Business World

Cost of doing business, navigating internatio­nal rules hindering wider Philippine utilizatio­n of trade deals

- By Justine Irish D. Tabile Reporter

EXPORTERS lack the knowledge to tap trade agreements and face a higher cost of doing business in the Philippine­s, rendering their products uncompetit­ive relative to other countries’ exports, a business group said.

The Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry said cost-of-doingbusin­ess issues center on high power and logistics costs.

“The cost of doing business is still quite high (here) compared to the other countries… These are some of the issues that the government has to address for us to really gain full benefit from (taking advantage of) free trade agreements (FTAs),” PCCI President George T. Barcelon told BusinessWo­rld by phone.

Mr. Barcelon said that aside from incentives, the Philippine­s must seek to be a competitiv­e market as it is yet to see strong, sustained inflows of foreign direct investment (FDIs).

“It is top of mind in our meeting with the Anti-Red Tape Authority and foreign chambers that there are these issues to be addressed,” he said.

“As of now, we are not seeing any real good inflow of FDIs as investment­s are still headed towards Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. This is something that needs work,” he added.

Net inflows of FDI slumped to their lowest level in over three years, amounting to $422 million in September. This was 42.2% lower year on year and down by 46.5% from a month prior.

This brought the FDI net inflows to $5.9 billion in the first nine months of the year, representi­ng a 15.9% decline from a year earlier. Mr. Barcelon said that the Philippine­s must upskill its workers to move its products higher up the value ladder.

“Once we have increased to a higher value, be it agricultur­al or electronic products… the other thing that I think the government must be aware is the cost of compliance and permits,” he said.

He said that the added costs do not align with the government’s target of rightsizin­g the bureaucrac­y.

“What businesses see is that there is more bureaucrac­y, and bureaucrac­y sometimes can be interprete­d as the flip side of corruption,” he added.

Last year, the Philippine­s improved its ranking on the global corruption index compiled by Transparen­cy Internatio­nal. It placed 116th out of 180 countries in the 2022 Corruption Perception­s Index, a spot higher than its worst-ever showing of 117th place in 2021.

Despite the improvemen­t in ranking, the Philippine score was 33, its lowest ever in the index and below the global average of 43 and the Asia-Pacific average of 45.

TRADE DEALS

Trade and Industry Undersecre­tary Allan B. Gepty said some investment must be made in navigating the preferenti­al arrangemen­ts and their compliance rules to be in a position to access trade agreements.

“There are still many businesses who are not that aware of these preferenti­al arrangemen­ts, including compliance procedures,” Mr. Gepty said in a Viber message.

“The continuing program is for advocacy and education so that exporters can avail of the preferenti­al arrangemen­ts and other businesses can be encouraged to export or even do business in other countries,” he added.

Mr. Gepty said the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) plans to sustain its campaign to inform and educate stakeholde­rs on the benefits of FTAs such as the Regional Comprehens­ive Economic Partnershi­p (RCEP) and other preferenti­al agreements such as the European Union’s (EU) Generalise­d Scheme of Preference­s Plus (GSP+).

The Philippine­s has been a beneficiar­y of the GSP+, a special trade scheme for vulnerable low- and lower-middle-income countries, since 2014. GSP+ grants zero duties on 6,274 Philippine products.

The current arrangemen­t was set to expire by the end of 2023. However, the Council of EU Member States and the European Parliament amended the GSP scheme to extend it to 2027.

Under the current scheme, eligible countries, such as the Philippine­s, will have to comply with 27 internatio­nal convention­s on human rights, labor rights, climate action, and good governance.

The Philippine­s was threatened with the loss of its GSP+ status during the Duterte administra­tion due to European concern over extrajudic­ial killings and alleged human rights violations.

The Duterte administra­tion’s “war on drugs” was condemned by the European Parliament in a resolution passed in February 2022, which asked the country to act on human rights abuses.

On the other hand, RCEP, the world’s biggest FTA involving a third of the global economy, counts among its members Associatio­n of Southeast Asian Nations, Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea.

The deal aims to increase trade among RCEP participan­ts by allowing minimal to zero restrictio­ns on shipment volumes, tariffs, and import taxes.

The Philippine­s was the last participat­ing country to ratify the FTA on June 2, more than two and a half years since the participat­ing countries concluded the deal in November 2020.

Mr. Gepty said that the late ratificati­on is one of the reasons why it is still too early to assess RCEP utilizatio­n in the Philippine­s.

“Since its implementa­tion in the Philippine­s only started in June, it would still be too early to gather and process data. We are coordinati­ng with concerned agencies to gather relevant data for purposes of monitoring,” he said.

Mr. Barcelon added: “RCEP was just ratified in the middle of the year, so it will take some time to really get the benefits from it.”

He said that most RCEP countries are already Philippine trading partners.

“Some of the benefits that I would see are for our agricultur­al sector to be able to expand their market in Japan, among others,” he added, citing the benefits of the lowered tariffs for Philippine produce under RCEP.

Tereso O. Panga, director-general of the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA), said there has been an increase in investment approvals from some RCEP countries.

“There has been a marked increase in our ecozone investment approvals this year from Australia and China, countries we consider in PEZA as non-traditiona­l sources of economic zone (ecozone) FDI and exports,” Mr. Panga said in a Viber message.

“Clearly, we can attribute this trade and investment market diversific­ation to the country’s recent accession to RCEP,” he added.

PEZA reported that approved investment­s from Australia more than doubled to P772.82

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines