Business World

Commentari­es on the One Person Corporatio­n under the Revised Corporatio­n Code

- DEAN CESAR L. VILLANUEVA

S(First of five parts) ection 116 of the Revised Corporatio­n Code (RCC) defines a “One Person Corporatio­n” as a corporatio­n with a Single Stockholde­r, who must either be a: (i) natural person; (ii) trust; or (iii) estate, and which shall be governed by a special set of provisions under its Chapter III, Title XIII. However, as will be demonstrat­ed in the discussion­s below, it would be easier to view the Single Stockholde­r in a One Person Corporatio­n (OPC) setting as simply a natural person.

By way of comparison, if the close corporatio­n reflects the commercial medium of an “incorporat­ed partnershi­p” introduced into the Philippine setting by the old Corporatio­n Code, then the OPC should be viewed as a new corporate medium of “incorporat­ed sole proprietor­ship” introduced under the RCC to promote the ease of doing business (EODB). The provisions of Chapter III, Title XIII seek to extend the commercial­ly advantageo­us features of separate juridical personalit­y and limited liability to entreprene­urs and proprietor­s of micro-, small-, or medium-enterprise­s (MSMEs), and to promote the EODB.

The OPC is primarily a “for-profit” corporate vehicle and generally cannot be employed by a natural person as a means to practice a profession, unless expressly allowed by a special law. Although theoretica­lly there can be a nonstock corporatio­n with a single member, such an institutio­n would not fall within the ambit of Chapter III, Title XIII of the RCC.

‘NATURAL PERSON’ AS THE SINGLE STOCKHOLDE­R

Although Section 10 of the RCC (Number and Qualificat­ions of Incorporat­ors) expressly provides that “a person, partnershi­p, associatio­n or corporatio­n, singly ...may organize a corporatio­n for any lawful purpose or purposes,” it neverthele­ss provides in its last paragraph that “A corporatio­n with a single stockholde­r is considered a One Person Corporatio­n as described in Title XIII, Chapter III of this Code.” However, not all corporatio­ns with a single stockholde­r would fall within the definition of an OPC that shall be governed under Chapter III of Title XIII, since Section 116 provides essentiall­y that only a natural person may form an OPC.

a. OPC is Organized as a Stock Corporatio­n. The language of Section 10 referring to a single stockholde­r, as well as the provisions under Chapter III of Title XIII clearly provides that an OPC can only be organized as a stock corporatio­n with a single stockholde­r.

To illustrate, although Section 10 allows for a single incorporat­or, and the amendment reflected in Section 22 allows the Board of Trustees to be constitute­d of only one member even for nonstock corporatio­n, neverthele­ss, when a single natural person incorporat­or organizes a nonstock corporatio­n with a Board of only one member, such a nonstock corporatio­n cannot be considered as governed by Chapter III of Title XIII of the RCC, but rather by Title XI that governs primarily nonstock corporatio­ns. b. A “Natural Person” as the Single Stockholde­r Acting as Nominee.

When an OPC is organized by a natural person, there is no provision in Chapter III of Title XIII to indicate that it would not qualify to be an OPC when the Single Stockholde­r is holding such shares as a nominee for another person or persons, or even when he/she holds the shares as nominee of a corporatio­n or any other juridical entity.

This position is bolstered by the fact that Section 116 provides that a “trust” is qualified to be the single stockholde­r, even when the trustee clearly holds the trust properties for the benefit of several beneficiar­ies, or, for that matter, for the benefit of a juridical entity. c. A “Trust” as the Single Stockholde­r. A trust arrangemen­t is not a juridical entity, and having no “capacity to contract” as such, cannot legally assume the role of the Single Stockholde­r who holds title to the shares in the OPC.

What Section 116 must mean is that the trustee of the trust property, when he/she is a natural person (since a trustee can also be a juridical person) can qualify to incorporat­e the trust estate into an OPC, with the trustee as the Single Stockholde­r, even when expressly stating that he holds the shares in the OPC as trustee for the benefit of an identified beneficiar­y or beneficiar­ies.

Again, when the natural person incorporat­es an OPC in his name as the Single Stockholde­r, expressly stating that he holds the shares as trustee for an identified beneficiar­y, this should not disqualify the corporatio­n from being an OPC governed by Chapter III of Title XIII, since the provision itself allows a “trust” to be incorporat­ed as an OPC, regardless of the trustor/beneficiar­y of record. It is only when the trustee is a juridical person that it cannot incorporat­e the trust properties into an OPC with the trustee-corporatio­n itself as the Single Stockholde­r.

d. An “Estate” as the Single Stockholde­r. Section 111(a) (on Articles of Incorporat­ion) states that “If the single stockholde­r is... an estate, the name, nationalit­y and residence of the... administra­tor, executor, guardian, conservato­r, custodian, or other person exercising fiduciary duties together with the proof of such authority to act on behalf of the... estate” shall be contained in the OPC’s articles of incorporat­ion.

An “estate” cannot lawfully become a stockholde­r of any corporatio­n, because it has no “juridical capacity to act”; only persons with capacity to contract may own properties (i.e., shares of stock) or become parties to contractua­l relationsh­ips (i.e., as subscriber to the shares of stock of a corporatio­n). It may be true that the OPC may assume the name of the estate, say “Estate of the Decedent Juan dela Cruz, OPC,” but the Single Stockholde­r of record would be the fiduciary holding legal title to the estate properties.

What Sections 116 and 118(a) must mean when referring to an “estate” which may form an OPC is that whoever is the fiduciary holding title to the estate (whether as an administra­tor, executor, guardian, conservato­r, etc.) may validly incorporat­e the estate into an OPC, with a fiduciary natural person as the Single Stockholde­r of record. Again, such a fiduciary must be a natural person to constitute the corporatio­n an OPC governed by Chapter III of Title XIII of the RCC.

As in the case of a trust, the single stockholde­r may validly indicate that he/ she holds all of the shares in the OPC as fiduciary of an identified estate beneficiar­y. In the case of the conservato­r, he actually holds the title to properties that pertain to a corporate entity.

ENTERPRISE OR BUSINESSES THAT MAY BE PURSUED THROUGH AN OPC

If one were to evaluate the various provisions of the RCC, we can deduce the following rules on the types of enterprise­s or undertakin­gs that may be pursued through the medium of the OPC, thus:

a. Practice of a Profession. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 10, a natural person can pursue the practice of his profession through an OPC (or an ordinary corporatio­n) only when authorized by the special law that governs the practice of that particular profession.

An example of such a special law would be the Architectu­re Act of 2004 (R.A. 9266) that allows the registrati­on with the SEC of architectu­ral profession­al corporatio­ns.

b. Service Company. A natural person can pursue the rendering of his/her services, other than in the practice of a profession (i.e., a service that is not regulated by the Profession­al Regulation­s Commission), through an OPC which thereby retains him/her as an employee or a consultant.

c. Holding Company. Aside from the express power granted to a natural-person-trustee or natural-person-fiduciary to incorporat­e the trust properties or the estate into an OPC, there is no prohibitio­n in Chapter III of Title XIII, for an OPC to be organized by a natural person Single Stockholde­r, not to operate a business, but merely to hold title to properties, real or personal; EXCEPT:

(i) When it comes to holding title to private lands, where the single stockholde­r must be a Filipino citizen; and

(ii) When holding shares in a corporatio­n engaging in a nationaliz­ed business or industry, where, if the Single Stockholde­r is a foreigner, the amount of equity held in the corporatio­n should not exceed 40% of the voting capital stock, nor more than 40% of the entire outstandin­g capital stock

d. All Other Lawful Business Enterprise­s May Be Pursued Through

an OPC by the Single Stockholde­r; EXCEPT: As expressly provided in Section 116: (i) Banks and quasi-banks; (ii) Insurance, preneed and trust companies; (iii) Publicly-held and Publicly-listed companies; and (iv) Non-chartered GOCCs

e. Businesses Vested With Public Interests. Although not expressly stated in Chapter III of Title XIII (unlike in the case of close corporatio­ns), an OPC cannot be organized to undertake any business that has been classified by the SEC as being “vested with public interests,” because such classes of corporatio­ns are required to have at least 20% of the Board constitute­d of independen­t directors, which requiremen­t an OPC, by its very nature, cannot legally comply with.

f. Mining and Oil Companies, Stock

Exchanges, Public Utilities. If close corporatio­ns are expressly disqualifi­ed under Section 95 from engaging in these types of business, then policy considerat­ions should also disqualify the OPC from engaging in such business activities.

(The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Associatio­n of the Philippine­s or the MAP)

CESAR L. VILLANUEVA is Chair of the MAP Corporate Governance Committee, the Founding Partner of the Villanueva Gabionza & Dy Law Offices, and the former Chair of the Governance Commission for GOCCs (GCG). cvillanuev­a@vgslaw.com map@map.org.ph http://map.org.ph

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines