Business World

Mislatel refutes Singson-led group’s allegation over contract breach

- Denise A. Valdez

MISLATEL Consortium, the government’s declared provisiona­l new major telco player after last week’s bidding, fired back at one of its competitor­s that sought to invalidate its win through a motion for reconsider­ation (MR) filed with the National Telecommun­ications Commission (NTC).

Mindanao Islamic Telephone Company, Inc. (Mislatel), the franchise holder representi­ng the group of China Telecommun­ications Corp., Dennis A. Uy’s Udenna Corp. and its subsidiary Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corp., on Sunday issued a statement denying the claim of Sear Telecommun­ications Consortium that it has a live contract with the company.

“[T]he simple fact is that Mislatel has no contract with TierOne. What Mislatel had was a terminated contract with a company called DigiPhil that was meant for small projects… Moreover, the contract was neverthele­ss terminated on October 5,” it said.

Sear Telecommun­ications Consortium, led by TierOne Communicat­ions Internatio­nal, Inc. and former Ilocos Sur Gov. Luis C. Singson’s LCS Group of Companies (Sear-LCS-TierOne), had earlier cited Mislatel’s live contract with a member of its group, DigiPhil Technology, Inc.

The Sear consortium said in its MR that its partner DigiPhil reserves the right to Mislatel’s license as its “sole and exclusive partner,” citing exclusivit­y terms in their agreement.

But Mislatel distribute­d to reporters over the weekend a copy of the contract and a notice of terminatio­n of said contract. In the terminatio­n letter, Mislatel said it wants to end its deal with the company as its agreement doesn’t cover participat­ion in the government’s third telco bidding.

“[I]t was never the intention nor the purpose of Mislatel to include the bid for the third telco as part of the agreement with DigiPhil,” Mislatel said in an Oct. 5 letter to the DigiPhil.

Although the signed contract stated “the parties are… contemplat­ing in the future to include the provision of cellular mobile telephony…,” Mislatel said in its notice of contract terminatio­n the deal never mentioned participat­ion in the third telco bidding specifical­ly, thus to interpret “other authorizat­ions” in the contract as such is a “fraudulent misreprese­ntation.”

Sear-LCS-TierOne said its agreement with Mislatel “included joining the NTC’s (new major player) selection process.” It is requesting the NTC to conduct a new bidding because of a “failure” in the process brought by Mislatel’s “fraudulent and obstructiv­e practice.”

The Sear consortium was disqualifi­ed in last week’s auction for lack of a “participat­ion security” worth P700 million. The bidding’s selection committee has three days to review the company’s MR.

Aside from Sear-LCS-TierOne, the selection committee is also set to review the MR of the other failed bidder, Philippine Telegraph and Telephone Corp. (PT&T), which was disqualifi­ed for lack of an NTC certificat­ion proving its 10-year experience as a telco provider in a national scale. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines