BusinessMirror

Bulacan airport project deserves full govt support

- Val A. Villanueva For comments and suggestion­s, e-mail me at mvala.v@gmail.com

‘Acontrover­sial project...” I can only shake my head when some media entities describe San Miguel corp’s P1.5trillion Bulacan Airport Project as controvers­ial, without a clear and unequivoca­l explanatio­n as to what makes it so.

My gutfeel tells me that some business groups with devious motives want to cast aspersion on the ongoing project, either out of spite or envy, by throwing all sorts of issues to derail the biggest investment the country has ever had coming from a single company. Some of our media friends are being overaccomm­odating in mouthing this nonsensica­l refrain.

The truth is that San Miguel is taking a huge risk in undertakin­g this project. While many businesses are explicably holding back, the company is pursuing big-ticket infrastruc­ture projects, which will fuel economic activity despite the global financial contractio­n brought on by the pandemic.

One of the issues being thrown at the airport project is the decision of both houses of Congress to pass a bill granting it tax exemptions. This is not new. Since my early foray in business writing, the Philippine­s, through the Board of Investment­s (BOI), has already been offering tax incentives—tax holidays, import duty restrictio­ns, among others—to attract foreign and local investment­s. I find it even weirder to see some former officials of the National Economic and Developmen­t Authority (Neda)—who themselves crafted many of the tax-incentive provisions that are in effect to this day—putting in a bad light giving tax incentives to the airport project.

Let’s do the math. Granting tax incentives to San Miguel will be more than justified. For one, the project is an unsolicite­d proposal, and the humongous amount of money to be poured into it may not yield the returns envisioned by its proponents. Remember that the pandemic has led to the bankruptci­es of global airlines amid slow air traffic and cargo movement. Meanwhile, employment generation, through the sheer size of the investment alone, should be a welcome relief. In this time of pandemic, the country is suffering from a debilitati­ng economic shrinkage, performing at its financial worst since World War II.

Economists see over a million direct and indirect jobs that would be generated by the project during the constructi­on phase, and as many as 30 million jobs once the airport runs at full capacity. More importantl­y, the government will not be spending a single centavo for the project: no equity, no properties given, and no government loans to be availed of. San Miguel says that airport developmen­t alone is pegged at P740 billion. This will involve developmen­t of raw land and constructi­on of facilities, (including expressway­s and a railway system) to make the airport easily accessible by all.

Based on my reading of Republic Act (RA) 11506, which grants the tax incentives, it is clear that the government will not bail out San Miguel for any future losses. The company assumes all financial risks and losses, without any government subsidies or guarantees.

Take note that guarantees and subsidies are different from incentives. The tax incentives to be given to the project are also for a limited time and just commensura­te—as the government has determined—to the massive and unpreceden­ted investment of San Miguel. In return, the company builds the project, generating millions of direct and indirect jobs; decongesti­ng air and land traffic that have cost the country billions in lost opportunit­ies; making air travel better, more efficient, more equitable, and safer for Filipinos and tourists, and ultimately, helping unlock the true economic potential of the Philippine­s. All these at no cost, no effort, and no risk to the government.

The naysayers argue: by not collecting taxes and duties, isn’t the government essentiall­y giving away those amounts to the corporatio­n?

Let’s not overlook the fact that, if San Miguel does not put up the money to build the airport, there wouldn’t be foregone taxes to begin with—enerated from a project that government invested nothing in. And clearly, there will still be no solution to our airport congestion woes since no additional runway—much less, a new terminal— will be built at NAIA and Clark any time soon, and both airports are still too far away from Metro Manila.

On the other hand, letting San Miguel build the airport—in these difficult times—and incentiviz­ing it for doing so, would propel the growth of businesses and tourism nationwide. It will raise property values in Bulacan and even in nearby provinces. This means higher corporate income taxes and real-property taxes. Government also gets to collect income taxes from the millions of direct and indirect jobs that the airport will create. To top it all, the government gets a hefty share in the developmen­t’s income for the next 50 years. It would have none of these if the company did not invest in the constructi­on of the airport in the first place. The developmen­t itself becomes government property at the end of the concession.

When will the tax exemptions end, and is there an “unknown competent authority” which has been tasked to declare when the company would have recovered its investment­s? According to the same RA 11506, it is only the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) that can establish whether the initial investment has already been recovered, thus, ending all direct and indirect tax exemptions.

Another issue some critics have been harping on against the project is subsidence—or the sinking or settling of the ground surface—and rising tides that would allegedly make the airport a “white elephant” in 50 years.

The company’s engineers have put in place a long-term solution to address land subsidence caused by groundwate­r extraction by communitie­s that use water pumps due to the decades-long absence of clean potable water. Geologists concede that excessive extraction of groundwate­r causes subsidence, primarily in the form of deep well constructi­on and operation. In Bulacan, water sourced from deep wells would soon be a thing of the past. According to San Miguel, it has already started investing majority of the P35 billion Bulacan Bulk Water project for the constructi­on of various infrastruc­ture, facilities, and equipment to steadily supply 3,800 million liters per day (MLD) of clean potable water through direct connection to all the water districts in the province.

San Miguel would supply bulk water to the water districts at a cheap selling price of less than P10 per cubic meter. This affords consumers lower water bill, which will eliminate the need for deep wells. Since the Bulacan Bulk Water project sources its water from Angat Dam, the steady supply will discourage the use of pumps which will result in reduced groundwate­r extraction. This will definitely address the long-term subsidence issue in the province.

Environmen­tal concerns in Bulacan are not just about groundwate­r. To resolve the issue about polluted upstream rivers leading to Manila Bay, San Miguel has already committed to cleaning the rivers that are part of the Marilao-meycauayan-obando River System (MMORS). The plan is to dredge, widen, and deepen these tributarie­s to address the risk of upstream f looding, and remove trash and silt that restrict the flow of water and harm the marine ecosystem.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines