US lawmakers criticize Saudi Arabia, ask about weapons restrictions

WASHINGTON — The chairman of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee said on Wednesday he was troubled by a report that Saudi Arabia transferred weapons to extremist groups in Yemen and questioned whether Congress should consider more restrictions on weapons sales to the Saudi-led coalition.

Later on Wednesday, the committee voted 25 to 17, along party lines, in favor of a war powers resolution that would prevent the US military from providing any support to the Saudis and other countries waging war on Iranbacked Houthi rebels in Yemen’s civil war.

CNN reported on Monday that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, its main partner in the coalition, have transferred US-made weapons to al Qaedalinked fighters and other groups and that some of the weapons also made their way into the hands of Iranian-backed rebels, exposing sensitive technology to Iran.

“These reports are very troubling and the Trump administration must investigate further and work to prevent this from happening again,” Democratic Representative Eliot Engel, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said at a hearing.

“Should Congress pursue greater restrictions on offensive weapons to the Saudi coalition?” asked Mr. Engel, who as chairman has the right to review and put “holds” on major foreign weapons sales.

The State department said it was investigating the allegations. “We are aware of these reports and seeking additional information,” a department official said, adding that all such reports are taken seriously.

Critical comments from Mr. Engel and other committee members were only the latest recent expressions of frustration with Saudi Arabia from US lawmakers. Members of Congress have been angered by steep civilian casualties in Yemen, human rights abuses and the killing of Saudi journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, a US resident, at a Saudi consulate in Turkey in October.

Late last year, lawmakers introduced various pieces of legislation seeking to put tighter controls on US dealings with Riyadh, including clamping down on weapons sales, barring military cooperation with the Saudiled coalition and calls for human rights sanctions.

President Donald Trump’s administration opposed many of the bills, calling the Saudis important regional partners and praising weapons sales as an important source of US jobs.

None of those bills became law, but Mr. Engel said the committee would continue to press for a response to casualties in Yemen, Mr. Khashoggi’s killing and the imprisonment of women’s rights activities. “It can no longer be business as usual. We need to push for a real change in Saudi behavior,” he said.

Representative Michael McCaul, the panel’s top Republican, called Mr. Khashoggi’s murder “a major setback” in the US-Saudi relationship and deplored civilian casualties in Yemen.

Mr. McCaul, however, opposed the war powers resolution seeking to bar US military support for the Saudi-led coalition, saying it “could disrupt US security cooperation with partners around the world.” To go into effect, the war powers resolution must pass the full House of Representatives and the Senate, where Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans hold a slim majority, and be signed into law by Mr. Trump. If Mr. Trump declined to sign the resolution, the measure would have to garner the two-thirds majority support in both the House and Senate needed to overcome a presidential veto. —