Business World

PHL’s participat­ion in the BEPS Inclusive Framework may need reconsider­ing

- AMICUS CURIAE KAYE GEOZEN T. EBUENGAN KAYE GEOZEN T. EBUENGAN is an associate of the Tax department of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regala Cruz Law Offices. (02) 8830-8000 ktebuengan @accralaw.com

As digital technologi­es evolve and reshape the global economy, they pose increasing­ly complex taxation challenges. The Organisati­on for Economic Co-operation and Developmen­t (OECD) seeks to address these tax challenges through the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project, the Two-Pillar Approach: Pillar One (re-allocation of taxing rights) and Pillar Two (global minimum taxation). The TwoPillar Approach aims to ensure that profits are subject to taxation in locations where economic activities occur and value is created to promote equitable distributi­on of taxing rights among countries.

Under Pillar One, the largest Multinatio­nal Entities (MNEs) that have at least €20 billion in revenue are to re-allocate some taxing rights from their home countries to the markets where they have business activities and earn profits, regardless of whether firms there have a physical presence there. This will thus ensure a fairer distributi­on of profits and taxing rights among countries. The key elements of Pillar One can be grouped into three components:

• A new taxing right for market jurisdicti­ons over a share of residual profit calculated at a MNEs group (or segment) level (Amount A).

• A fixed return for defined baseline marketing and distributi­on activities taking place physically in a market jurisdicti­on, in line with the arm’s length principle (Amount B).

• Improved tax certainty processes to improve tax certainty through innovative dispute prevention and dispute resolution mechanisms (Tax certainty component).

On the other hand, Pillar Two introduces a Global Anti-Base Erosion Rule wherein a 15% global minimum effective tax rate (ETR) is imposed to MNEs with Group Revenues of over €750 million in each country in which they operate. It ensures that large internatio­nally operating businesses pay a minimum level of tax regardless of where they are headquarte­red or the jurisdicti­ons they operate in. Additional­ly, this rule is complement­ed by the Undertaxed Payments Rule, Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax, Subject to Tax rule, and Switch-over rule.

On Oct. 23, 2023, the Philippine­s joined the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS, among others, on allocation of taxation rights on cross-border/digital economy transactio­ns meeting certain establishe­d thresholds (Pillar One Commitment) by undertakin­g to work on and adopt appropriat­e legislatio­n consistent with the BEPS framework.

Notably, it is interestin­g how the Philippine­s’ participat­ion in the BEPS Inclusive Framework will affect registered business enterprise­s who could fall under defined MNEs under BEPS. In 2021, the Philippine government granted tax incentives pursuant to its passage of the CREATE (Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprise­s) Act. Registered Business Enterprise­s (RBEs) are offered tax incentives to attract foreign investment considerin­g that the Philippine­s is still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. The incentives include an income tax holiday (ITH), to be followed by a 10-year 5% special corporate income tax (SCIT) on gross income earned for export enterprise­s or enhanced deductions (ED) for both export and domestic market enterprise­s.

Thus, if the Philippine­s adopts the Pillar Two Commitment, the offered tax incentives through CREATE Act may, in a sense, lose its significan­ce for the affected RBEs. Under Pillar Two, affected RBEs will have to pay top-up taxes if their Effective Tax Rate falls below 15%. On the other hand, if this is implemente­d, Philippine­s will have its share of the allocation of the top-up taxes.

Certainly, while the objectives of the Two-Pillar Approach is laudable from a global perspectiv­e, it may be best that its implementa­tion be aligned with the country’s policy and objectives of encouragin­g foreign investment­s and trade in the Philippine­s, especially at this time when it is still recovering from the effects of the COVID -19 pandemic.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. This article is for general informatio­nal and educationa­l purposes only and not offered as and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines