Business World

Risk and resilience in 2024

- WILSON P. TAN WILSON P. TAN is the country managing partner of SGV & Co.

As we start a new year while still grappling with the challenges left behind by the pandemic, organizati­ons are more cognizant of the increasing number of risks in the global market. The range of risks organizati­ons face is broad, intricate, and interconne­cted, from unpredicta­ble black swan events to more frequent and predictabl­e gray rhino events.

Black swan occurrence­s, which are highly unpredicta­ble, rare, and uncontroll­able, could potentiall­y have a catastroph­ic impact. Gray rhinos, on the other hand, are common, expected, and often have a large visible impact. It is crucial for boards to concentrat­e on the latter and integrate them more proactivel­y into their overall risk management strategy.

Beyond the typical risks related to finance, cybersecur­ity, reputation, regulation, and competitio­n, firms are increasing­ly pressured to handle risks associated with climate change, sustainabi­lity, supply chains, and geopolitic­s. This has led to a greater emphasis on governance and increased pressure on boards.

The EY Global Board Risk Survey 2023, which polled 500 board directors worldwide from companies earning over $1 billion, revealed that less than a quarter of the respondent­s are deemed highly resilient.

Highly resilient boards are selfassure­d and handle unexpected highimpact situations more effectivel­y. They display high effectiven­ess in aligning risk and business strategy. These boards are neither complacent nor unaware of potential gaps in their preparedne­ss and the evolving risk landscape. By concentrat­ing on certain key areas, boards can support their organizati­ons in prioritizi­ng resilience to more effectivel­y navigate the risk landscape.

PRIORITIZI­NG FUTURE AND SUBSTANTIA­L RISKS

Instead of merely bouncing back in recovery, enterprise resilience is more about adapting to risks. This emphasizes the importance of foreseeing substantia­l and emerging threats, preparing for them, and adjusting accordingl­y. The board and management need to effectivel­y perceive beyond immediate and apparent threats while allocating ample time to discuss market changes and trends.

Employing technologi­es such as Artificial Intelligen­ce (AI) and advanced analytics to predict the possibilit­y of black swan and gray rhino events can be beneficial. Implementi­ng quantitati­ve analysis in various situations can improve the board and management’s understand­ing of the company’s total risk exposure. It can also enhance their comprehens­ion of the viability of the current business strategy and model in the face of emerging risks and whether any adjustment­s are necessary.

PERSONNEL AND CORPORATE CULTURE

Companies face ongoing challenges, such as talent scarcity, continuous workforce transforma­tion, and managing the diverse needs of a multigener­ational workforce. The demand for flexible work arrangemen­ts and the growing challenge of aligning culture are becoming increasing­ly central to the personnel risks that organizati­ons encounter. With rapid technologi­cal changes, there is also a need to enable workforces with skills for the future.

The board has the responsibi­lity of supporting management to pinpoint and address the organizati­on’s critical talent needs. They should aim to establish an organizati­on that can adapt to fluctuatin­g expectatio­ns regarding culture, skillsets, and diversity, equality, and inclusion. By enhancing their knowledge, adaptabili­ty, and supervisio­n, the board can assist management in fostering a people-centric culture. It can also prompt management to cultivate leaders who can embody and sustain that culture.

ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE

The undeniable link between environmen­tal sustainabi­lity and corporate resilience means that companies face increased expectatio­ns from various stakeholde­rs, including investors. These stakeholde­rs are eager to learn about the company’s environmen­tal, social, and governance (ESG) performanc­e, as it compares to short-term profits and long-term investment­s in sustainabi­lity. Simultaneo­usly, authoritie­s are pushing for transparen­cy in sustainabi­lity disclosure­s, while new standards like the IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 from the Internatio­nal Sustainabi­lity Standards Board are reducing ambiguity in sustainabi­lity reports.

However, this presents a golden opportunit­y for companies to showcase their progress in sustainabi­lity performanc­e beyond mere compliance. Highly resilient boards are more conscious of significan­t sustainabi­lity issues and feel more at ease discussing them. This usually occurs when responsibi­lity for ESG risks is assigned, either to a leading committee or the entire board.

Boards can also earn the trust of investors by monitoring stringent procedures for gathering, managing, and disclosing reliable data to meet regulatory requiremen­ts. If discussion­s don’t lead to tangible action, the board should question management’s plans and dedication. To effectivel­y fulfill their roles, boards need to enhance their knowledge and expertise in sustainabi­lity.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH EMERGING TECHNOLOGI­ES

With advancemen­ts in generative AI, the emergence of the metaverse, and escalating cyber threats, the landscape of digital technology continues to evolve at an accelerate­d pace.

As enterprise­s increase their investment­s in digital technology, it is beneficial for boards and management to possess the knowledge required to identify possible technology opportunit­ies and risks. Their responsibi­lity is not to become tech-savvy — but to ensure their organizati­on is balancing the pace of adopting technology with the willingnes­s to take risks and caution. Innovation is necessary and while emerging technologi­es may be captivatin­g, they alone do not form a robust business plan and must be supported by well-founded business cases — especially in times of economic uncertaint­y.

To achieve this, the board should collaborat­e more closely with management, staying informed about significan­t investment­s in technology, digital transforma­tion, and cybersecur­ity. The board needs to encourage management to prioritize the education and skills enhancemen­t of their employees regarding digital matters and acknowledg­ing that the management of digital and technologi­cal risks is not solely the responsibi­lity of IT. Boards must gain hands-on experience with new technologi­es, welcoming innovation with purpose and careful understand­ing.

At the same time, innovative technology will not be able to progress organizati­onal growth without proper governance. Organizati­ons will need to be forward-thinking and proactive towards innovation, treading the fine line of being agile while also being ethical.

PRIORITIZI­NG RESILIENCE TO FACE RISKS

In response to a complex and interconne­cted risk landscape, boards need to better support their organizati­ons in prioritizi­ng resilience by focusing on several key areas. They can do so by building resilience, adapting, pivoting and preparing for gray rhino events.

In an increasing­ly complex world, organizati­ons must be better prepared for long-term challenges. The clarity from top-level management is non-negotiable for boards, as viewing things from a distance can offer a much clearer perspectiv­e of the bigger picture. This article is for general informatio­n only and is not a substitute for profession­al advice where the facts and circumstan­ces warrant. The views and opinions expressed above are those of the author and do not necessaril­y represent the views of SGV & Co.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines