Business World

US House Democrats target Trump-Putin talks, obstructio­n

-

WASHINGTON — Democrats in the US Congress unleashed an unexpected­ly sweeping series of demands in their investigat­ions of President Donald Trump on Monday, seeking informatio­n about his communicat­ions with Russian President Vladimir Putin and documents from 81 sources in an obstructio­n probe.

The heads of the House of Representa­tives Intelligen­ce, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees wrote to the White House and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo seeking documents and interviews with personnel about Mr. Trump’s conversati­ons with Mr. Putin.

The lawmakers expressed concern about media reports that Mr. Trump seized notes on at least one meeting with the Russian leader and tried to destroy records about those talks.

“These allegation­s, if true, raise profound national security, counterint­elligence, and foreign policy concerns, especially in light of Russia’s ongoing active measures campaign to improperly influence American elections,” Chairmen Adam Schiff, Elliot Engel and Elijah Cummings wrote in their letter.

The White House pushed back against their demands, with a spokesman saying it was within the president’s constituti­onal authority to have “candid one-on-one conversati­ons with foreign heads of state.”

“The president may choose to share, or not share the contents of those conversati­ons publicly as such discussion­s — like all diplomatic discussion­s — are often sensitive in nature,” the spokesman said on condition of anonymity, urging the panels to respect Mr. Trump’s authority to conduct foreign policy.

The request for informatio­n about communicat­ions with Mr. Putin followed the powerful House Judiciary Committee’s demand for documents from a who’s who of Mr. Trump’s turbulent world, targeting 81 people, government agencies and other groups in a probe into possible obstructio­n of justice or abuse of power.

The Republican president faces investigat­ions from several congressio­nal committees, as well as the 22-month-long federal special counsel probe into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 presidenti­al election and whether the Mr. Trump campaign worked with Moscow to sway the outcome.

When they took control of the House in January, Democrats promised investigat­ions on multiple fronts involving Mr. Trump, saying their Republican counterpar­ts had ignored red flags coming out of the White House.

The Judiciary Committee listed Mr. Trump family members, current and former business employees, Republican campaign staffers and former White House aides, as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion (FBI), White House and WikiLeaks were listed as recipients of documents requests.

The panel also named the president’s sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, White House aide and Mr. Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, Trump Organizati­on Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselber­g, former US attorney general Jeff Sessions and former White House counsel Don McGahn.

“We have seen the damage done to our democratic institutio­ns in the two years that the Congress refused to conduct responsibl­e oversight,” said US Representa­tive Jerrold Nadler, Judiciary Committee chairman. “Congress must provide a check on abuses of power.”

At the White House, Mr. Trump was asked if he would cooperate with Mr. Nadler’s probe. “I cooperate all the time with everybody,” he said before adding: “You know the beautiful thing? No collusion. It’s all a hoax… It’s a political hoax.”

A committee lawyer told reporters the immediate aim is to amass a large trove of evidence to guide the investigat­ion and help decide which witnesses to approach. The panel is prepared to use its subpoena power if needed, the lawyer said.

Among the committee’s aims is determinin­g whether Mr. Trump obstructed justice by ousting perceived enemies at the Justice Department, such as former FBI Director James Comey, and abused his presidenti­al power by possibly offering pardons or tampering with witnesses.

Mr. Comey was leading an investigat­ion into Russian activities in the 2016 US presidenti­al election and possible collusion with Mr. Trump’s campaign when the president fired him in May 2017.

The investigat­ion was subsequent­ly taken over by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is expected to end his investigat­ion and report his findings in coming weeks.

The Judiciary Committee is also probing a discussion a lawyer for former Trump attorney Michael Cohen had with Mr. Trump’s lawyers about the possibilit­y of a pardon for Mr. Cohen, the Wall

Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the discussion­s.

The discussion happened in the weeks after FBI agents raided Mr. Cohen’s home, office and hotel room, the Journal reported. The president’s lawyers dismissed the idea of a pardon at the time, the newspaper said. Mr. Cohen later pleaded guilty to tax evasion, bank fraud, lying to Congress and campaign finance violations.

The Judiciary Committee is looking at whether Mr. Trump has used the White House for personal enrichment in violation of the Constituti­on’s emoluments clause. Representa­tives for the White House and Justice Department said the requests are being reviewed.

Republican­s in Congress accuse Democrats of pursuing an impeachmen­t agenda against Mr. Trump as part of a political strategy to reclaim the White House in the 2020 election.

Democrats say talk of impeachmen­t is premature. They say the first step is to initiate proper investigat­ions, which were missing in the first two years of Mr. Trump’s presidency, when his fellow Republican­s controlled the House of Representa­tives. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines