Business World

Corporate Governance Paradigm under the Corporatio­n Code of the Philippine­s

- Board compositio­n must be of optimum size

The Corporatio­n Code contains its own set of “corporate governance (CG) principles,” which can be summarized into the following general statements:

a. The size and compositio­n of the Board of Directors can only be based on provisions contained in the Articles of Incorporat­ion or the By-Laws.

b. Other than in those cases specifical­ly provided by law, any qualificat­ion or disqualifi­cation pertaining to the members of the Board of Direc

tors shall be valid only when expressly provided in the articles or by-laws.

c. Boards of Directors

have no power by mere exercise of their Business Judgment, to provide for their own qualificat­ions and disqualifi­cations.

d. Outside of specific statutory empowermen­t, the power to elect, compensate, discipline, and remove any member of the Board of Directors is vested with the stockholde­rs.

Section 14(6) of the Corpora- chance of electing their nominees into the Board. It embodies the “CG principle” that the Board of Directors of every stock corporatio­n, although it speaks and decides through the vote of the majority of its members, should have varied representa­tion that allows the airing of the concerns and interests of the minority stockholde­rs. The mandatory cumulative voting system in the election of the members of the Boards of Directors of companies under the Corporatio­n Code therefore adheres to the current CG principle of capital stock. In essence, outside of statutory provisions on the matter, the compositio­n of the Board of Directors and the qualificat­ions and disqualifi­cations of its members are

governed by existing provisions in the articles of incorporat­ion and by-laws, and cannot be changed simply by a formal resolution of the Board of Di

rectors in the exercise of their

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines