/agent);

b. Ensure the merchant delivers the goods to the buyer with an accompanyi­ng invoice or merchant performs the purchased service, and;

c. Issue an OR to the merchant for the full amount of the agreed commission, and reflecting therein the amount withheld by the merchant.

However, if the Online Intermedia­ry controls the collection­s/payments of buyers or markets products/services for its own account, and is therefore considered the retailer/merchant for the purpose of taxation, it is required to:

a. Issue the invoice/OR for the full amount of the sale to the buyer - if paid through a bank, or issue electronic­ally the invoice/OR for the full amount of the sale to the buyer -if paid by credit card;

b. Issue the acknowledg­ment receipt to the bank (or through the credit card company) for the amount received;

c. Remit the amount to the merchant retailer net of intermedia­ry’s agreed mark-up/commission (include in the said remittance to merchant/retailer the 10% EWT) – if paid through a bank, or pay the commission of the credit card company net of the 10% EWT and remit the balance to the merchant retailer net of intermedia­ry’s agreed mark-up/commission – if paid by credit card.

Note that this regulation explicitly subjects the income payments made to online intermedia­ries to 10% EWT. Interestin­gly, it effectivel­y amends RR 2-98, by specifying the applicable EWT rate for commission­s or service fees paid to online intermedia­ries.

Without this regulation, the income payments to online intermedia­ries may be subjected to 2% EWT which is the rate imposed on contractor­s engaged in other computer-related activities under RR 2-98.

Given the above requiremen­ts of RMC 055-13, entities offering intermedia­ry services, and those partnering with them, should always take into considerat­ion the proper classifica­tion of online intermedia­ries for taxation purposes in order to comply with the tax rules.

Both RA 8792 and RMC 055-13 were considered ahead of their time when they were enacted/issued. However, in the last five years, the e-commerce community has attracted even more budding entreprene­urs to the market, and virtual shopping is still evolving. As technologi­cal innovation­s continue, let us remain hopeful that taxing authoritie­s will remain on top with timely and updated revenue regulation­s.

This article is for general informatio­n only and is not a substitute for profession­al advice where the facts and circumstan­ces warrant. The views and opinion expressed above are those of the author and do not necessaril­y represent the views

of SGV & Co.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines